Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation After HIV-Associated Stroke: Botswana

August 5, 2026 updated by: University of Pennsylvania
Today, nearly 37 million people are living with HIV (PLHIV) worldwide and 30 to 40% of them will have neurologic complications leading to disability. Our long-term working hypothesis is that an effective solution for increasing rehabilitation access in Botswana and improving functional outcomes of PLHIV having experienced a stroke with or without HIV uses an affordable robot and mobile health technologies to create a cost-effective intervention strategy. For this project, we test the feasibility of affordable robot therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

We will test the feasibility of affordable robot therapy in three Aims. In Aim 1, we will optimize for the Botswana context, an affordable technology-based robot system with four exercise stations. We will optimize a prototype of our provisionally patented robot gym system, REHAB CARES, for therapy. Optimization will include increasing cost-effectiveness, utilizing more local resources and manufacturing, and using mobile health android platforms for games and data acquisition. In Aim 2, the efficiency of the newly modified robot system compared to standard of care will be assessed using 30 patients who have experienced a stroke, with or without HIV, will be recruited from those who are being treated by Princess Marina Hospital (PMH) and living in the surrounding community. They will receive therapy using the robot gym system and receive standard of care. We will assess functional outcomes including motor impairment, function, and quality of life. The study outcomes would then inform rehabilitation practices for PLHIV with stroke, with or without HIV, and suggest that affordable technology-mediated rehabilitation can reduce their motor dysfunction and resulting long-term disability.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Botswana
      • Gaborone, Botswana
        • University of Botswana
  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19146
        • Penn Medicine Rittenhouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of Stroke (at least 3 months post incident) with or without HIV, age over 18;
  • medically stable (Able to tolerate therapy and given the determination as able to go through protocol by physician);
  • have neurological function between 5 and 24 as defined by the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS);
  • have no less than moderate cognitive function as defined by the International HIV-Dementia Scale
  • Able to give consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to give consent;
  • severely depressed (Becks Depression Inventory-Fast Screener);
  • experiencing excessive pain (Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score greater than 4);
  • have severe spasticity ( than 3) in muscle tone in elbow/shoulder/wrist hip/knee/ankle using the Ashworth Scale;
  • have total paralysis or muscular contractures of upper or lower extremity;
  • have a history of psychiatric disorder or cardiac problems;
  • have a history of prior brain injury including lesions to the cerebella or brain stem;
  • have open lesions on the upper or lower limbs;
  • It is up to the physician to decide if a subject should be excluded due to severe drug and/or alcohol abuse or taking of medication that would impair cognitive ability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Low-to-mid functioning HIV/AIDS patients
Low-to-mid functioning HIV/AIDS patients greater than 18 years of age with stroke co-morbidity.
Other: Robot Therapy
Robot Therapy
Other: Stroke survivors
Stroke survivors greater than 18 years of age with hemiplegia with and without HIV/AIDS.
Other: Robot Therapy
Robot Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified IBM Usability Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 8 Weeks
Assess usability of the robot system with patients and therapists
At 8 Weeks
Change in Baseline assessment of motor impairment
Time Frame: At week 8
The Fugl-Meyer measure of motor impairment in the upper limb. Max is 66. Min 0; higher is better. up to 30 minutes to complete
At week 8
Rehabilitation Capacity Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 0 week
Survey for all therapists and rehab professionals - up to 1 hour; interview
At 0 week
Change from baseline assessment of Timed up and go
Time Frame: at 8 weeks
Timed up and go - Measure gait capacity. Measured is minutes. Longer times indicate higher impairment.
at 8 weeks
Change from baseline assessment of 10 Meter Walk Test
Time Frame: at 8 weeks
Measure gait distance capacity. Measured in meters. Longer distance means lower impairment.
at 8 weeks
Change from baseline assessment of # of blocks that can be grasped and moved
Time Frame: at 8 weeks
Box and Block Test is a reach and grasp test - gross motor function. Measured in # of blocks. Higher number of blocks means lower impairment.
at 8 weeks
Change from baseline assessment of fine motor grasp
Time Frame: at 8 weeks
Grooved Peg-Board Test is measure of fine motor grasp. Measured in times and number of pins placed. More pins placed means lower impairment.
at 8 weeks
Change from baseline assessment of stroke impact scale
Time Frame: at 8 weeks
quality of life questionnaire; self-reported. The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) assesses other dimensions of health related quality of life: emotion, communication, memory and thinking, and social role function. Higher scores means less impaired. Lower score is more impaired.
at 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Pennsylvania

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michelle J Johnson, PhD, University of Pennsylvania

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 826195

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings