VALES+Tú: Targeting Psychosocial Stressors to Reduce Latino Day Laborers (LDL) Injury Disparities

December 3, 2022 updated by: Maria Eugenia Fernandez-Esquer, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

VALES+Tú: Targeting Psychosocial Stressors to Reduce Latino Day Laborers Injury Disparities

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of VALES+Tú in reducing hazardous exposures at work and to determine the mediating effect of psychosocial stressors on VALES+Tú primary outcomes

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

325

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • self-identify as Hispanic or Latino
  • be present at the corner for the purpose of looking for work

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have not been previously hired to work at a corner
  • symptoms of COVID-19 in the previous 48 hours

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: individual (Brief Motivational Intervention)
A baseline survey will be administered prior to the session.Sessions will be initiated by exploring working conditions and psychosocial factors that may influence risk for work related injuries. If the LDL is motivated to change the target behavior, a 'change plan' will be developed which involves identifying reasons for change, goals in making change, specific actions and timelines, and others who may help the person change. The final step will be the development of a personal safety plan to reduce work place risks and a discussion of the following topics: (a) how they will know if their plan is successful, (b) potential obstacles, and (c) what the worker can do if the plan does not work. Finally,each worker will be asked to write and sign a personal pledge ("Mi Promesa") to implement his own safety plan.Follow-up surveys will be conducted 4 weeks after the baseline survey.
Experimental: Group (Group Problem Solving)
Participants will be administered a baseline survey prior to session. The GPS intervention consists of a discussion between 2-5 LDLs and a trained group facilitator. The sessions will last 30-45 minutes and are intended to encourage and support Latino day laborers (LDL) to act to reduce work-related hazards and promote worksite safety. The intervention combines four participatory and group problem solving activities to engage in collaborative learning: an icebreaker, the risk identification, action planning, and Nuestra Promesa (Our Pledge). The last activity requires LDL to select a risk reduction behavior and then to fill out and sign a card detailing a pledge to implement a safety plan. Follow up surveys will be conducted four weeks post intervention, to assess participants' change in attitudes, beliefs, and risk reducing behavior and their implementation or their safety plan.
Placebo Comparator: Standard of Care
Participant will be administered a baseline survey prior to the session.Participants in this standard of care control group will receive four wallet size cards with information about risk reduction strategies to deal with the four hazards responsible for most workplace fatalities in Texas: falls, struck by, heat exposure and cuts. The laminated cards are adapted from OSHA's website publicly available materials in Spanish for workers with limited literacy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Work Hazard Exposure as Assessed by a Survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks post intervention
Total score on the work hazard exposure survey ranges from 1 - 4, with a higher score indicating greater work hazard exposures. The data are reported as score at post-intervention minus score at baseline.
Baseline, 4 weeks post intervention
Change in Work Conditions as Assessed by a Survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks post intervention
Total score on the work conditions survey ranges from 1 - 4, with a higher score indicating greater adverse work conditions. The data are reported as score at post-intervention minus score at baseline.
Baseline, 4 weeks post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Safety Practices as Assessed by a Survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks post intervention
The score for each of the 22 safety practices items ranged from 1-4, with a higher score indicating greater safety practice. The total score for the complete scale consisting of all 22 items is the average of items responded to and also ranged from 1-4. Separate scores for each subscale were computed similarly. The first subscale consisted of eight items; the second consisted of four items, and the third consisted of three items--the score for each subscale ranged from 1-4, with a higher score indicating greater safety practice. There were seven original items that were not associated with the subscales derived from the factor analyses. The data are reported as scores at post-intervention minus scores at baseline.
Baseline, 4 weeks post intervention
Number of Participants That Implemented the Safety Plan as Assessed by a Survey
Time Frame: 4 weeks post intervention
Participants were asked if they implemented the safety plan and they were asked to answer as yes, no or partially
4 weeks post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Eugenia Fernandez-Esquer, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-SPH-18-0337
  • 1R01MD012928 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Work-related Injury

Clinical Trials on individual -Brief Motivational Intervention (BMI)

Subscribe