Project MiNT: Assessing the Impact of Food & Video-Based Nutrition Education on Patients With Poorly Controlled Diabetes

September 23, 2025 updated by: Thomas Jefferson University

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Impact of Medically Tailored Meals and Medical Nutrition Therapy Via Telehealth Among Patients With Poorly Controlled Diabetes

This pragmatic randomized controlled trial will assess the efficacy of medically tailored meals and medical nutrition therapy via telehealth on clinical outcomes for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. The goal of these interventions is to improve outcomes for patients with diabetes by impacting self-care behaviors and diet self-efficacy in the short and long term. This study leverages a unique health system and community group partnership to inform the utility of reimbursement for medically tailored meal programs and medical nutrition therapy, which would ultimately facilitate their scalability and sustainability within the healthcare system.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Despite the availability of evidence-based guidance and treatments, many patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) do not achieve optimal glycemic control. In prior work, patients with DM identified primary needs of improved access to food and nutrition education. Several innovative models for food services have emerged to address patient needs for improved healthy food access. Currently, select non-profit organizations across the U.S. deliver millions of medically-tailored meals (MTM) to patients with chronic illnesses, based on the premise that food can be as helpful as medicine in improving patient outcomes. While a handful of pilot studies have demonstrated success of MTM in reducing healthcare utilization and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among patients with DM, no randomized trials have assessed the sustained impact of MTM on long-term outcomes for patients with DM. Similarly, individual studies of medical nutrition therapy (MNT), which includes individualized nutrition education and counseling, have shown benefit for improving DM outcomes. However, uptake of MNT across health systems has historically been extremely limited because of patient logistical barriers to attending the in-person visits. MNT delivered by telehealth (tele-MNT) has potential to overcome these barriers. Our goal is to evaluate the effect of MTM, with and without additional tele-MNT, on outcomes for patients with poorly controlled type 2 DM. The investigators will conduct a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with patients who have poorly controlled DM. Outcomes of interest include change in HbA1c, cost effectiveness, weight, diabetes self-efficacy, self-care, diabetes quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Investigators will assess the efficacy of 1) MTM and 2) MTM + tele-MNT compared to usual care in reducing HbA1c at 3, 6 (primary outcome) and 12 months and the cost effectiveness of each intervention compared to usual care up to 12 months. Patient perspectives regarding experiences with MTM and MTM + tele-MNT will also be explored to gain a better understanding of potential factors contributing to treatment failure and success within each group. The proposed research is innovative because it develops and tests a novel tele-MNT intervention tailored to recipients of MTM, provides a comprehensive solution to patient-identified nutrition needs, includes complete utilization data provided by the HealthShare Exchange, and leverages a unique health system and community group partnership to improve sustainability and scalability. Study results will inform 1) provider and payor decisions regarding offering and covering these services; 2) how services should be structured for scalability; and 3) integration of these services into the larger care delivery system to reduce DM disparities.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
600

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Have type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM)
  2. Are 18 years or older of age
  3. English speaking
  4. Are a patient in the ED or inpatient at TJUH or Methodist Hospital
  5. Have a HbA1c >8% as assessed during enrollment screening
  6. Have a PCP or Endocrine provider
  7. Have access to a device (e.g., smartphone, tablet, computer with WiFi) that can support video visits
  8. Have access to an email account (either own or family member)
  9. Are able to keep food fresh for a week after delivery (e.g., not homeless) and reheat food using a microwave or oven
  10. Live in the MANNA service area

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have type 1 DM (to reduce confounding related to underlying differences in pathophysiology and primary treatment approaches (lifestyle change vs medication regimens) between type 1 and type 2 DM)
  2. Pregnant, planning to be pregnant, or currently breastfeeding, as these patients have unique nutritional requirements outside the MNT curriculum
  3. Does not eat by mouth (i.e. receives tube feeds or total parenteral nutrition [TPN])
  4. History of severe gastroparesis
  5. Has a life expectancy of less than one year, per clinician
  6. Inability to provide informed consent
  7. Psychiatric co-morbidity that would preclude study participation
  8. Major communication barriers such as visual or hearing impairment that would compromise the ability to participate in a video visit
  9. Lives in or is being discharged to a facility (incarcerated, IP rehab, nursing home)
  10. Currently receiving MTM from MANNA or another provider
  11. Have life threatening food allergies
  12. Currently participating in DM-I or PREVENT study
  13. Has 3 or more ED visits for alcohol or other substance use in past month

