Ductal Lavage Versus Corticosteroids Therapy for Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis

October 27, 2024 updated by: Chen Kai, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Ductal Lavage Versus Corticosteroids Therapy for Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-labelled, Non-inferior Trial.

A single-arm, proof-of-concept trial has shown the safety and efficacy of ductal lavage as a treatment for idiopathic granulomatous mastitis patients (Manuscript accepted in Journal of Surgical Research 2018). In this multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, non-inferior trial, the investigators are going to enroll eligible granulomatous mastitis patients and randomized them into ductal lavage versus. corticosteroids therapy group. The primary endpoint of this study is the complete clinical response rate at 1 year after the enrollment. The aim of this study is to provide evidence for the management of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis patients .

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Non-lactational mastitis (NLM) consists of a broad spectrum of inflammatory breast diseases. Among them, periductal mastitis and idiopathic granulomatous mastitis(IGM) are the most commonly encountered in clinical practice. IGM can be diagnosed when all possible causes of granulomatous diseases (known mycobacterial or fungal infection, Wegener granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, etc.) are excluded. There is no consensus on the standard treatment of IGM patients. Surgery, oral corticosteroids, topical steroids, immunosuppressive therapy, and observation alone were all proposed as the treatment for IGM patients. However, all of the evidences are derived from retrospective studies. In a previous study, the investigators conducted a single-arm, proof-of-concept trial that showed the safety and efficacy of ductal lavage as a treatment for IGM patients. Ductal lavage is possible to spare the patients from corticosteroids therapy and or surgery. To further address this issue, the investigators are going to conduct this multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, non-inferior trial, to compare the efficacy and safety of ductal lavage and corticosteroids therapy. The aim of this study is to provide evidence for the management of IGM patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
140

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Jiangmen, Guangdong, China, 510000
        • Jiangmen Maternal and Child Health Care Population ＆ Family Planning Service Center
      • Lianjiang, Guangdong, China, 524400
        • Lian Jiang People'S Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female, age between 18 and 65 years old.
  • Inform consent signed.
  • Clinical diagnosis of non-lactating mastitis, defined as mastitis occurred more than 1 month after the cessation of lactation.
  • Clinical and pathological diagnosis of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis.
  • Never receive surgical treatments, or corticosteroids therapy after the cessation of lactation. Core needle biopsy is allowed.
  • Good health, judged by clinicians, to receive ductal lavage.
  • M score >=2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Grade III inverted nipple(Plastic. Reconstruction. Surgery. 104: 389, 1999.)
  • Lactational mastitis patients.
  • Bilateral IGM patients.
  • Clinically diagnosis of periductal mastitis.
  • Pathological diagnosis of breast carcinoma.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Evidences suggest possible diagnosis of SLE(systemic lupus erythematosus), rheumatic disorders or other systematic auto-immune diseases.
  • Evidences suggest possible diagnosis of tuberculosis.
  • Evidences suggest possible diagnosis of fungus infection of the breast
  • History of breast trauma.
  • History of taking oral corticosteroids or anti-tuberculosis treatment.
  • Imaging examinations indicates foreign objects retained in the breast
  • Presence of sepsis or severe inflammation caused by IGM, for which surgery is likely required.
  • Patients with inappropriate coagulation function, cardiac function, pulmonary function, liver and renal function, that clinicians judges as not suitable to participate in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Ductal lavage
Ductal lavage and breast massage for two weeks.
Procedure: Ductal lavage
The patients received ductal lavage and breast massage every other day for two weeks. We used lidocaine (1%) for local anesthesia around the nipple. We used a lacrimal probe to identify 4-5 openings in the lactiferous ducts on the nipple and inserted the infusion cannula (21-23G). A total of 25ml of irrigation solution (5 ml of 2% lidocaine, 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide, 20 ml of 0.9% saline and 1.0 g of ceftriaxone) was pumped into the ducts over 20-25 minutes. The patient returned to the clinic the next day for breast massage, and the cycle was repeated for two weeks.
Active Comparator: Corticosteroids therapy
Oral corticosteroids therapy for 6 months.
Drug: Corticosteroid therapy
Methylprednisolone(Common brand names: Medrol) or prednisone 20-40mg, qd for two weeks, then temper the dose gradually, and then 20mg qd for maintenance (The total duration of the treatment is 6 months).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete Clinical Response(cCR)
Time Frame: 1 year since randomization
The proportion of patients that achieve M-score <=1 at 1 year after the treatment.
1 year since randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to cCR
Time Frame: 1 year since randomization
The median time to cCR since the randomization.
1 year since randomization
Treatment failure (TF) rate
Time Frame: 1 year since randomization

The proportion of patients with TF at 1 year since the randomization. The TF status is defined as the following:

  1. If the patient has M-score>=6 before randomization, TF is defined as the M-score still remains >=6 at one month since the randomization.
  2. If the patient has M-score between 4 and 5 before randomization, TF is defined as the M-score still remains at >=4, and never have been lower than 4.
  3. If the patient has M-score<4 before randomization, and never reaches cCR since randomization, and during follow-up, the M-score is found to be >5 and last for one month.
1 year since randomization
Relapse rate
Time Frame: 1 year since randomization
The proportion of patients that had M-score>4 among those patients who achieved cCR.
1 year since randomization
Adverse events
Time Frame: 1 year since randomization
Pre-defined and any other unexpected adverse events would be recorded and compared between the two arms.
1 year since randomization
Protocol compliance rate
Time Frame: 1 year since randomization
The proportion of patients who received the treatment protocol.
1 year since randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Erwei Song, MD, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 21, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 27, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Ductal-2018-Jun-14

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The study protocol and the raw and clean data for analysis will be shared among the participated researchers. Non-researchers could obtain relevant informations from the researchers upon reasonable requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings