Washed Microbiota Transplantation for Tourette's Syndrome (WMT)

August 15, 2024 updated by: Faming Zhang, The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Efficacy and Safety of Washed Microbiota Transplantation for Tourette's Syndrome

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of washed microbiota transplantation in the treatment of Tourette's syndrome (TS).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Emerging scientific data support the significant role of microbiota in the modulation of the central nervous system. The reconstitution of gut microbiota might be a potential option to treat Tourette's syndrome (TS). FMT has been reported to be a highly effective therapy to restore the gut microbiota dysbiosis by transferring gut microbiota from healthy donors to patients. The newly improved methodology of FMT based on the automatic washing process and the related delivering consideration was named as washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) by the FMT-standardization study group. FMT has shown treatment potential in several gut-brain axis-related disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinson's disease, promoting us to investigate its treatment potential for Tourette's syndrome. In this study, investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy of WMT for Tourette's syndrome and its comorbidities using specialized questionnaires for Tourette's syndrome and investigate the underlying mechanism.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210011
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Microbiota Medicine & Medical Centre for Digestive Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Faming Zhang, MD,PhD
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210011
        • Recruiting
        • SIR RUN RUN hospital of Nanjing Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 56 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients were aged 6 to 17 years (inclusive);
  2. Met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria for TS;
  3. Had a Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Score (YGTSS-TTS) of at least 20 at screening and baseline.
  4. Underwent WMT.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Complicated with certain brain disease, including tumor,injury,cerebrovascular disease;
  2. Complicated with other severe disease, including cancers, organ failure, heart diseases;
  3. Stereotypy associated with autism spectrum disorder;
  4. With a confirmed diagnosis of psychiatric diseases, such as bipolar disorders; schizophrenia and major depressive disorders;
  5. Clinically significant obsessive-compulsive disorder at baseline considered to be the primary cause of impairment at baseline;
  6. Medications use affecting gut microbiota such as antibiotics and probiotics three months before WMT.
  7. Other neurologic disorders other than TS that could influence the evaluation of tics.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Washed microbiota transplantation
WMT
Drug: Washed Microbiota Transplantation
The prepared microbiota suspension was infused into the participates' lower gut.
Other Names:
  • Fecal microbiota transplantation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change of Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Score (YGTSS-TTS)
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation
The YGTSS rating scale is a semistructured clinician- or investigator-administered rating instrument in which participants or caregivers evaluate the number, frequency, intensity, complexity, and interference of motor and phonic tics in the prior week on a 6-point scale from 0 (none) to 5 (severe) [1]. The total Motor Tic Severity Score (MTSS; 0-25 points) is added to the total Vocal Tic Severity Score (VTSS; 0-25 points) to determine the TTS (0-50 points).
baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) .
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation
It is based on 15 questions which are scored into 5 domains: abdominal pain, reflux, indigestion, diarrhea, and constipation. Each item weights from 1 to 7, with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms.
baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation
the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation
Positive treatment response was defined by a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale. The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale is a 7 point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. and rated as:1.Very much improved; 2.Much improved; 3. Minimally improved; 4. No change; 5. Minimally worse; 6. Much worse; 7.Very much worse.
4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation
the change of Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome Quality-of-Life Scale score
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation
The Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome Quality-of-Life Scale with 27 items addresses the issue of how the illness affects patients' well-being. It ranges from 0 to108, and higher values represent a worse outcome.
baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation
the change of The Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham IV Scale (SNAP-IV)
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation
It is an 26-item questionnaire that measured three of the ADHD symptoms, inattention, hyperactivity and oppositional defiant disorder. The 26-item checklist is scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging between Not At All (0) and Very Much (3).
baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation
change of the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC)
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation
The SDSC was 26-item test measuring sleep problems and each item received a value from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe sleep disorders.
baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation
the difference of the gut microbe composition between individuals with TS and healthy children by sequencing faecal metagenome.
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation
The composition of the gut microbiota is evaluated by sequencing faecal metagenome. We evaluate the differences in the structure of the flora and its metabolism between individuals with TS and control children at the phylum, genus and species levels of the intestinal flora, and to develop a model for predicting the structure of the flora.
baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months post transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
SIR RUN RUN hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Faming Zhang, MD; PHD, The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 17, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 3, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 15, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WMT-TS

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings