Clinical Evaluation of an Investigational Lipid Drop in Non-contact Lens Wearing Patients

June 28, 2023 updated by: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
This is a double-masked, randomized, bilateral, 2-Arm parallel group study. Subjects are scheduled for 3 study visits (screening/baseline, 7-Day and 30-Day follow-up visits) over a period of one month.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
161

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Amarillo, Texas, United States, 79119
        • Premier Vision

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 69 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Potential subjects must satisfy all the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

    1. Subjects must be at least 18 years of age and no more than 69 years of age (inclusive).
    2. Subjects must be non-contact lens wearers.
    3. Subjects must achieve visual acuity of 20/30 or better in each eye, either unaided or best corrected.
    4. Subjects must possess a functional/usable pair of spectacles and bring them to every visit (only if applicable - to the investigators discretion).
    5. Self-reported symptoms of ocular dryness or irritation and/or the use of artificial tears in the last 3 months.
    6. Subjects must read, understand, and sign the Statement of Informed Consent.

    7. Subjects must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.

      Exclusion Criteria:

  • Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:

    1. Currently pregnant or breast-feeding.
    2. Diabetes.
    3. Any ocular or systemic allergies or disease which may interfere with the clinical trial (at the investigator's discretion).
    4. Any systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication which may interfere with the clinical trial (at the investigator's discretion).
    5. Any infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or a contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), by self-report.
    6. Any Grade 3 or greater biomicroscopy findings (this includes, corneal edema, corneal staining, corneal vascularization, conjunctival injection, tarsal abnormalities, bulbar injection) on the FDA scale.
    7. Any active ocular abnormalities/conditions that may interfere with the clinical trial (this includes, but not limited to, chalazia, recurrent styles, pterygium, infection, etc.).
    8. Any corneal distortion due to previous rigid gas permeable lens wear, surgery or pathology.
    9. History of any ocular or corneal surgery (e.g. RK, PRK, LASIK).
    10. Participation in any pharmaceutical or medical device related clinical trial within 30 days prior to study enrollment.
    11. History of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus.
    12. Habitual wearers of soft contact lenses in the past 1 month or rigid gas permeable lens within the past 3 months.
    13. Current habitual use of Prescription Medicines to treat dry eye or ocular discomfort, ocular steroids, or any medication (RX or OTC) that would interfere with the clinical study (at the discretion of the investigator).
    14. Employees of investigational clinic (investigator, coordinator, and technician, etc.) or family member of an employee of the clinical site by self-report.

In addition to the above criteria, patients with any allergy or sensitivity to ingredients that this product may contain (Castor Oil, Polyoxyl 40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil, Sodium Chlorite, Boric Acid, Sodium Borate Decahydrate, Sodium Chloride, Potassium Chloride, Calcium Chloride Dihydrate, Magnesium Chloride Hexahydrate, Polyethylene Glycol 400, Sodium Hyaluronate, Purified Water) should not participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Test Eye Drops
Eligible subjects that are non-contact lens wearers will be randomized to the Test group throughout the duration of the study.
Device: 9618X investigational lipid eye drops
Test Eye Drops
Active Comparator: Control Eye Drops
Eligible subjects that are non-contact lens wearers will be randomized to the Control group throughout the duration of the study.
Device: Blink® Tears
Control Eye Drops

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Ocular Comfort (30-Day)
Time Frame: Baseline and 30-Day Follow-up
Subjective overall ocular comfort was assessed at baseline, and at the 30-Day follow-up using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (extremely uncomfortable) to 100 (extremely comfortable). The change from baseline ocular comfort score was calculated as 30-Day follow-up score minus Baseline score. Change from Baseline VAS Scores range from -100 to 100, where higher change from baseline comfort scores indicates better performance. The average change from baseline comfort score for each Arm was report.
Baseline and 30-Day Follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Ocular Comfort (7-Day)
Time Frame: Baseline and 7-Day Follow-up
Subjective overall ocular comfort was assessed at baseline, and at the 7-Day follow-up using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (extremely uncomfortable) to 100 (extremely comfortable). The change from baseline ocular comfort score was calculated as 7-Day follow-up score minus Baseline score. Change from Baseline VAS Scores range from -100 to 100, where higher change from baseline comfort scores indicates better performance. The average change from baseline comfort score for each Arm was report.
Baseline and 7-Day Follow-up
Number of Subject Eyes That Reported Ocular Symptoms
Time Frame: 7-Day Follow-up and 30-Day Follow-up
Subjects were reported whether they experienced any ocular symptoms, problems or complaints (yes/no) by eye. Ocular symptoms were assessed for each subject eye at all study visits (scheduled and unscheduled). The number of eyes that experience ocular symptoms or complaints was reported for the 7- and 30-Day follow-up.
7-Day Follow-up and 30-Day Follow-up
Number of Subject Eyes That Experience Grade 2 or Higher Corneal Staining
Time Frame: 7-Day Follow-up and 30-Day Follow-up
Corneal staining was analyzed using the FDA grading scale (ie, Grade 0 = None, Grade 1 = Trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = Moderate and Grade 4 = Severe). These responses were categorized into a binary outcome as 1 if any Grade 2 or higher corneal staining was observed or otherwise 0 is recorded. Subjects with multiple events were counted only once for the analysis purpose.
7-Day Follow-up and 30-Day Follow-up
Change From Baseline Ocular Vision (7-Day)
Time Frame: Baseline and 7 Day-Day Follow-up
Subjective overall ocular vision was assessed at baseline, dispensing and 7-Day follow-up using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (extremely uncomfortable) to 100 (extremely comfortable). The change from baseline ocular vision score was calculated as 7-Day follow-up score minus Baseline score. Change from Baseline VAS Scores range from -100 to 100, where higher change from baseline vision scores indicates better performance. The average change from baseline vision score for each Arm was report.
Baseline and 7 Day-Day Follow-up
Change From Baseline Ocular Vision (30-Day)
Time Frame: Baseline and 30 Day Follow-up
Subjective overall ocular vision was assessed at baseline, dispensing and 30 Day follow-up using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (extremely uncomfortable) to 100 (extremely comfortable). The change from baseline ocular vision score was calculated as 30-Day follow-up score minus Baseline score. Change from Baseline VAS Scores range from -100 to 100, where higher change from baseline vision scores indicates better performance. The average change from baseline vision score for each Arm was report.
Baseline and 30 Day Follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR-6328

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Johnson & Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Visual Acuity

Clinical Trials on 9618X investigational lipid eye drops

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings