PRECISE: Pancreatic Cancer and Exercise

February 15, 2024 updated by: Gillian Prue, Queen's University, Belfast

PRECISE: PancREatic Cancer and Individualised Supervised Exercise: a Feasibility Study

The purpose of this study is to establish the feasibility of delivering a prescribed, individualised supervised aerobic and resistance exercise programme during adjuvant therapy, to improve survival and reduce symptom burden in pancreatic cancer

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common malignancy of the pancreas, representing 90% of all pancreatic neoplasms. The late presentation of symptoms and a lack of effective screening methods, means a large proportion (80-90%) are diagnosed with unresectable advanced disease, contributing to an unfavorable prognosis and dismal 5-year survival rate of ~5%. Intensive cancer treatments (i.e. surgery and chemotherapy) have debilitating complications including fatigue, pain and impaired physical function. Therefore, the maintenance of physical function and quality of life are seen as primary treatment goals for pancreatic patients, particularly during adjuvant therapy. Exercise training is emerging as an accepted component of patient care and evidence suggests regular exercise may induce an array of physiological and psychosocial benefits. However, there is a lack of evidence on the feasibility of delivering supervised exercise interventions to individuals with resectable PDAC undergoing adjuvant therapy. This study aims to explore the initial feasibility of delivering a supervised, individualized, and progressive concurrent exercise intervention to individuals with resectable PDAC who are undergoing adjuvant therapy, and provide data required to design a future randomized controlled trials.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
8

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • Belfast, United Kingdom, BT5 5JU
        • Belfast City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥ 18 years
  • histologically proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  • complete macroscopic resection (R0 or R1 resection)
  • patients recovering from surgery in time for chemotherapy to be delivered with adjuvant intent
  • prior malignancy active within the previous 3 years other than locally curable cancers that have been apparently cured, such as basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, or carcinoma in situ of the prostate, cervix, or breast
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • deemed medically fit by treating team to participate in exercise programme
  • able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Macroscopically remaining tumour (R2 resection or tumour node metastasis (TNM) stage IV disease)
  • Pre-existing cardiac conditions; Congestive heart failure or recent serious cardiovascular event
  • Chest pain while undertaking physical activity
  • Any related co-morbidities (diabetes; unstable angina; degenerative neuromuscular disease; mental health disorders; substance abuse)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Supervised aerobic and resistance exercise
16 weeks of supervised, moderate intensity, aerobic and resistance exercise. Aerobic exercise will be completed supervised, 2 days per week, commencing with a single 10 minute bout and progressing to 30 minutes of continuous aerobic exercise. Resistance exercises will involve whole body activities and commence with 1 set of each exercise (6-12 repetitions) and progress to 3 sets. The resistance exercises will gradually progress in difficulty throughout the program and will utilise daily undulating periodisation
Other: Exercise
Exercise programs will be individually tailored to the capabilities of each participant and gradually progressed accordingly. Each patient will be asked to complete one home-based aerobic exercise sessions each week. At baseline, 16 weeks and 3 month followup patients will complete a physical fitness assessment (30 second sit to stand and six minute walking tests) and a range of quality of life questionnaires. Upon completion of the 16 week exercise intervention, patients will be invited to partake in semi-structured interviews to determine the effectiveness of the program and their experience throughout.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility - recruitment: number of participants that agree to participate or are excluded
Time Frame: At baseline
The number of participants that agree to participate or are excluded
At baseline
Feasibility - attrition: number of participants that withdraw from the study
Time Frame: At conclusion of the 16 week exercise intervention
The number of participants that withdraw from the study
At conclusion of the 16 week exercise intervention
Feasibility - adherence to the exercise intervention: percentage of participants adhering to the exercise intervention
Time Frame: At conclusion of the 16 week exercise intervention
Determine the percentage of participants adhering to the exercise intervention
At conclusion of the 16 week exercise intervention
Feasibility - participant experience: semi-structured interviews
Time Frame: At conclusion of the 16 week exercise intervention
Determined by qualitative evaluation, using semi-structured interviews to assess experiences, accessibility and acceptability of the exercise intervention
At conclusion of the 16 week exercise intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anthropometric assessment
Time Frame: At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Height will be measured in cm and body weight in k, which will be combined to report BMI in kg/m (squared).
At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Hip and waist circumference analysis
Time Frame: At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Hip and waist circumference will be measured in cm.
At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Functional muscle endurance assessment
Time Frame: At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
The amount of repetitions achieved during a 30 second sit-to-stand test will be recorded.
At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Physical fitness assessment
Time Frame: At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Distance covered in meters during a six minute walk test will be recorded.
At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Perceived physical activity levels
Time Frame: At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Patients will complete an International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF). This questionnaire will comprise 4 generic items to obtain comparable health-related physical activity. Patients will detail the number of days, hours and minutes that they undertake (1) vigorous exercise (2) moderate exercise (3) walking exercise and (4) sitting. Total physical activity will be generated and monitored for improvement or decline. Higher reported scores indicate higher levels of self-reported physical activity.
At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Cancer-related fatigue by questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Fatigue will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) questionnaire. Patients will score several fatigue items over the past 7 days on a scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much), generating a total (0 - 52) with higher scores linked to greater quality of life.
At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Patient rated pain by questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Pain will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Pain is scored on a scale 0 - 10, with higher scores indicating higher pain levels.
At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Well-being by questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Quality of life will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire. This questionnaire is scored on a scale of 0 - 4, with 0 indicating not at all, and 4 indicating very much. Higher scores indicate poorer quality of life.
At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Health related quality of life by questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Quality of life will be measured by the EuroQOL Five Dimension Questionnaire (EQ5D). Patients will select a level of difficulty (I have no - I have extreme) on that particular days health for mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort and anxiety / depression. Patients will then rate 'how good' or 'how bad' their health is on that day using a 100 point scale (0 = worst health you can imagine; 100 = best health you can imagine).
At baseline, 16 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Health economics
Time Frame: At 16 weeks
Health resource use will be evaluated by a Health Economics Questionnaire
At 16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Queen's University, Belfast

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust
Pancreatic Cancer UK

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Richard Turkington, MD, Queens University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 15, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B19/35

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings