Preventing Premature Death in Patients With Serious Opioid-related Infection

July 26, 2020 updated by: Marc Swogger, University of Rochester

Preventing Premature Death Among Hospital Patients With Serious Opioid-Related Infection (SORI): A Phase 1 Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of a combination of motivational interventions and a brief therapy session to increase the adherence to medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioids.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

We will recruit 30 SORI inpatients ages 18-plus admitted to the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC). We will administer a battery of validated assessments of substance use, overdose history and risk, opioid-related infection, and suicidal behavior at baseline and approximately 2- and 4-week follow-ups. We will assess both forms of overdose (unintentional, intentional - i.e., suicidal behavior) because each is common in intravenous drug users and they require systematic assessment to disentangle. All recruited individuals will receive one-to-three MI sessions as they begin the MAT that is part of standard hospital care. Patients will be offered computer-based CBT, which they will complete on the unit at their convenience. The CBT program records duration of use of the treatment modules, enabling us to track patients' level of CBT treatment participation. Patient-completed intervention feedback forms and treatment completion will be examined after 15 subjects have participated. Based on this feedback, we will pilot an adapted (MI plus CBT) treatment manual, obtaining additional feedback on acceptability. We will assess psychopathy, a constellation of stable traits and potentially important moderator of treatment effects, at baseline. We will assess potential mediators (i.e., motivation to change, self-regulation) using validated measures at baseline and at approximately 2- and 4-weeks post-discharge.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
11

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Willing to provide contact information (e.g., email, phone, address)
  • Presence of SORI, including endocarditis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, epidural abscess, or serious bacteremia
  • Hospital length of stay estimated at > 3 weeks
  • Admitted to URMC and seen by the Toxicology Consult Team. Providers will be informed of inclusion/exclusion requirements so that they can make an informed decision about whether a patient may be approached.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speaking
  • Unwilling to provide informed consent; unable to provide informed consent or participate in study procedures due to lack of comprehension, medical barriers (e.g., intubated), or behavioral (e.g., violence) or severe psychiatric problems (e.g., florid psychosis). Capacity to provide informed consent will be determined by their treatment team or other provider consult team as appropriate. This serves a dual function of both basing consent capacity on the most accurate and current medical information, as well as keeping their treatment team informed of any research involvement of their patient.
  • Note that patients may be ineligible initially but become eligible due to stabilization during hospitalization, at which point we would then proceed as usual with the identification and recruitment process. We will seek to recruit every SORI admission who meets eligibility criteria within the recruitment timeframe.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Behavioral intervention
Patients admitted to Strong Hospital with opioid use will be given 1 to 3 brief motivational interventions and computer based cognitive behavioral therapy
Behavioral: brief motivational intervention (BMI)
The intervention typically takes 45 minutes to administer and is designed to enhance motivation to change and includes the following components: establishing rapport, asking permission to discuss substance use and providing feedback regarding the substance use assessment, exploring personal consequences of drug use, eliciting the gap between real and desired quality of life, and discussing readiness to change. The therapist then negotiates a written action plan, during which the subject is supported with empathy and verbal reinforcement.
Behavioral: cognitive behavioral therapy
This evidence-based, online, Computer Based Training for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT4CBT) program covers six lessons: 1) changing patterns of use, 2) coping with craving, 3) refusing drugs, 4) problem-solving skills, 5) changing drug-related thoughts, and 6) improving decision-making. The program is designed to be user-friendly and includes videotaped instructions and examples, interactive assessments, and practice exercises.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of participants who completed the week 4 follow up assessments
Time Frame: week 4
The percentage of participants who completed the week 4 follow up assessments.
week 4
Percentage of participants who report intervention acceptability
Time Frame: week 4
Written and verbal feedback will be collected from participants.
week 4
Change in mean readiness
Time Frame: baseline to 2 weeks
A readiness ruler with a scale of 1- 10 where higher numbers indicate better health outcomes will be used to to assess motivation to change illicit substance use.
baseline to 2 weeks
Change in mean self-regulation
Time Frame: baseline to 2 weeks

The Self-Regulation Questionnaire is a 63 item questionnaire with each question rated at a 5-point likert scale.

> 239 High (intact) self-regulation capacity (top quartile) 214-238 Intermediate (moderate) self-regulation capacity (middle quartiles) < 213 Low (impaired) self-regulation capacity (bottom quartile)
baseline to 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Rochester

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RSRB00003696

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid Use

Clinical Trials on brief motivational intervention (BMI)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings