Antireflux Ablation Therapy (ARAT) Vs Antireflux Mucosectomy (ARMS) In The Management Of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

April 22, 2025 updated by: Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico

Ablation Of The Esophagogastric Junction With Hybrid Argon Plasma Vs Mucosectomy With Band in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Without Hiatal Hernia

Gastroesophageal reflux disease has a high global prevalence, proton pump inhibitors are the cornerstone in the management but 10-20% of the patients are refractory to these, surgical treatment being an option of treatment in these patient but its associated with high morbidity, as well as a greater possibility of early therapeutic failure, for these reasons new therapies are in development being the mucosectomy with band and ablation of the esophagogastric junction with hybrid argon plasma options widely available that can offer a viable therapeutic option for patients with difficult control of symptoms or those who does not want to receive continuous medical treatment or surgical treatment. The aims of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this new techniques in the management or gastroesophageal reflux disease without hiatal hernia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a disease with high global prevalence, reaching rates of 19.6 and 40% in our country, for which it is one of the most common reasons for medical care and although a clinical response is obtained in an 80-90% of patients with the use of proton pump inhibitors, the rest of the patients represents a medical challenge; surgical and endoscopic treatment being within the treatment options, the former having a high related morbidity (perforation, vagal nerve injury, postoperative dysphagia, etc), its duration is suboptimal and a second operation is associated with more surgical complications and morbidity, as well as a greater possibility of early therapeutic failure. For all these reasons, new endoluminal therapies have begun to be planned, including transoral fundoplication and radiofrequency ablation of the esophagogastric junction, these with controversial results and with the need of the use of special accessories and instruments that are not widely available; mucosectomy with band and ablation of the esophagogastric junction with hybrid argon plasma are widely available procedures in medical centers, offering a viable therapeutic option for patients with difficult control of symptoms or those who does not want to receive continuous medical treatment or surgical treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Mexico
      • Mexico City, Mexico, 06700
        • Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI Hospital de Especialidades

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of both sexes over 18 years and under 90 years with a diagnosis of GERD and who are under medical treatment and who do not want surgical treatment.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of GERD as follows:

Positive pHmetry. Positive endoscopy (Esophagitis grade C, D, stenosis or EB)

  • Esophagogastric junction Hill I-III
  • Total or partial response to proton pump inhibitors
  • Patient who does not wish to take medication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in the long term or indefinitely or refractory GERD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not accept the signature of the informed consent
  • Postoperative fundoplication patients for GERD
  • Patients with extraesophageal symptoms.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Patients with hiatal hernia larger than 3 cm or Hill type IV.
  • Patients with major esophageal motility disorders.
  • Patients with portal hypertension and presence of esophageal varices
  • Patients with hemophilia or some haematological disorder that is difficult to control
  • Patients with malignant pathology of the esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Hybrid argon plasma.
After diagnostic endoscopy investigators will proceed to use argon plasma probe for marking 270 grades around the esophagogastric junction preserving part of the mucosa towards the greater curvature, then investigators will use the jet included in the argon plasma probe with effect 20 to 40 system for the injection of the background submucosa in the marking area, applying 0.9% saline solution with methylene blue, to achieve adequate Submucosal elevation for application or argon plasma with high voltages (100 watts, 1.5 liters / min) using forced coagulation mode, applying plasma argon to 1cm above the Z line in the esophageal mucosa and 2cm below it towards the gastric mucosa, argon will be applied until a "carbonization" effect of the mucosa is achieved, once the application of the therapy is performed mucosal lavage and immersion technique to corroborate integrity and continuity of the gastrointestinal tract and rule out immediate complications
Procedure: Ablation of the gastroesophageal junction with hybrid argon plasma
In the management group with argon plasma hybrid after marking 270 degrees of the esophagogastric junction, submucosal elevation and argon plasma burn of the marked and elevated area is performed.
Other Names:
  • ARAT
Active Comparator: Band mucosectomy
After diagnostic endoscopy investigators will proceed to use the tip of a polypectomy snare for marking 270 grades around the esophagogastric junction preserving part of the mucosa towards the greater curvature, then investigators will perform submucosal elevation with the injection of 0.9% saline with carmine indigo and adrenaline 1:10000, after adequate submucosal elevation investigators will proceed with the help of a band ligation cap to suction and release the elastic band in the previously marked and elevated tissue, proceeding to resect the previously ligated tissue with polypectomy loop below the elastic band with forced coagulation (Effect 2, 40 W), until the marked mucosa is completely resected (average used of 5 elastic bands, reviewing the work area for complications like bleeding or perforation.
Procedure: mucosectomy with band of the gastroesophageal junction
In the management group with mucosectomy after marking 270 degrees of the esophagogastric junction, a submucosal elevation of the marked area is performed to subsequently perform ligation and resection with a hot snare below the ligation area.
Other Names:
  • ARMS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
efficacy of management with ARAT and ARMS in reducing the total percent acid exposure time
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
the investigators will compare the percentage of improvement in esophageal Ph metry before and after procedure
3, 6 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Oscar V Hernandez Mondragon, MD, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 22, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R-2019-3601-179

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings