The Use of Sedation Drugs in the Procedure of Administering Surfactant Without Intubation (LISA/MIST) (LISA KGS)

January 16, 2022 updated by: PAWEL KRAJEWSKI, MD, Medical University of Warsaw

The Use of Sedation Drugs in the Procedure of Administering Surfactant Without Intubation (LISA/MIST): a Randomized Study Comparing Intravenous Ketamine With Sublingual 30% Glucose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and impact of intravenous ketamine or sublingual 30% glucose as sedation drugs used in preterm premature babies during the LISA procedure. The second goal is to compare the frequency of complications during LISA with both premedication regimens.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

All infants fulfilling the inclusion criteria during the 12 months recruitment window will potentially be enrolled in this randomized controlled trial of LISA premedication. Written informed consent will be acquired from parents or legal guardians. After the consent, infants needing the LISA will receive premedication as follows: caffeine citrate according to the clinical routine at study site, and randomly, either ketamine or sublingual glucose 30%. This study is a pilot study and 60 patients that will be randomized 1:1. Ketamine will be given in slow intravenous injection over 60 seconds. Glucose 30% will be given sublingually in the volume of 1 mL. After two minutes (from the end of administration of the study drug or reference drug), laryngoscopy will be started. To assess the effectiveness of both types of sedation, patients will be assessed using two pain assessment scales - the COMFORT scale and the FANS scale. 10 minutes before the procedure, the first assessment in the COMFORT and FANS scales will take place. The next assessment on both scales will take place during the procedure.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Paweł Krajewski, MD, PhD

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 minute to 4 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infant with established Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) or at risk for RDS
  • Gestational age 28 0/7 - 32 6/7 weeks
  • Non-invasive respiratory support with nasal CPAP (incl. BiPAP) or NIPPV
  • Need for administration of exogenous surfactant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Need for intubation and mechanical ventilation at the Delivery Room
  • Infant with clinically significant maxillo-facial, tracheal or pulmonary malformations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Ketamine sedated group
30 randomized patients will receive Ketamine 1 mg/kg , I.V. 2 minutes before LISA
Drug: Ketamine
Patient will be sedated using Ketamine 2 minutes before the LISA procedure. 10 minutes prior the procedure and during the procedure the patient's pain and/or discomfort will be evaluated using COMFORT and FANS scales
Active Comparator: Glucose sedated group
30 patients will receive Glucose 30% 1 mL, sublingually, 2 minutes before LISA
Drug: Glucose
Patient will be sedated using Glucose 2 minutes before the LISA procedure. 10 minutes prior the procedure and during the procedure the patient's pain and/or discomfort will be evaluated using COMFORT and FANS scales

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of patient sedation
Time Frame: First assessment 10 minutes before procedure, second during the procedure
Assessment of patient sedation change before and after LISA using COMFORT scale
First assessment 10 minutes before procedure, second during the procedure
Assessment of patient sedation
Time Frame: First assessment 10 minutes before procedure, second during the procedure
Assessment of patient sedation change before and after LISA using FANS scale
First assessment 10 minutes before procedure, second during the procedure
Comparing ketamine and glucose
Time Frame: Comparing the scores through study completion, an average of two years
Comparison of the effectiveness of sedation with ketamine and glucose using the FANS scale scores. The FANS scale ranges from 0 points at minimum to 10 points at maximum. The higher the score, the lower the sedation.
Comparing the scores through study completion, an average of two years
Comparing ketamine and glucose
Time Frame: Comparing the scores through study completion, an average of two years
Comparison of the effectiveness of sedation with ketamine and glucose using the COMFORT scale scores. The Comfort scale ranges from 8 points at minimum, to 40 at maximum. The higher the score, the lower the sedation level.
Comparing the scores through study completion, an average of two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of complications
Time Frame: During the procedure
Monitoring the possible side effects of used drugs
During the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of Warsaw

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Paweł Krajewski, MD, PhD, Medical University of Warsaw

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 16, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LISA KGS TRIAL 2020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial will be available, after de-identification. The study protocol will also be available. These documents will be accessible to anyone who provides a methodologically sound proposal immediately following publication with no end date.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Immediately following publication. No end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Anyone who provides a methodologically sound proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Ketamine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings