The Effects of Wild Blueberries on Depressive Symptoms in Young Adults (BluMood)

April 20, 2022 updated by: Prof Claire Williams, University of Reading

The Effects of Wild Blueberries on Depressive Symptoms in Young Adults: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

This study aims to investigate the effects of a 6-week dietary intervention of 22 g freeze-dried whole wild blueberry powder. The outcomes include measures of depression, anxiety, anhedonia, cognitive function, and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design study assessing the effects of a 6-week intervention of wild blueberry powder in young adults with depressive symptoms. A total of 60 participants will be randomly assigned to either 22 g blueberry powder or a matched placebo powder consumed daily with water. The severity of depression, anxiety, anhedonia, perceived stress, and quality of life will be measured at baseline and 6 weeks later. In addition, we will assess changes in cognitive function and transient mood 2 hours after consuming a single dose of blueberries.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Berkshire
      • Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom, RG6 6AL
        • Recruiting
        • School of Psychology and Clinical Languages, University of Reading
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Carien van Reekum, Professor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 24 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 24 years of age
  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥ 10 and a score ≥ 2 on the sum of items 1 and 2
  • Willingness to provide blood samples

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any medically significant condition (e.g. diabetes, endocrine or gastrointestinal disorders)
  • Taking medication (excluding hormonal contraception)
  • History of mental illness (excluding anxiety and unipolar depressive disorders)
  • Allergy to blueberries or any other Vaccinium species
  • Receiving psychotherapy or counselling

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Blueberry powder
Dietary supplement: Wild blueberry powder
22 g freeze-dried wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) powder consumed daily with 250 ml water. The powder is sealed in sachets and stored at -24 °C, except when transported. Participants are asked to store the sachets in a freezer until consumption.
Experimental: Placebo powder
Dietary supplement: Placebo powder
22 g placebo powder matched for macronutrients, color, and flavor consumed daily with 250 ml water. The powder is sealed in sachets and participants are asked to store the sachets in a freezer until consumption.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A validated 21-item self-rated scale for assessing depression severity. The scale ranges from 0 to 63 points with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptomatology.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A self-rated scale of depressive symptoms. The scale ranges from 0 to 27 points with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
6 weeks
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A brief self-rated scale of generalized anxiety. The scale ranges from 0 to 21 points with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.
6 weeks
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) - modified version
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A 14-item self-rated scale for measuring anhedonia. Each item has been modified to have five possible responses, which are scored as follows: "strongly disagree" (4 points), "somewhat disagree" (3 points), "neither agree nor disagree" (2 points), "somewhat agree" (1 point), "strongly agree" (0 points). Thus, the scale will range from 0 to 56 points with higher scores indicating greater levels of anhedonia.
6 weeks
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A validated 10-item questionnaire to measure levels of perceived stress. The scale ranges from 0 to 40 points with higher scores indicating greater stress levels.
6 weeks
Composite Quality of Life Index
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A 44-item composite index of quality of life derived by adding 11 facets of the WHOQOL-100 Questionnaire (General Health and Life Satisfaction, Pain and Discomfort, Energy and Fatigue, Sleep and Rest, Positive Feelings, Cognitive Function, Self-esteem, Negative Feelings, Activities of Daily Living, Work Capacity, and Personal Relationships). The scale ranges from 0 to 176 points with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
6 weeks
Positive affect as measured by PANAS-X
Time Frame: 2 hours post-ingestion
Positive affect will be calculated by adding the values of the 21 positive items of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-X and the additional item "motivated". Thus, the scale will range from 0 to 88 points with higher scores indicating better mood.
2 hours post-ingestion
Positive affect as measured by PANAS-X
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Positive affect will be calculated by adding the values of the 21 positive items of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-X and the additional item "motivated". Thus, the scale will range from 0 to 88 points with higher scores indicating better mood.
6 weeks
Negative affect as measured by PANAS-X
Time Frame: 2 hours post-ingestion
Negative affect will be calculated by adding the values of the 25 negative items of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-X. Thus, the scale will range from 0 to 100 points with higher scores indicating worse mood.
2 hours post-ingestion
Negative affect as measured by PANAS-X
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Negative affect will be calculated by adding the values of the 25 negative items of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-X. Thus, the scale will range from 0 to 100 points with higher scores indicating worse mood.
6 weeks
Cognitive flexibility
Time Frame: 2 hours post-ingestion
A task-switching test will be used to assess cognitive flexibility when switching between two predictable tasks requiring simple numerical decisions. The main outcome of interest is the average accuracy (0 to 100%).
2 hours post-ingestion
Cognitive flexibility
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A task-switching test will be used to assess cognitive flexibility when switching between two predictable tasks requiring simple numerical decisions. The main outcome of interest is the average accuracy (0 to 100%).
6 weeks
Brain-derived neutrophic factor (BDNF) in serum
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Serum levels of BDNF will be analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
6 weeks
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) in serum
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Serum levels of IL-6 will be analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as a marker of systemic inflammation.
6 weeks
C-reactive protein (CRP) in serum
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Serum levels of CRP will be measured using an automated chemistry analyzer as a marker of systemic inflammation.
6 weeks
Uric acid in serum
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Serum levels of uric acid will be measured using an automated chemistry analyzer.
6 weeks
Serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of serum will be measured to assess systemic antioxidant status.
6 weeks
Serum superoxide dismutase (SOD)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Serum levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) will be measured as an indicator of oxidative stress.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Reading

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Wild Blueberry Association of North America (WBANA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Claire Williams, Professor, University of Reading

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 6, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 20, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 20, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20/13

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Anonymized data may be made available on a platform such as Open Science Framework (www.osf.io) or a data repository linked to academic journals, in accordance with Open Science principles.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings