The DETECT HCV Screening Trial (DETECT HCV)

February 4, 2025 updated by: Jason Haukoos, Denver Health and Hospital Authority

The Determining Effective Testing in Emergency Departments and Care Coordination on Treatment Outcomes (DETECT) for HCV Trial

The investigators propose to compare the effectiveness of nontargeted rapid opt-out hepatitis C (HCV) screening versus targeted rapid opt-out HCV screening using recommended risk characteristics in multiple urban emergency departments (EDs) across the United States (Aim 1 - "Screening Trial").

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators will perform a prospective pragmatic randomized effectiveness trial that will allow the investigators to directly compare 2 HCV screening methods while minimizing threats to internal validity. Patients will be screened for HCV infection using 1 of 2 interventions using a balanced patient-level random allocation scheme built into existing electronic health records (EHRs) for each ED. Patients will therefore be offered HCV testing based on the result of the screening arm to which they are assigned, and in the case of the targeted arm, the results of the risk assessment evaluation performed by the intake nurse. All randomization will be completely integrated into electronic medical screening systems and workflow at each site. Integration of randomization into the electronic systems will allow for real-time concealed random allocation. Nurses who perform screening and all other ED staff (e.g. physicians, technicians) will understand the conceptual goals of the project but will be blinded to study hypotheses, and patients will be completely blinded to the purpose of the study.

This study will be performed at multiple sites, including the EDs at Denver Health Medical Center (DHMC) (Denver, Colorado), Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) (Baltimore, Maryland), and the University of Mississippi Medical Center (UMMC) (Jackson, Mississippi).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
147533

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80204
        • Denver Health Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins University
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39216
        • University of Mississippi Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Present to EDs during study enrollment period
  • Clinically stable per screening nurse or physician assessment
  • Able to provide consent for medical care

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 18 years of age
  • Are unable to consent for care (i.e., altered mentation, critical illness, or injury)
  • Have already participated in the trial
  • Self-Identify as already living with HCV

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Nontargeted Screening
The nontargeted HCV screening arm will consist of implementing non-risk-based rapid opt-out HCV screening.
Other: HCV Screening
The investigators will perform a prospective pragmatic randomized effectiveness trial that will allow the investigators to directly compare 2 HCV screening methods while minimizing threats to internal validity. Patients will be screened for HCV infection using 1 of 2 interventions using a balanced patient-level random allocation scheme built into existing EHRs for each ED.
Other: Targeted Screening
The targeted HCV screening arm will consist of implementation of risk-based rapid opt-out HCV screening using current recommendations for HCV screening by the CDC, USPSTF, and AASLD-IDSA. Targeted HCV screening will consist of offering HCV testing to those identified with the following specific risk characteristics, adapted from the above recommendations: born between 1945 - 1965 ("birth cohort"); injection drug use (IDU); intranasal drug use;tattoo or piercing in an unregulated setting; or blood transfusion or organ recipient before 1992.
Other: HCV Screening
The investigators will perform a prospective pragmatic randomized effectiveness trial that will allow the investigators to directly compare 2 HCV screening methods while minimizing threats to internal validity. Patients will be screened for HCV infection using 1 of 2 interventions using a balanced patient-level random allocation scheme built into existing EHRs for each ED.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Newly diagnosed active HCV
Time Frame: 1 day from ED visit
Confirmed cases of newly diagnosed active HCV, defined as patients who test positive for HCV antibody and measurable HCV RNA, and without a prior HCV diagnosis, stratified by study arm
1 day from ED visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HCV test acceptance
Time Frame: 1 day from ED visit
Defined by the proportion of patients who agree to HCV testing, as measured by the proportion of those who consent among patients offered HCV testing, stratified by study arm
1 day from ED visit
HCV test completion
Time Frame: 1 day from ED visit
Defined by the proportion of patients who complete HCV testing, as measured by the proportion of rapid HCV tests completed among patients who accepted testing, stratified by study arm
1 day from ED visit

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HCV genotype among those identified with active HCV
Time Frame: 12 months following HCV diagnosis
Measured by HCV genotyping among those identified with active HCV
12 months following HCV diagnosis
Fibrosis staging
Time Frame: 12 months following HCV diagnosis
Measured by standard of care fibrosis staging approaches (e.g. biopsy, ultrasound, FibroTest, etc.) among those identified with active HCV
12 months following HCV diagnosis
Completion of an evaluation by an HCV treatment expert
Time Frame: 12 months following HCV diagnosis
Measured by indication of a completed visit with an HCV treatment expert among those identified with active HCV
12 months following HCV diagnosis
Initiation of treatment with Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs)
Time Frame: 12 months following HCV diagnosis
Measured by indication of initiation of treatment with DAAs among those identified with active HCV
12 months following HCV diagnosis
Completion of treatment with Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs)
Time Frame: 12 months following HCV diagnosis
Measured by indication of completion of treatment with DAAs among those identified with active HCV
12 months following HCV diagnosis
Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12)
Time Frame: 12 months following HCV diagnosis
Measured by undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after completion of DAAs among those identified with active HCV
12 months following HCV diagnosis

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Denver Health and Hospital Authority

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Boston University
Johns Hopkins University
Boston Medical Center
University of Cincinnati
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Alameda County Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sarah Rowan, MD, Denver Health
  • Principal Investigator: Jason Haukoos, MD, MSc, Denver Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R01DA042982 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C

Clinical Trials on HCV Screening

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings