Cognitive Adaption Training-Effectiveness in Real-world Settings and Mechanism of Action (CAT-EM) (CAT-EM)

August 7, 2024 updated by: Dawn Velligan, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
The investigators propose a cluster randomized effectiveness trial comparing Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT; a psychosocial treatment using environmental supports such as signs, alarms, pill containers, checklists, technology and the organization of belongings established in a person's home or work environment to bypass the cognitive and motivational difficulties associated with schizophrenia ) to existing community treatment (CT) for individuals with schizophrenia in 8 community mental health centers across multiple states including 400 participants. Mechanisms of action will be examined. Participants will be assessed at baseline and 6 and 12 months on measures of functional and community outcome, medication adherence, symptoms, habit formation and automaticity, cognition and motivation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Schizophrenia remains one of the most disabling conditions world-wide with an economic burden that exceeded $155 billion dollars in fiscal year 2013 alone. Despite existing medication and community treatment, many individuals with this diagnosis continue to have poor outcomes and struggle toward recovery. CAT is a psychosocial treatment using environmental supports such as signs, alarms, pill containers, checklists, technology and the organization of belongings established in a person's home or work environment to bypass the cognitive and motivational difficulties associated with schizophrenia, and support habits for functional behavior to promote recovery. In a series of efficacy studies, CAT improved social and occupational functioning, symptoms, and adherence to medication, and reduced rates of readmission. The investigators propose a cluster randomized effectiveness trial comparing Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) to existing community treatment (CT) for individuals with schizophrenia in 8 community mental health centers across multiple states including 400 participants. This would be the first large-scale effectiveness study of CAT for improving functional outcomes for those with schizophrenia seen in community mental health centers (CMHCs) where the majority of those with schizophrenia are followed for outpatient care and to study the purported mechanisms of action based on an integrated theoretical model. Participants will be assessed at baseline and 6 and 12 months on measures of functional and community outcome, medication adherence, symptoms, habit formation and automaticity, cognition and motivation. CAT treatment will be weekly for 6 months, biweekly for 3 months and monthly for the remainder of the trial. Purported mechanisms of action for CAT including bypassing impairments in cognitive function to improve functional outcome and bypassing motivational impairments to create automatic habits to improve functional outcome will be examined.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
205

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • Dayville, Connecticut, United States, 06241
        • United Services Inc.
    • Florida
      • Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States, 33319
        • Henderson Behavioral Health
    • Illinois
      • Granite City, Illinois, United States, 62040
        • Chestnut Health Systems
    • Indiana
      • Lawrenceburg, Indiana, United States, 47025
        • Community Mental Health Center Inc.
    • New Hampshire
      • Manchester, New Hampshire, United States, 03101
        • Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Peace Health
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02904
        • Providence Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77074
        • The Harris Center for Mental Health & IDD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males and females who have given informed consent.
  2. Between the ages of 18 and 65.
  3. Clinical Diagnosis of Schizophrenia, or Schizoaffective Disorder
  4. Able to provide evidence of a stable living environment (individual apartment, family home, board and care facility) within the last three months and no plans to move in the next year.
  5. Able to understand and complete rating scales and assessments.
  6. Agree to home visits
  7. Be able to have reimbursed home visits as part of treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Alcohol or drug or dependence within the past 2 months.
  2. Currently being treated by an Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) team.
  3. History of assault within the past year or other conditions that in the judgement of the treatment team make home visits unsafe.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cognitive Adaptation Training
Psychosocial treatment using environmental supports such as signs, alarms, pill containers, checklists, technology and the organization of belongings established in a person's home or work environment to bypass the cognitive and motivational difficulties associated with schizophrenia, and support habits for functional behavior to promote recovery.
Behavioral: Cognitive Adaptation Training
Psychosocial treatment using environmental supports to bypass cognitive and motivational problems and improve adaptive behavior
Other Names:
  • CAT
Active Comparator: Community Treatment
Medication follow-up and case management as provided by the community mental health center according to usual care.
Behavioral: Community Treatment
Medication follow-up and case management as provided in usual community care in the setting
Other Names:
  • CT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Social and Occupational Functioning Scale Scores
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
A rating from 0-100 reflecting global level of Social and Occupational functioning; Higher scores indicate better functioning.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Daily activity
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Negative Symptom Assessment item 14 assessing typical daily behavior using a structured interview with behavioral anchor points. Scale is rated 1 to 6 with higher scores indicating lower levels of engagement in daily activity (i.e. more severe apathy)
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Multnomah Community Ability Scale mean score
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Assessment of community functioning on a 17 -item scale with domains assessing interference with functioning, adjustment to living, social competence and behavioral problems. Items are averaged to produce a mean score. Items are each rated on a scale from 1-5 with higher scores reflecting better community functioning.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Adherence Estimate Score
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
A 3 item scale assessing variables associated with adherence. Items are rated based upon self report about the importance of taking medication, worry about medication and financial burden of medication on a scale from agree completely to disagree completely. Each answer is assigned points based on an algorithm and added producing a total score. Higher scores indicate a higher risk for adherence and a lower probability of adherence. Scores range for 0 to 100.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Negative Symptom Assessment-16 Mean Score
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Assesses 16 negative symptoms in the domains of communication, emotion/affect, social activity, motivation and psychomotor activity on a scale from 1-6. Items are added and divided by 16 to produce a mean score. A global score is also produced based upon clinical judgement following the interview Higher scores reflect higher levels of negative symptoms.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in the Expanded Version Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)-total score
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
24 item scale assessing multiple dimensions of psychopathology including positive symptoms; negative symptoms, anxiety/depression, and activation on a series of 7 point scales. Higher scores reflect higher levels of symptoms.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Probability Difference score
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
computerized task of effort put forth to win various amounts of money under various levels of probability. The probability difference score equals the percent of hard choices in the high probability condition minus the percent of hard choices in the low probability condition. Higher scores indicate more frequent choices of hard tasks at the high versus low probability level. individuals who answer the same way on all tasks are eliminated (estimate 1%)
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in global score of Brief Assessment of Cognition (BACS) App
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Ipad delivered version of BACS assessing memory, attention, executive function and psychomotor speed. Standard scores are generated and summed to create a global cognition score with higher scores indicating better levels of cognitive function.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Vanguard Research Group

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dawn Velligan, PhD, University of Texas

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 31, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 7, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HSC20180237H
  • 1R01MH117101-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The investigators will be fully compliant with the NIMH Data Archive Data Sharing Terms and Conditions, including submitting and harmonizing all descriptive/raw data and analyzed data generated by the grant at the item and subject-level to the National Database for Clinical Trials (NDCT). All submitted data will include a Global Unique Identifier (GUID) and will not include personally identifiable information (PII).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 mos following publication of the primary outcomes of the study and extending for a period of 2 years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

deidentified data only upon email request to PI with specific research questions and analysis plan.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings