Microbial Dysbiosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis (MyRA)

June 17, 2020 updated by: Quadram Institute Bioscience

Microbial Dysbiosis in the Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Using Metagenomics to Predict Methotrexate Efficacy

The MyRA study will primarily investigate whether there are associations between the structure and function of the gut microbiome and response to methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis patients. The microbiome will be characterised via shotgun metagenomic sequencing of microbial DNA present in stool samples taken during the participant's first 6 months of taking methotrexate.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Methotrexate is often the first drug of choice for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but its efficacy is highly variable and it can lead to severe side effects. There are currently no reliable predictors of methotrexate efficacy for people with early RA.

Microbial dysbiosis (an imbalanced microbiome) has recently been implicated in RA, with associations between specific microbes and RA biomarkers or disease activity. Gut microbes have extensive capabilities in terms of xenobiotic (e.g. drug) metabolism. Several gut microbes are able to alter the drug methotrexate in vitro, and it is possible this could effect drug efficacy in vivo. Alternatively methotrexate efficacy could be affected by baseline microbial composition or alterations to microbial composition over the course of treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Norfolk
      • Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom, NR4 7UY
        • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Early rheumatoid arthritis commencing methotrexate monotherapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-65 years of age
  • RA diagnosis based on ACR 2010 classification criteria with symptoms starting within the last 2 years
  • Referred by GP to the Early Arthritis Clinic at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS trust
  • Commencing methotrexate monotherapy for the first time

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Initially commencing combination therapy (prior to first stool sample) rather than methotrexate monotherapy i.e. MTX combined with another DMARD or prednisolone
  • Commencement of MTX therapy prior to first stool sample or cessation of MTX therapy at any point during the study
  • History of psoriasis
  • Those currently suffering from, or have ever suffered from, any diagnosed gastrointestinal disease, gastrointestinal disorders including regular diarrhoea and constipation (excluding hiatus hernia unless symptomatic) and/or have undergone gastrointestinal surgery.
  • Those regularly (3+ times/week) taking self-prescribed over the counter medications for digestive/gastrointestinal conditions
  • Use of laxatives within 7 days prior to sampling unless these have been used on a regular basis (3+ times/week) for more than one month prior to the study and will continue to be used throughout the study period
  • The use of over-the-counter medications or food/drinks containing pre and/or probiotics within 7 days prior to sampling, unless these have been used on a regular basis (3+ times/week) for more than one month prior to the study and will continue to be used throughout the study period
  • Significant alteration of the participant's normal diet at any point during the study (e.g. adoption of the 5:2 fasting diet)
  • Regular (3+ times/week) or recent (within 3 months) use of colonic irrigation or other bowel cleansing techniques
  • Recently returned to the UK following a period abroad, and who have suffered gastric symptoms during the period abroad or on return to the UK. These will be assessed on an individual basis
  • Currently taking or finished a course of antibiotics within the last 3 months
  • Currently pregnant or lactating
  • Living with or related to any member of the Study Team
  • Those who have limited or no understanding of spoken and written English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in DAS28-CRP score
Time Frame: 0-6 months
Disease Activity Score using 28 joints and C-reactive Protein
0-6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in SDAI score
Time Frame: 0-6 months
Simplified Disease Activity Index
0-6 months
Concentration of CRP in blood
Time Frame: 0-6 months
C-reactive Protein (an inflammatory biomarker)
0-6 months
ESR value (blood)
Time Frame: 0-6 months
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (an inflammatory biomarker)
0-6 months
Concentration of anti-CCP in blood
Time Frame: 0-6 months
Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated peptide (disease-specific antibody)
0-6 months
Concentration of RF in blood
Time Frame: 0-6 months
Rheumatoid Factor (disease-specific antibody)
0-6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Quadram Institute Bioscience

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
University of East Anglia
Action Arthritis

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Simon Carding, Prof, Quadram Institute Bioscience

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 10, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • QIB01/2018

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings