Spanish Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Memory Support System

October 28, 2021 updated by: Octavio A. Santos, Mayo Clinic
This study seeks to translate a proven cognitive treatment for Spanish-speaking Hispanics with subjective memory/cognitive complaints or a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and their care partners. MCI causes cognitive changes that are noticed by the individual or others. These changes do not significantly interfere with independence. MCI also increases the risk of developing Alzheimer's or another dementia, particularly in Hispanics/Latinos. There is no medication that improves cognition or delays MCI. However, providing cognitive treatment can alleviate the effects of MCI. Only a few cognitive interventions have been proven effective in the U.S., but none has been adapted to the Spanish-speaking Hispanic community. Our proposed cognitive treatment uses effective strategies (e.g., calendar and notetaking) to compensate for memory loss. The investigators will first follow international guidelines to ensure proper translation of our treatment into Spanish. Then, the investigators will pilot test our translated intervention in 20 Spanish-speaking Hispanic participants with subjective memory/cognitive complaints or a diagnosis of MCI and their care partners (40 participants total). The investigators will also assess the degree to which participants follow medical advice; their beliefs in their ability to succeed in and do daily activities, including managing medications; their feelings and potential burden associated with caregiving before and after the treatment as well as 8 weeks later. Results will allow the investigators to determine whether our treatment was effective and to calculate the number of participants required for larger studies. Overall, the study represents an important step to respond to the needs of the Hispanic community.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) constitutes a high-risk state for conversion to dementia, making the search for interventions an urgent priority. In the absence of medications or dietary agents that improve cognition or delay MCI progression, offering nonpharmacological care approaches is currently considered good practice. Despite that, there are only a few evidence-based cognitive interventions for individuals with MCI available in the U.S. and, to the best of our knowledge, none is culturally sensitive to Hispanics; a group more prone to Alzheimer's disease or other dementias compared to non-Hispanic Whites. The overall goal and primary aim of this pilot project is to translate and begin to culturally adapt an evidence-based compensatory cognitive rehabilitation intervention, the Memory Support System (MSS), for Spanish-speaking Hispanics with subjective memory/cognitive complaints or a diagnosis of MCI and their care partners residing in the U.S. The MSS is a calendar/notetaking intervention proven effective in helping those with MCI compensate for memory loss in day-to-day function. Translation of the MSS and other materials will follow international guidelines. The Spanish MSS will be piloted in a sample of 20 participants in a within-subject, pre- and post-intervention assessment design. Outcome measures of program adherence, functional memory/general ability, self-efficacy, mood, anxiety, medication management skills, quality of life, and caregiver burden will be administered before and after the intervention, as well as at 8-week post-intervention to estimate effect size for power analyses for use in a future between-subject random assignment multicenter clinical trial. Overall, this pilot project represents an important step to significantly contribute to the development and promotion of clinical neuropsychological interventions responsive to the needs of the Hispanic community.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjective memory/cognitive complaints or a diagnosis of single or multi-domain MCI
  • Global score of ≤0.5 on the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)
  • Scores of ≥4 on items six to nine on the Linguistic History Form (CLS) and scores of ≤6 on items on the Functional Assessment Scale (FAS), when applicable, from the Spanish language Uniformed Data Set (UDS) from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's (NACC);
  • A score of ≥115 on the Spanish Translation of the Dementia Rating Scale-Second edition (ST-DRS-2);
  • Having contact with a cognitively normal care partner screened with the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE ≥24) at least twice a week; and
  • Either not taking or stable on nootropic(s) for at least 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Visual/hearing impairment and/or history of reading or written inability/disability sufficient to interfere with MSS training; and/or
  • Inclusion in another clinical trial that would exclude participation; subject will be considered for participation at the end of such a trial or as appropriate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: MCI Group
A within-subject, multiple baseline design, with each subject serving as their own control,4 will be implemented to get the maximum number of participants trained in the use of the MSS during the proposed funding period. This 2-year study will involve four phases: a 4-month translation and cultural adaptation development phase, a 12-month recruitment and treatment implementation phase, a 6-month post data collection only phase, and a 2-month data analysis and result writing phase. Data analyses will be conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) program.
Behavioral: Memory Support System (MSS)
A calendar/notetaking system focused on training a person with MCI to use a specific external memory compensatory strategy to complete relevant IADLs independently.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Memory Support System (MSS) adherence at 2 weeks after intervention start and at 2-month follow-up
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
To assess MSS adherence (i.e., how well a participant with subjective memory/cognitive complaints or a diagnosis of MCI utilizes all the MSS sections), the therapist will rate each participant based upon four criteria (≥7/10 scores considered compliant) for 2 days randomly selected.
2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Memory functional ability at 2 weeks after intervention start and at 2-month follow-up
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
To assess memory functional ability, care partners will complete a modified version of the Memory Subscale of the Everyday Cognition (E-Cog) at all assessment points. The E-Cog scores range from 8 to 32, where lower scores represent better memory functional ability.
2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Self-efficacy at 2 weeks after intervention start and at 2-month follow-up
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
To assess self-efficacy, participants with subjective memory/cognitive complaints or a diagnosis of MCI will complete a modified version of specific subscales the Self-Efficacy in Memory scale (SEM) (Do Chores, Social/Recreational Activities, and Manage Disease in General) of the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales at all assessment points. The SEM scores range from 9 to 90, where higher scores represent better self-efficacy.
2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Mood at 2 weeks after intervention start and at 2-month follow-up
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
To assess mood, participants with subjective memory/cognitive complaints or a diagnosis of MCI and care partners will complete the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) at all assessment points. The CES-D scores range from 0-60, where higher scores represent more symptoms of depression.
2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Anxiety at 2 weeks after intervention start and at 2-month follow-up
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
To assess anxiety, participants with subjective memory/cognitive complaints or a diagnosis of MCI and care partners will complete the Anxiety Inventory Form from the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory by the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health project (REACH) at all assessment points. The REACH scores range from 10-40, where higher scores represent more symptoms of anxiety.
2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Quality of Life at 2 weeks after intervention start and at 2-month follow-up
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
To assess quality of life, participants with subjective memory/cognitive complaints or a diagnosis of MCI and care partners will complete the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease measure (QoL-AD) at all assessment points. The QoL-AD scores range from 13-52, where higher scores represent better quality of life.
2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
Change from Baseline General Functional Ability at 2 weeks after intervention start and at 2-month follow-up
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
To assess general functional ability, care partners will complete the Functional Assessment Scale (FAS)
2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Caregiver Burden at 2 weeks after intervention start and at 2-month follow-up
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
To assess caregiver burden, care partners will complete the Caregiver Burden Interview-Short Form (CBI-SF) at all assessment points. The CBI-SF scores range from 0-48, where higher scores represent more care giver burden.
2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Medication Management Skills at 2 weeks after intervention start and at 2-month follow-up
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up
To assess medication management skills, participants with subjective memory/cognitive complaints or a diagnosis of MCI will complete the Pillbox Test (PT) at all assessment points (≥5 errors considered failure).
2 weeks after intervention start and 2-month follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention evaluation by participants and support partners
Time Frame: 2-month follow-up
To evaluate intervention at the end of MSS training, each dyad will undergo a qualitative semi-structured interview by the therapist about the training process itself, seeking suggestions for improving the MSS, teaching curriculum, and intervention logistics.
2-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Octavio A Santos, PhD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 6, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18-008125

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

All published reports will be of a summary nature, and no individual research subjects will be identified except to the investigative staff involved and only for research purposes. No personal identifying data will be released on subjects without prior consent from the subject. Data will be obtained from study participants via clinical records and interaction with the principal investigator (PI) (Dr. Santos) and/or PI's supervisors (Drs. Chandler and Pedraza). The proposed study will utilize webbased electronic data capture forms using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software previously created for use in other studies and stored on a server hosted by the Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science Activities (CTSA) (Grant UL1 RR024150). REDCap is a secure Web-based application for building and managing online databases for clinical research studies. Information in REDCap will be scrubbed of Protected Health Information and utilize research IDs.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings