Flexible Tip Bougie Catheter Intubation
Comparison of the New Flexible Tip Bougie Catheter and Standard Bougie Stylet for Tracheal Intubation by Anesthesiologists in Different Difficult Airway Scenarios: a Randomized Crossover Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Masovia
-
Warsaw, Masovia, Poland, 02-662
- Lazarski University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- physicians
- give voluntary consent to participate in the study
- none experience in videolaryngoscopy
- less than 1 year experience in medicine
Exclusion Criteria:
- not meet the above criteria
- wrist or low back diseases
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Normal airway
intubation in normal aurway condition
|
intubation with the standard Bougie stylet for difficult intubation and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
intubation with The new Flexible Tip Bougie catheter and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Tongue edema
intubation in Tongue edema condition
|
intubation with the standard Bougie stylet for difficult intubation and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
intubation with The new Flexible Tip Bougie catheter and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Pharyngeal obstruction
intubation in Tongue edema condition
|
intubation with the standard Bougie stylet for difficult intubation and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
intubation with The new Flexible Tip Bougie catheter and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Manual cervical inline stabilization
intubation in Manual cervical inline stabilization condition
|
intubation with the standard Bougie stylet for difficult intubation and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
intubation with The new Flexible Tip Bougie catheter and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Cervical collar stabilization
intubation in Cervical collar stabilization condition
|
intubation with the standard Bougie stylet for difficult intubation and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
intubation with The new Flexible Tip Bougie catheter and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Cervical collar stabilization and pharyngeal obstruction
intubation in Cervical collar stabilization and pharyngeal obstruction condition
|
intubation with the standard Bougie stylet for difficult intubation and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
intubation with The new Flexible Tip Bougie catheter and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
time to intubation
Time Frame: 1 day
|
time from pick up device to the final placement tube in trachea
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
success of intubation
Time Frame: 1 day
|
A failed intubation attempt was defined as an attempt in which the trachea was not intubated, or which required more than 120 seconds to perform
|
1 day
|
|
Number of optimalization maneuvers
Time Frame: 1 day
|
the number of optimization maneuvers required (re-adjustment of head position, second assistant) to aid endotracheal intubation.
|
1 day
|
|
Ease of use
Time Frame: 1 day
|
self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization.
A 100% score is a extremely difficult procedure.
A Ease of use score of 1% means that procedure is extremely easy
|
1 day
|
|
Dental compression
Time Frame: 1 day
|
An independent observer scored the severity of dental compressions, which was calculated based on the number of audible teeth clicks (0; 1; ≥2) with the Laerdal airway trainer, and based on a grading of pressure of the teeth (none = 0; mild = 1; moderate/serve ≥2) on the Simman®3G simulator.
At the end of each scenario, each participant scored the ease of use of each intubation method on a visual analogue scale (VAS; from 0=Extremely Easy to 100=Extremely Difficult).
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- INT_2018_UL
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.