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Medically Tailored Meals (MTM)
Participants in this arm will receive MTM for 12 weeks. Meals will be prepared and delivered by MANNA, a non-profit organization that has provided MTM for patients with chronic illnesses in Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey since 1990. MANNA will deliver 21 complete meals to the patient's home each week, providing 45-60 grams of carbohydrates per meal for optimal glucose control based on ADA guidelines and 100% of overall nutritional requirements based on USDA guidelines. In addition, children and any senior dependents for whom the participant is the primary caregiver will receive meals for the entire 12 weeks for no additional cost, as this is standard of care of MANNA services. MANNA registered dieticians will cater the program to meet the specific needs (e.g., dietary restrictions, cultural preferences). Investigators will provide information on community resources in the area, including food resources, for all patients.
Other: Medically Tailored Meals
MTM are meals designed by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist to reflect appropriate dietary therapy according to evidence-based nutrition practice guidelines. They address medical diagnoses, symptoms, allergies, inability to chew or swallow, medication management, and side effects to ensure the best possible nutrition-related health outcomes.
Experimental: MTM + tele-Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)
Patients in this arm will receive MTM services as well as tele-MNT over 12 months. The tele-MNT intervention will be delivered by a registered dietician within the Jefferson endocrine clinic, with assistance by other endocrine dieticians and fellows. In the first months, video visits focus on supporting individuals who are not selecting, preparing or purchasing their own meals. As the end of MTM services approaches, the intervention shifts to focus on the transition from MTM to self-directed eating. Based on Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics recommendations, each participant's MNT will include the following core features: nutrition assessment, intervention, care coordination, monitoring and evaluation. The following will also be addressed: nutrition prescriptions, nutrient intake, energy intake, glycemic index and load, alcohol consumption and physical activity. The schedule includes individual visits in the first 6 months and monthly group session in months 7-12.
Other: Medically Tailored Meals
MTM are meals designed by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist to reflect appropriate dietary therapy according to evidence-based nutrition practice guidelines. They address medical diagnoses, symptoms, allergies, inability to chew or swallow, medication management, and side effects to ensure the best possible nutrition-related health outcomes.
Behavioral: Tele-Medical Nutrition Therapy (tele-MNT)
Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) is offered as a component of usual care in many health systems, and consists of individuals receiving nutrition education tailored to their unique medical needs. Tele-MNT is the use of video technology to deliver MNT.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Patients in this arm will receive usual services offered at Jefferson for patients with DM, which includes regular visits with a diabetes provider (primary care or endocrine), standard ADA information pamphlets and referral to 1) diabetes education classes and 2) nutrition counseling by dieticians and nurse practitioners. During routine office visits, providers reinforce messages about self-management and provide lists of local and national resources related to nutrition and diabetes self-management (e.g., diabetes.org). The standard of care at Jefferson for patients with DM is to begin with a single group MNT visit lasting from 60-90 minutes. Each participant's need for additional sessions and general time-frame for follow-up is individually determined following the group session, based on patient preference. Historically, only about 2% of the Jefferson population engages in these services, thus minimizing dilution of the effect of the tele-MNT.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in hemoglobin A1C for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in hemoglobin A1C for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who receive 1) medically tailored meals and 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy compared to usual care
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in hemoglobin A1C for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in hemoglobin A1C for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who receive 1) medically tailored meals and 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy compared to usual care
3 months
Change in hemoglobin A1C for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in hemoglobin A1C for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who receive 1) medically tailored meals and 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy compared to usual care
12 months
Intervention costs of 1) medically tailored meals, 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy, and 3) usual care
Time Frame: 6 months
Cost of delivering usual care and MTM will be obtained from administrative billing data. Cost of delivering tele-MNT will be obtained from data logs which capture time preparing and delivering sessions.
6 months
Intervention costs of 1) medically tailored meals, 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy, and 3) usual care
Time Frame: 12 months
Cost of delivering usual care and MTM will be obtained from administrative billing data. Cost of delivering tele-MNT will be obtained from data logs which capture time preparing and delivering sessions.
12 months
Healthcare costs
Time Frame: 6 months
Total participant health care cost will be obtained from the Healthshare Exchange of Southeast Pennsylvania (HSX), the regional health information exchange, or Jefferson billing and claims data. HSX captures administrative billing information (i.e., claims) for outpatient care, emergency department care, inpatient care, and post-acute care and prescription drugs.
6 months
Healthcare costs
Time Frame: 12 months
Total participant health care cost will be obtained from the Healthshare Exchange of Southeast Pennsylvania (HSX), the regional health information exchange, or Jefferson billing and claims data. HSX captures administrative billing information (i.e., claims) for outpatient care, emergency department care, inpatient care, and post-acute care and prescription drugs.
12 months
Health care quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: 6 months
Health utility will be measured using the EQ-5D-5L, which measures health-related quality of life by assessing 5 dimensions on a scale from 1-5. A summary index score is derived by applying an appropriate value set to the responses. The value sets provide weights to each health dimensions according to the preferences of the general population of a country or region. These values sets have been developed and verified by the EuroQol Research Foundation.
6 months
Health care quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: 12 months
Health utility will be measured using the EQ-5D-5L, which measures health-related quality of life by assessing 5 dimensions on a scale from 1-5. A summary index score is derived by applying an appropriate value set to the responses. The value sets provide weights to each health dimensions according to the preferences of the general population of a country or region. These values sets have been developed and verified by the EuroQol Research Foundation.
12 months
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Time Frame: 6 months
The ICER is the measure of cost-effectiveness. It is calculated as the difference in cost (health care costs + intervention costs) between two strategies divided by the difference in health care related quality of life between two strategies.
6 months
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Time Frame: 12 months
The ICER is the measure of cost-effectiveness. It is calculated as the difference in cost (health care costs + intervention costs) between two strategies divided by the difference in health care related quality of life between two strategies.
12 months
Change in weight for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in weight for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who receive 1)medically tailored meals and 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy compared to usual care
3 months
Change in weight for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in weight for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who receive 1)medically tailored meals and 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy compared to usual care
6 months
Change in weight for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in weight for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who receive 1)medically tailored meals and 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy compared to usual care
12 months
Change in diabetes self-efficacy for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus as measured by The Diabetes Self Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in diabetes self-efficacy for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who receive 1) medically tailored meals and 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy compared to usual care. The Diabetes Self Efficacy Scale is made up of 8 questions, all scored on a 10-point Likert scale. Each questions asks about the respondent's confidence in performing an activity relative to diabetes. A response of 10 indicates total confidence, while a response of 1 indicates no confidence. The score for the scale is the mean of the eight items. Higher numbers are indicative of higher self-efficacy.
6 months
Change in diabetes self-efficacy for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus as measured by The Diabetes Self Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in diabetes self-efficacy for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who receive 1) medically tailored meals and 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy compared to usual care. The Diabetes Self Efficacy Scale is made up of 8 questions, all scored on a 10-point Likert scale. Each questions asks about the respondent's confidence in performing an activity relative to diabetes. A response of 10 indicates total confidence, while a response of 1 indicates no confidence. The score for the scale is the mean of the eight items. Higher numbers are indicative of higher self-efficacy.
12 months
Change in self-care for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus as measured by the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA)
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in self-care for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who receive 1) medically tailored meals and 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy compared to usual care. The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) is a survey made up of 11 questions, all scored on a 7-point scale. Each question asks how many days in the last 7 days a diabetes related task was performed. The scale represents the number of days per week this task was performed and the respondent indicates the frequency with which they performed these tasks. The SDSCA assess five regimen areas: General Diet, Specific Diet, Exercise, Blood-Glucose Testing, Foot Care, and Smoking Status. Scores are calculated for each of the five regimen areas by finding the mean number of days each task was performed within each regimen. Higher scores indicate better management of diabetes self-care activities.
6 months
Change in self-care for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus as measured by the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA)
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in self-care for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who receive 1) medically tailored meals and 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy compared to usual care. The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) is a survey made up of 11 questions, all scored on a 7-point scale. Each question asks how many days in the last 7 days a diabetes related task was performed. The scale represents the number of days per week this task was performed and the respondent indicates the frequency with which they performed these tasks. The SDSCA assess five regimen areas: General Diet, Specific Diet, Exercise, Blood-Glucose Testing, Foot Care, and Smoking Status. Scores are calculated for each of the five regimen areas by finding the mean number of days each task was performed within each regimen. Higher scores indicate better management of diabetes self-care activities.
12 months
Change in diabetes quality of life for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus as measured by Diabetes Quality of Life (DQoL) instrument
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in diabetes quality of life for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who receive 1) medically tailored meals and 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy compared to usual care. The Diabetes Quality of Life (DQoL) instrument is made up of 15 questions, all scored on a 5-point Likert scale assessing either frequency (never - all the time) or satisfaction (very satisfied - very dissatisfied). Higher scores on DQOL items indicate higher frequency of negative impact of diabetes or higher dissatisfaction with diabetes care and quality of life.
6 months
Change in diabetes quality of life for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus as measured by Diabetes Quality of Life (DQoL) instrument
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in diabetes quality of life for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who receive 1) medically tailored meals and 2) medically tailored meals + telehealth-delivered medical nutrition therapy compared to usual care. The Diabetes Quality of Life (DQoL) instrument is made up of 15 questions, all scored on a 5-point Likert scale assessing either frequency (never - all the time) or satisfaction (very satisfied - very dissatisfied). Higher scores on DQOL items indicate higher frequency of negative impact of diabetes or higher dissatisfaction with diabetes care and quality of life.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Thomas Jefferson University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Rutgers University
West Chester University of Pennsylvania

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 21, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 9, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 9, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 23, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 19F.258

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings