Hydroxychloroquine in Combination With Sirolimus and Dexamethasone for Treating COVID-19 Patients (COVID19-HOPE)

May 25, 2022 updated by: Iyad Sultan, King Hussein Cancer Center

Hydroxychloroquine in Combination With Sirolimus and Dexamethasone for Treating COVID-19 PatiEnts: A Pilot, Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Trial

COVID-19 caused an unprecedented international crisis. There is an urgent need for an effective regimen to cure this illness. Anecdotal data and some prospective results suggested a role of antimalarial drugs (chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine) in the treatment of this disease with best available data showing value of adding azithromycin. Based on drug repurposing studies done by our team and others, we identified the autophagy/apoptosis pathway as a major target for intervention. Based on in-silico and in-vitro models, sirolimus was identified as the drug that deserves urgent prioritization. The rational for combining sirolimus and hydroxychloroquine is explained in details in the study background below and a short video prepared by study PI (https://youtu.be/-zlOMXJp2hg). The evidence for using sirolimus for influenza is emphasized by a RCT that showed reduction of mechanical ventilation time by 50% (7 days on sirolimus arm vs 15 days on oseltamivir/steroids arm). Safe administration in human subjects is illustrated by multiple phase I/II clinical trials, performed in patients with cancer. COVID19-HOPE trial will randomize patients to 2 arms: HCQ/AZ (Arm A) and HCQ/SIR (Arm B). The main inclusion criteria is an RT-PCR test confirming infection with SARS-CoV-2 along with objective clinical criteria of disease (fever, tachypnea and/or hypoxemia). The primary endpoint of study will be Time To Clinical Improvement (TTCI), defined as time from randomization to resolution of the clinical features mentioned above (no fever, no tachypnea and no hypoxemia). In addition, secondary endpoints will include clinical failure by day 28 (need for intubation and/or death), QT interval prolongation, and adverse events. The estimated NNT based on Wilcoxon Mann Whitney comparison of TTCI in study arms is 58 patients (29 each arm). The study includes an adaptive plan, meaning that after different time points the study results will be evaluated and the NNT and randomization scheme (1:1 vs. others) will be evaluated and submitted to the IRB. Also, if one arm proves to be of no value, another regimen might be introduced based on available data. The study will recruit patients for a year and once approved by IRB and JFDA attempts to recruit other centers will be made (including national and regional centers).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Jordan
      • Amman, Jordan
        • King Hussein Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and non-pregnant female patients 18 years of age or older
  • Positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2.
  • Fever (oral T≥39 C within 24 hours of enrollment), Tachypnea (resting respiratory rate ≥ 28/min) and/or Oxygen saturation (Sao2) ≤ 93% on room air.
  • Ability to read, understand and sign IRB approved informed consent
  • Patients on HCQ or HCQ/AZ already are eligible for randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Weight < 40 kg.
  • Pregnant (positive β-human chorionic gonadotropin test, β-HCG) or lactating female at the screening.
  • Subjects with a history of retinopathy, sickle cell disease or trait, psoriasis, porphyria, history of splenectomy, mental illness or uncontrolled seizures disorder, liver cirrhosis, end-stage renal disease or need for renal replacement therapy, Decompensated heart failure, known active tuberculosis or history of incompletely treated tuberculosis, uncontrolled systemic bacterial or fungal infections, active viral infection other than COVID-19, Patients on chronic immunosuppression for other medical conditions such as rheumatological disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, or in patients with organ transplants.
  • Allergy to any of the study medications.

  • Drug-Drug interaction (after consulting with study PI). For example:

    • Drugs that may interact and alter HCQ level: ampicillin, cimetidine, digoxin, statins, cyclosporine, warfarin, fluconazole, within 2 weeks of dosing start, and during the duration of the study.
    • Drugs that may interact and alter SIR level: rifampicin, azole antifungals, phenytoin, diltiazem, verapamil, nicardipine, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, within 2 weeks of dosing start, and during the duration of the study.
  • Any abnormal baseline laboratory screening tests listed below (Exceptions by study PI may apply if reason explained)
  • Liver Child-Pugh grade C (table is included in the study)
  • Creatinine >1.5 mg/dl.
  • Hemoglobin for males <12 g/dl and females <10 g/dl.
  • Platelet count of <100 X 103/L.
  • Cardiac assessment:
  • Patients with baseline corrected QT >450 msec.
  • Patients with decompensated heart failure or acute myocardial infarction within the past 30 days of infection.
  • Patients with HypoKalemia (<3.5 mg/dl), HypoCalcemia (<8.0 mg/dl), HypoMagnesemia (<1.6mg/dl) will be included after correction.
  • Advanced respiratory support (high flow oxygen ≥ 15 L/min, CPAP, non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation)
  • Any other significant finding based on the judgment of the PI would increase the risk of having an adverse outcome from participating in this study.
  • Patients that lack decision-making capacity will not be approached to participate in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Study Arm A (HCQ & AZ)
Subjects will receive HCQ 600mg PO X 10 days and AZ PO 250mg DAILY X 10 days.
Drug: HCQ & AZ vs HCQ+SIR
Subjects will receive either Hydroxychloroquine with Azithromycin or Hydroxychloroquine with Sirolimus
Other Names:
  • Hydroxychloroquine+Azithromycin
  • Hydroxychloroquine+Sirolimus
EXPERIMENTAL: Study Arm B (HCQ+SIR)
Subjects will receive HCQ 600mg PO X 10 days and SIR 4mg PO X 1 day then 2mg PO DAILY X 9 days
Drug: HCQ & AZ vs HCQ+SIR
Subjects will receive either Hydroxychloroquine with Azithromycin or Hydroxychloroquine with Sirolimus
Other Names:
  • Hydroxychloroquine+Azithromycin
  • Hydroxychloroquine+Sirolimus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Clinical improvement (TTCI)
Time Frame: 28 Days
Time to clinical improvement (TTCI), defined as time from randomization to clinical improvement, defined as resolution of fever (oral T<38), respiratory rate(<24/min) and normalization of oxygen saturation (persistent pO2 ≥95% on RA). Assessment of clinical improvement should be confirmed on 2 consecutive days in patients who do not develop clinical failure. This outcome will be analyzed separately from clinical failure (i.e. patients with clinical failure will be excluded from TTCI calculation).
28 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical failure defined as death or need for Intubation and mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 28 Days
Proportion of patients who develop clinical failure, defined as death or need for mechanical ventilation within 28 days of enrollment or until discharge (whichever later).
28 Days
Adverse effects
Time Frame: 28 Days
Safety and tolerability, as assessed by the occurrence of adverse events in any of the study arms.
28 Days
QT interval prolongation
Time Frame: 28 Days
Any clinically significant increase of QT, defined as increased to over 500, or increase by 60 msec (putting the patient in over 450 msec). Proportion of patients with clinically significant increase will be used as an Outcome.
28 Days
Failure to continue assigned therapy
Time Frame: 28 Days
Proportion of patients who do not continue on assigned therapy will be calculated. Causes of failure to continue (drop-out) will be captured as well.
28 Days
Time to viral clearance
Time Frame: 28 Days
Viral RT-PCR will be performed per institutional guidelines. The time from randomization to first negative test (Which is not followed by a positive test) will be recorded.
28 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
King Hussein Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20 KHCC 74

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings