Converted Laparoscopic Resection of Upper Rectal Carcinoma T1-4 N0-1 in Obese Patients.

May 22, 2020 updated by: Bassem Mohamed Sieda, Zagazig University

Is There Better Oncological and Short Term Outcome for Laparoscopic Resection of Upper Rectal Carcinoma T1-4 N0-1 Over Laparoscopic Converted Cases in Obese Patients?

Background: laparoscopic resection (LAR) is a safe approach and widely used for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, but short term and oncological outcome for converted cases to open surgery (cLAR), may be questioned in an obese patient.

Objective: validating the short-term and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic resection and after conversion to open surgery for upper rectal cancer in obese patients.

Patients and methods: A prospective study included 191 patients, randomly allocated into two arms of the study, Arm I is open anterior resection (OAR), this is the control and arm II, The LAR. Only 156 analyzed.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Study design: A randomized control study assigned to involve obese patients with BMI 30 diagnosed with upper rectal carcinoma T1-4 N0-1, 181 patients assigned into two arms and operated in multi-centres in a tertiary hospitals.

Ethical approval and clinical registration: Our study was submitted, revised and finally permitted and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Zagazig University hospital, faculty of medicine, holding number IR-20780302-1, and informed consent was obtained from all participants agreed to be involved. Study registered in ClinicalTrial.gove: ID: ………

Protocol and setting:

A study was done in the period from December 2016 to December 2019 and data registered after each procedure in our database system The controlled arm included patients underwent open anterior resection (OAR) for upper rectal carcinoma and divided into Ia, underwent OAR and IIa, included patients with cLAR, whereas Group II included patients underwent LAR.

Method of randomization:

Randomization was done via a computer-generated protocol, already designed and uploaded in our database, and the results were unlabeled and sealed into envelopes. These envelopes were opened in the operating room by the head-nurse and an assistant surgery specialist who was not engaged in the study

Inclusion criteria:

Obese patients with BMI ≥27 with operable upper rectal carcinoma staged T1-4 N0-1 based on colonoscopy, endo-rectal ultrasound, CT abdomen and pelvis and MRI abdomen Exclusion criteria BMI less than 27, According to AJCC TNM staging 7th edition, N2-3 patients were excluded, any evidence of inoperability whether distant metastasis or invasive tumours, Patients with synchronous colorectal tumours, synchronous liver metastasis obstructive symptomatic patients and patients with intraoperative tumour rupture or perforation, rectal tumours below peritoneal reflection.

There are 2 parameters prospectively assessed and registered in our database: First the clinical parameters, second is the onco-pathological parameter Clinical parameter included, operative basic demographic data (age, sex and BMI), peri-operative clinical variables ( operative time, intraoperative complication, completeness of TME, the feasibility of stapling, causes of conversion if there, postoperative (PO) short term outcome, Recovery, hospital stay, PO morbidity and bowel function.

The onco-pathological outcome included: tumour site, site and staging of tumour according to TNM- longitudinal and circumferential resection margin- LN involved (N) - loco-regional recurrence and recurrence-free survival.

Intervention methods The preoperative nCRT: our protocol according to a multidisciplinary tumour board committee, is to give a long course of neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for mid and lower rectal cancer but upper rectum, we give a 4 weeks course of CRT, 45 Gy with systemic 5-fluorouracil based regimen infusion. This is proposed for stage II-III not stage I.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
156

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

26 years to 74 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Obese patients with BMI ≥27 with operable upper rectal carcinoma staged T1-4 N0-1 based on colonoscopy, endo-rectal ultrasound, CT abdomen and pelvis and MRI abdomen

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI less than 27, According to AJCC TNM staging 7th edition, N2-3 patients were excluded, any evidence of inoperability whether distant metastasis or invasive tumours, Patients with synchronous colorectal tumours, synchronous liver metastasis obstructive symptomatic patients and patients with intraoperative tumour rupture or perforation, rectal tumours below peritoneal reflection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR)
LAR group included 88 patients, 17 patients converted to open
Procedure: Anterior resection for upper rectal cancer in obese
Anterior resection for upper rectal cancer in obese
Active Comparator: open anterior resection
Open anterior resection for 56 patients
Procedure: Anterior resection for upper rectal cancer in obese
Anterior resection for upper rectal cancer in obese

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recovery time-intraoperative bleeding
Time Frame: up to 3 years
up to 3 years
Incidence of wound infection
Time Frame: up to 3 years
up to 3 years
hospital stay-perioperative length
Time Frame: up to 3 years
up to 3 years
oncological outcome
Time Frame: 3 years
total mesorectal excision, margin included or not
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
early locoregional recurrence
Time Frame: 6 months
early locoregional recurrence within 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Zagazig University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 11, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 29, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 18, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IR-20780302-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

through international publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 year

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

laparoscopic anterior resection for upper rectal cancer in obese patients

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer, Rectum

Clinical Trials on Anterior resection for upper rectal cancer in obese

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings