Evaluation of the Acceptability and Efficacy of 10 Micrograms of Estradiol Vaginal Tablets vs Promestriene Vaginal Cream

February 10, 2021 updated by: Instituto Palacios
Evaluation of the Acceptability and Efficacy of 10 Micrograms of Estradiol Vaginal Tablets vs Promestriene Vaginal Cream in postmenopausal women aged 45 years or older, with one or more moderate to severe symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy (dryness, dyspareunia, soreness or irritation).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain, 28009
        • Instituto Palacios

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postmenopausal women aged 45 years or older. Women will be considered postmenopausal with more than 12 months since last menstrual period
  • Women who have read and signed the Informed Consent Form
  • Women with an intact uterus
  • One or more vaginal symptoms (dryness, soreness, irritation, dyspareunia) rated as moderate to severe. Symptoms are moderate if the patient needs a treatment and feels discomfort. Symptoms are severe if the patient needs a treatment, and feels such a degree of discomfort that this could severely impact the subject's daily activities.
  • Blood estradiol concentration of 30 pg/ml or less .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who have not signed the Informed consent Form
  • Women who had a known or suspected history of breast carcinoma
  • Estrogen dependent neoplasia. Women with a known, past or suspected Estrogen-dependent malignant tumours such as endometrial or ovarian cancer
  • Positive or suspicious mammogram results
  • Any systemic malignant disease
  • Hormone therapy treatment (sex hormones or vaginal treatments or steroids) in the last three months
  • Women who had abnormal vaginal bleeding or uterine bleeding of unknown cause
  • Vaginal infection requiring treatment
  • Previous or current venous thromboembolism (deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) Untreated endometrial hyperplasia Known thrombophilic disorders (e.g. protein C, protein S, or antithrombin deficiency) Active or previous arterial thromboembolic disease (e.g. angina, myocardial infarction) Acute liver disease, or history of liver disease as long as liver function tests have failed to return to normal Known Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients Porphyria
  • Any serious disease or chronic condition that could interfere with study compliance
  • History of thrombolytic disorders
  • Use of vaginal contraceptives (DIU, vaginal ring…)
  • Participation in another clinical trial in the last three months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Estradiol 10 micrograms vaginal tablets
One tablet intravaginally once daily for two weeks. Thereafter one tablet twice per week with at least a 3-days interval between treatments to maintain therapeutic response.
Drug: Estradiol 10 MCG Vaginal Tablet [VAGIFEM]
To insert the tablets the patient must use the applicator provided in the way explained in the prospectus.
Active Comparator: Promestriene 10mg./g vaginal cream
One application once daily intravaginally for two weeks. Thereafter one application twice per week with at least a 3-days interval between treatments to maintain therapeutic response.
Drug: Promestriene Vaginal
To insert the cream the patient must use the applicator provided in the way explained in the prospectus.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vulvovaginal Symptoms
Time Frame: Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12
Percentage of patients with vulvovaginal atrophy that accept 17B-Estradiol vaginal tablets vs promestriene vaginal cream after 12 weeks
Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of relief of atrophic vaginitis symptoms using intensity ratings of none, mild, moderate or severe of dryness and dyspareunia.
Time Frame: Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12
Percentage of women that verify a relief of atrophic vaginitis dryness, dyspareunia, soreness and irritation symptoms in the questionnaires provided at Visit 1 and Visit 2 compared to intensity of those symptoms at screening visit.
Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12
Evaluation of changes in ph.
Time Frame: Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12
Percentage of women with changes in pH at Visit 1 and Visit 2 compared to Screening Visit. Comparison with the two groups
Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12
Evaluation of vaginal maturation index by Pap smear.
Time Frame: Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12
Percentage of woman with changes in vaginal maturation index by Pap smear at Visit 2 compared to Screening Pap smear and comparison between groups.
Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12
Evaluation of changes in soreness and irritation.
Time Frame: Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12
Percentage of women that verify a relief of atrophic vaginitis dryness, dyspareunia, soreness and irritation symptoms in the questionnaires provided at Visit 1 and Visit 2 compared to intensity of those symptoms at screening visit.
Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12
Occurrence of adverse events
Time Frame: Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12
Number of adverse events
Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12
Evaluation of endometrium thickness using vaginal ultrasound
Time Frame: Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12
Percentage of women with changes in endometrium thickness at Visit 2 compared to Screening Visit and comparison between groups
Change from Baseline, at week 4 and at week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Instituto Palacios

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Novo Nordisk A/S

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 10, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IP-AVV2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings