Dose-response of Talus Mobilizations (ANKLE_ROM)
Dose-response of Posterior Talus Mobilizations on Ankle Range of Motion and Overall Mobility in Older Adults
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Valencia, Spain, 46010
- Universidad de Valencia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Community-dwelling older adults
- Over 60 years
- Limited ankle dorsiflexion range of motion
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not willing to participate or signing a consent form
- Lower limb injury in the three months prior to the study (ex. sprain)
- Diagnosed condition that may influence mobility assessments (i.e. stroke)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: One session
One session of talus posteriorization
|
Three sets of a 30-s grade IV mobilization
|
|
Experimental: Two sessions
Two sessions of talus posteriorization
|
Three sets of a 30-s grade IV mobilization
|
|
Experimental: Three sessions
Three sessions of talus posteriorization
|
Three sets of a 30-s grade IV mobilization
|
|
Experimental: Four sessions
Four sessions of talus posteriorization
|
Three sets of a 30-s grade IV mobilization
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment dose
Time Frame: Change from baseline to end of intervention (2 weeks)
|
Number of sessions of experimental intervention needed to induce a clinically important gain in ankle mobility after the intervention.
A baseline progression over 4.6º in the Lunge test will be considered clinically important (Powden, 2015), so that the number of sessions will be established when this threshold is exceeded (see secondary outcome) .
|
Change from baseline to end of intervention (2 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Lunge test
Time Frame: Change from baseline, to end of intervention (2 weeks) and follow-up (10 weeks)
|
Weight bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion.
This test will measure the maximum tilt of the tibia that a subject can perform while standing and bearing the weight on the limb without lifting the heel from the floor.
A Baseline® Digital Inclinometer (Fabrication Enterprises Inc) will be used to assessed this outcome.
Values below 35º indicate limited mobility.
A baseline progression over 4.6º will be considered clinically important (Powden, 2015).
This mobility gain will be used to determine the dose-response relationship: number of sessions of talus mobilizations needed to induce a clinically important gain in ankle mobility after the intervention (see primary outcome measure)
|
Change from baseline, to end of intervention (2 weeks) and follow-up (10 weeks)
|
|
Active ankle range of motion
Time Frame: Change from baseline, to end of intervention (2 weeks) and follow-up (10 weeks)
|
Non-weight bearing active ankle range of motion in the sagittal plane: dorsi to plantarflexion full range of motion.
This will be assessed with a telescopic goniometer, with the participant laying in supine with a wedge under the knees to eliminate the tension of the gastrocnemius muscles.
Values below 59º indicate limited ankle mobility.
The minimal detectable change for this measure has not been well established in literature.
A baseline progression over 5.2º will be considered clinically important (Searle, 2018; Konor, 2012)
|
Change from baseline, to end of intervention (2 weeks) and follow-up (10 weeks)
|
|
Timed up and go test (TUG)
Time Frame: Change from baseline, to end of intervention (2 weeks) and follow-up (10 weeks)
|
A timed test used to assess overall mobility and dynamic balance, in which the time taken to get up from and arm-chair, walk three meters, turn around a cone and come back to sit again, is registered to estimate the functional mobility.
We will consider times below 12 s as normal performances in the study populattion, and below 13,5 s as low risk of falling.
A baseline change over 2.08 s will be considered clinically important (Donoghue, 2019)
|
Change from baseline, to end of intervention (2 weeks) and follow-up (10 weeks)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Euro Quality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: Change from baseline, to follow-up (10 weeks)
|
The descriptive system comprises five dimensions to assess health related quality of life: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions.
This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension.
The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state
|
Change from baseline, to follow-up (10 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: David Hernández-Guillén, PT, PhD, University of Valencia
- Study Director: José-María Blasco, PT, PhD, University of Valencia
- Principal Investigator: Catalina Tolsada-Velasco, PT, University of Valencia
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DHG05
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.