Genicular Artery Embolization (GAE) for Osteoarthritic Knee Pain

February 20, 2025 updated by: Andrew Picel

Genicular Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Osteoarthritic Knee Pain

The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the safety of the geniculate artery embolization (GAE) procedure with HydroPearl® Microspheres in 30 patients with knee pain caused by osteoarthritis with 24 months follow-up. The GAE procedure is an arterial embolization procedure that blocks abnormal blood vessels caused be knee arthritis in order to evaluate the effect on knee pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Provide informed consent
  2. Age ≥ 40 years
  3. Moderate to severe knee pain (VAS >40 mm)

  4. Pain refractory to 3 months of conservative treatments, including at least one of the following:

    • a. Anti-inflammatory medications
    • b. Physical therapy
    • c. Intra-articular injections
  5. Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grade 1, 2, or 3 disease
  6. MRI features of active synovitis (synovial thickening and/or enhancement on MRI).
  7. Ineligibility or refusal of surgical management.
  8. Local knee tenderness

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Rheumatoid or infectious arthritis
  2. Advanced lower extremity atherosclerosis that would limit selective angiography
  3. Local knee infection
  4. Prior knee surgery (excluding arthroscopic/meniscal interventions)
  5. Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR>1.8, platelets<50,000/µL)
  6. Iodine allergy resulting in anaphylaxis
  7. Chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >2 mg/dL)
  8. Life expectancy less than 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Genicular artery embolization

Participants will undergo the genicular artery embolization (GAE) procedure for the treatment of moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis. A total of 30 patients will be enrolled in the single treatment arm of the study.

The study will involve a screening period in which patient eligibility is determined. Once eligibility is confirmed, patients will undergo GAE with HydroPearl® Microspheres (polyethylene glycol microspheres, Terumo Medical, Somerset NJ). Following treatment, patients will undergo follow-up at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months post GAE.
Device: Genicular artery embolization (GAE)
Participants will undergo GAE with HydroPearl® Microspheres (polyethylene glycol microspheres, Terumo Medical, Somerset NJ).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with treatment related adverse events
Time Frame: 1 month post GAE
Adverse events will be evaluated for severity and graded following the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
1 month post GAE
Number of patients with treatment related adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months post GAE
Adverse events will be evaluated for severity and graded following the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
6 months post GAE
Number of patients with treatment related adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months post GAE
Adverse events will be evaluated for severity and graded following the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
12 months post GAE
Number of patients with treatment related adverse events
Time Frame: 24 months post GAE
Adverse events will be evaluated for severity and graded following the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
24 months post GAE

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change from baseline pain scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 month post GAE
Pain score measured using visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS is a numerical scale used to report pain intensity from 0 to 100. Subjects mark the scale with a vertical line to indicate their current pain level. 0 mm represents "no pain" and 100 mm represents "worse possible pain."
Baseline to 1 month post GAE
Mean change from baseline pain scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months post GAE
Pain score measured using visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS is a numerical scale used to report pain intensity from 0 to 100. Subjects mark the scale with a vertical line to indicate their current pain level. 0 mm represents "no pain" and 100 mm represents "worse possible pain."
Baseline to 6 months post GAE
Mean change from baseline pain scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months post GAE
Pain score measured using visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS is a numerical scale used to report pain intensity from 0 to 100. Subjects mark the scale with a vertical line to indicate their current pain level. 0 mm represents "no pain" and 100 mm represents "worse possible pain."
Baseline to 12 months post GAE
Mean change from baseline pain scores
Time Frame: Baseline 24 months post GAE
Pain score measured using visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS is a numerical scale used to report pain intensity from 0 to 100. Subjects mark the scale with a vertical line to indicate their current pain level. 0 mm represents "no pain" and 100 mm represents "worse possible pain."
Baseline 24 months post GAE
Mean change from baseline knee function scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 month post GAE
Knee function measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) scale. The WOMAC is a 24-question tool that is completed by the patient to evaluate osteoarthritis of the knee, including pain, stiffness, and physical function of the joints. There are 5 items regarding pain, 2 items for stiffness, and 17 items for physical function. Questions are ranked on a 5 point Likert scale. A score of "0" indicates no symptoms and "4" indicates severe symptoms. The individual scores are added and an overall higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Baseline to 1 month post GAE
Mean change from baseline knee function scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months post GAE
Knee function measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) scale. The WOMAC is a 24-question tool that is completed by the patient to evaluate osteoarthritis of the knee, including pain, stiffness, and physical function of the joints. There are 5 items regarding pain, 2 items for stiffness, and 17 items for physical function. Questions are ranked on a 5 point Likert scale. A score of "0" indicates no symptoms and "4" indicates severe symptoms. The individual scores are added and an overall higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Baseline to 6 months post GAE
Mean change from baseline knee function scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months post GAE
Knee function measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) scale. The WOMAC is a 24-question tool that is completed by the patient to evaluate osteoarthritis of the knee, including pain, stiffness, and physical function of the joints. There are 5 items regarding pain, 2 items for stiffness, and 17 items for physical function. Questions are ranked on a 5 point Likert scale. A score of "0" indicates no symptoms and "4" indicates severe symptoms. The individual scores are added and an overall higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Baseline to 12 months post GAE
Mean change from baseline knee function scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months post GAE
Knee function measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) scale. The WOMAC is a 24-question tool that is completed by the patient to evaluate osteoarthritis of the knee, including pain, stiffness, and physical function of the joints. There are 5 items regarding pain, 2 items for stiffness, and 17 items for physical function. Questions are ranked on a 5 point Likert scale. A score of "0" indicates no symptoms and "4" indicates severe symptoms. The individual scores are added and an overall higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Baseline to 24 months post GAE

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Andrew Picel

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew C Picel, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 15, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 57046
  • IDE G200111 (Other Identifier: FDA)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Genicular artery embolization (GAE)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings