Life With Phenylketonuria. Adult Neurological Outcome of PCU Screened Patients From 1971 to 2002. (PCU)

May 20, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Lille

Becoming Adulthood of Phenylketonuric Patients Screened in the Neonatal Period: From 1971 to the Present Day.

You were detected during the neonatal period for phenylketonuria and you benefited from the diagnosis of an adapted dietetic care, and this for a variable duration according to the recommendations followed at that time.

The recommendations for the management of phenylketonuria have evolved considerably over time, lengthening the duration, rigor of the diet and target rates. However, few studies have been able to determinate the influence of metabolic balance and pediatric management on fate in adulthood. As you know, the current recommendations are more stringent and prolonged, without taking into account the pediatric data of today's adult patients.

The objective of this study, which is aimed at all adult patients screened and followed by Lille University Hospital, according to the same care methods, allowing a homogeneous monitoring of patients, is to assess the influence of pediatric care (duration of the diet, metabolic balance, compliance) on the future in adulthood. This retrospective and current analysis work could help refine the current recommendations.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
42

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Lille, France
        • CHU de Lille

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All adult patients screened in Nord Pas de Calais for PKU in the neonatal period since 1971 and treated with a diet and / or drug treatment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with classic or atypical phenylketonuria detected in the neonatal period since 1971 in the department of Nord (59) and Pas de Calais (62).
  • Patients treated
  • Able to receive information
  • Patient beneficiary or affiliated to a social security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not screened (born outside French territory) or before 1971.
  • Untreated screened patients
  • Patients screened for persistent benign hyperphenylalaninaemia not treated with a diet (Phenylalanine level <10 mg / dl or 600 µmol / l without diet to be confirmed)
  • Associated confirmed neurological pathology other than a complication of phenylketonuria.
  • Refusal to participate in the assessment of Intellectual Quotient in adulthood
  • Patient screened, lost to follow-up, found, having moved to another region and not wishing to return to the CHU for follow-up.
  • Inability to receive information and or express opposition
  • Opposition to participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Adults Phenylketonuric
Adults patients screened in neonatal period for PKU and treated

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adult intelligence quotient (IQ) score
Time Frame: Baseline
Adult intelligence quotient (IQ) score assessed at the last setback in the two groups defined by the duration of the hypoprotidic diet during childhood
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The IQ score in adulthood assessed defined by the target Phenylalanine level in one subgroup treated during 8 years.
Time Frame: Baseline, at the last time of decline (= 8 years of low-protein diet)
The IQ score in adulthood assessed at the last time of decline according to the two subgroups treated during 8 years, defined by the target Phenylalanine level ((2-5 mg/dl versus 8-12 mg/dl)
Baseline, at the last time of decline (= 8 years of low-protein diet)
The IQ score in adulthood assessed according to the length of expanding the Diet (Phe intake) during childhood for children treated during 10 years (target Phe level 2-5 mg/dl)
Time Frame: Baseline,at the last time of decline (= 10 years of low-protein diet)
The IQ score in adulthood assessed according to length (and degree) of expanding the Diet (increasing Phe intake, during 6 months whatever the Phe levels or longer according the Phe levels) during childhood for children treated during 10 years (xith target Phe level 2-5 mg/dl)
Baseline,at the last time of decline (= 10 years of low-protein diet)
The IQ score in adulthood assessed defined by the metabolic biological parameters in childhood
Time Frame: Baseline
The IQ score in adulthood assessed at the last time of decline according to the metabolic parameters during childhood
Baseline
The IQ score in adulthood assessed according to the first phenylalanine level in the target (< 5 mg/dl)
Time Frame: baseline
The IQ score in adulthood assessed according to the first phenylalanine level in the target (< 5 mg/dl) in the neonatal period
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Lille

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Karine MENTION, MD,PhD, University Hospital, Lille

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 20, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2019_28
  • 2020-A00437-32 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB number,ANSM)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Phenylketonurias

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings