Comparison Between Two Types of Sedation for Elective Upper Endoscopy Procedures

May 26, 2020 updated by: Dr Gan Pek Li, University of Malaya

A Comparative Study Between Inhalational Sevoflurane Sedation With Intravenous Midazolam Sedation for Upper Endoscopy Procedure.

Sedation is defined as the act of administrating a sedative drug to produce a state of calm or sleep. Sedation is commonly given to a patient in hospital settings to provide a tolerable and pleasant experience by relieving anxiety, pain and discomfort, as well as to expedite the duration of the procedure. Moderate sedation (conscious sedation) is the preferred state of sedation, whereby self-maintenance of ventilation and hemodynamic stability is achieved.

The primary objective of this study is to determine if inhalational Sevoflurane is a more superior sedative agent in terms of faster psychomotor recovery and time taken to fulfil discharge criteria when compared with intravenous Midazolam sedation.

Secondary objective is to determine if inhalational Sevoflurane sedation has better patient's and endoscopist's satisfaction when compared with intravenous Midazolam sedation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A randomized controlled trial study was done on patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a single tertiary Centre in Malaysia. The study was approved by University Malaya Medical Centre medical research ethics committee. All patients gave written and informed consent. Patients were fasted, and three psychometric tests were performed as a baseline before sedation. Patients were randomly allocated to either receive IV Midazolam (Group M) or inhalational Sevoflurane (Group S) via nasal mask. Standard monitoring was applied. Patients in Sevoflurane group received the inhalational agent via a nasal mask with stepwise increment until and Observed Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale of 3 or maximum 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration was achieved. Patients in Midazolam group were given a stat dose of IV Midazolam 2.5mg. Both groups received 30mcg of IV Fentanyl and lignocaine 1% gargle prior to the procedure. The unblinded observer monitored the level of sedation and recorded the patient's vital signs. A second blinded observer performed the psychometric tests before and at the end of the procedure. He also recorded the time to fulfil discharge criteria as well as the satisfaction scores from the patient and endoscopist.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Malaysia
    • WP Kuala Lumpur
      • Kuala Lumpur, WP Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 59100
        • University Malaya Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I to II
  • Patients who are not taking sedative agents prior to procedure.
  • Patients who are able to give consent for the procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ischaemic heart disease, respiratory diseases and cerebrovascular disease.
  • Patients who are taking opioid or sedative medications 24 hours before procedure.
  • Patients with previous history of adverse effects to Sevoflurane or Midazolam.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Patients with airway obstructions.
  • Patients with features of difficult airway such as limited neck extension, small mouth opening of less than 3 cm, mallampati score of more than 3.
  • Patients who are at risk of aspiration. Impaired gag reflex, presence of neurological disorders and impaired physical mobility.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Group S (inhalational Sevoflurane sedation)

The inhalational anaesthetic agent and oxygen will be delivered via an anaesthetic circuit with a vaporizer (Sevotec 3, Ohmeda, Streeton UK) with a nasal mask.

Patients who are allocated for Sevoflurane will be given initial oxygen flow of 8L/min and then Sevoflurane was introduced at a concentration of 0.2% and was increased stepwise by 02% for every 30s up to a maximum of 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC; 2.05% end tidal). Patient's deepest sedation was recorded and adjusted to achieve optimal Observer's Assessment of Alertness/ Sedation Scale (OAAS) score of 3.

Inadequate or over sedation was treated by reducing or increasing the Sevoflurane concentration dial by 0.2 - 0.6% until the desired effect is reached.

Full vital signs monitoring are done for every participant
Drug: Sevoflurane

Incidence of side effects such as excitation, headache, apnea, airway obstructions are recorded. Patients who experiences severe excitation disinhibition as defined in the investigator's opinion as agitation. Uncontrollable patient movements that causes unsafe procedural conditions and conversion to general anaesthesia is needed

Post procedural recovery scoring are taken which includes:

  1. Time taken from the point that the procedure ended to the first OAAS score of 5
  2. Time taken from (a) to meeting discharge eligilibility

Pre and post procedure pyschometric test (delayed and immediate memory test, posting box test and Stroop test) will be done and compared by the blinded observer/investigator
Active Comparator: Group M (Intravenous Midazolam sedation)

Patients who are allocated for Midazolam will be given the similar nasal mask delivering 8L/min oxygen. However, Sevoflurane will not be introduced to these patients.

Midazolam is titrated slowly to achieve OAAS score of 3 but no more than 2.5mg is to be given within 2 minutes period to patients selected to be in Midazolam group.

Inadequate sedation is treated by giving slow titration of the medication based on the unblinded observer's judgement. Over sedation is treated by withholding the midazolam and continuing oxygen supplementation until the patient returned to the desired sedation level. No other sedative agents are allowed to be given to the patient or else patient will be excluded from this study.
Drug: Midazolam injection

Incidence of side effects such as excitation, headache, apnea, airway obstructions are recorded. Patients who experiences severe excitation disinhibition as defined in the investigator's opinion as agitation. Uncontrollable patient movements that causes unsafe procedural conditions and conversion to general anaesthesia is needed

Post procedural recovery scoring are taken which includes:

  1. Time taken from the point that the procedure ended to the first OAAS score of 5
  2. Time taken from (a) to meeting discharge eligilibility

Pre and post procedure pyschometric test (delayed and immediate memory test, posting box test and Stroop test) will be done and compared by the blinded observer/investigator.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychomotor recovery time
Time Frame: 30 minutes from completion of procedure
Pre procedure psychomotor tests baseline scores will be obtained and compared with post procedure scores. Time to achieve baseline recovery scores will be taken and used to compare between the two sedative agents.
30 minutes from completion of procedure
Time taken to fulfil discharge criteria
Time Frame: One day
Patient would have to fulfil a set of discharge criteria to ensure that patient is safe for discharge.
One day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient and endoscopists satisfaction
Time Frame: Post procedure on the same setting not more than one day duration
Patient will answer a set of questionnaires to gauge the satisfaction of the sedation agent. Endoscopists will score their satisfaction with a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 - 3 being (dissatisfied), 4-6 (satisfied), and 7 - 10 (very satisfied)
Post procedure on the same setting not more than one day duration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Malaya

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: PEK LI GAN, MBBS, University Malaya

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 26, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2018321-6154

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastro Esophageal Reflux

Clinical Trials on Sevoflurane

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings