The Effect of Tart Cherry (Prunus Cerasus) Concentrate on Physiological and Cognitive Function

April 6, 2021 updated by: Northumbria University

The Effect of Tart Cherry (Prunus Cerasus) Concentrate on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Exercise Capacity and Cognitive Function

A randomized, double blind, counterbalanced, placebo controlled independent groups design to determine the effects of 3 month supplementation with tart cherry concentrate on indices of cardiometabolic health, exercise capacity and cognitive function. Following screening and recruitment, participants are familiarised with the testing equipment and procedures after which they will be randomly assigned to receive either Montmorency tart cherry concentrate (MC) or an isocaloric placebo (PLA), stratified by gender. The study is comprised of two experimental visits and outcome variables are assessed at baseline (before supplementation) and at 3 months (follow up; after supplementation).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
56

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE18ST
        • Northumbria University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy individuals between the ages of 40-60 years
  • consume on average ≤5 servings of fruits and vegetables per day
  • additionally have ≥1 risk factor for type 2 diabetes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not regularly taking medication (or stabilised ≥ 3 months, with no adverse symptoms) or antioxidant supplements
  • history of cardiometabolic, gastointestinal disease or malabsorption syndromes
  • stage 2 hypertension (SBP >159 mm Hg or DBP >99 mm Hg)
  • individuals who report changes in dietary or physical activity patterns within 3 months
  • vegetarians, vegans or known eating disorders
  • alcohol intake of more than 21 units per week
  • BMI ≥40 kg/m2
  • are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study, lactating, or initiating or changing a hormone replacement therapy regimen within 3 months of the start of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Montmorency tart cherry concentrate
Participants will consume 30 ml of Montmorency tart cherry concentrate (MC) concentrate (King Orchard farms, USA) twice daily, once in the morning and again in the evening. According to the manufacturer each 30 ml dose of MC is estimated to be equivalent to approximately 90 whole cherries (equating to ~180 cherries per day).
Dietary supplement: Montmorency tart cherry concentrate
Based on previous analysis done by our laboratory each 60 ml of Montmorency tart cherry concentrate contains approximately 73.5 mg of anthocyanins (cyanidin-3-glucoside equivalents) and 178.8 mg of total phenolics (mean gallic acid equivalents)
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Isocaloric cherry flavoured placebo
The PLA is prepared by mixing by mixing unsweetened black cherry flavoured Kool-Aid (Kraft Foods, United States), dextrose, fructose with water to best match the calorie content of the MC concentrate. Additional lemon juice, for tartness, and artificial food colouring is added so the final product had a similar visual properties to the active comparator.
Dietary supplement: Placebo
Placebo beverage matched for calorie content and visual properties of the cherry concentrate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Change from baseline at 3 months
Arterial Stiffness
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
Pulse wave velocity (m/s)
Change from baseline at 3 months
Arterial Stiffness
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
Augmentation index (%)
Change from baseline at 3 months
Endothelial function
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
Flow mediated dilation (% change)
Change from baseline at 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Indices of metabolic health
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
glucose (mmol/L) triglycerides (mmol/L) LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) HDL cholesterol (mmol/L)
Change from baseline at 3 months
Cognitive function
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
Computerized cognitive function assessment percentage accuracy (%)
Change from baseline at 3 months
Cognitive function
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
Computerized cognitive function assessment reaction time (m/s)
Change from baseline at 3 months
Cerebral Blood flow
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
Oxygenated heamoglobin (Oxyhb)
Change from baseline at 3 months
Cerebral Blood flow
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
Deoxygenated heamoglobin (deoxyhb)
Change from baseline at 3 months
Exercise Capacity
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
Estimated aerobic exercise capacity (VO2max) measured by a submaximal cycling test
Change from baseline at 3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body composition
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
Fat mass (g) Lean mass (g)
Change from baseline at 3 months
Body composition
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
Fat percentage (%)
Change from baseline at 3 months
Body composition
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months
Android/gynoid ratio
Change from baseline at 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Northumbria University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Cherry Marketing Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 12, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 29, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 15, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 6, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 4240

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings