Registry of Patients With Von WilLEbrand Disease Treated With Voncento® (OPALE)

April 18, 2024 updated by: CSL Behring

Observational Registry of Patients With Von WilLEbrand Disease Treated With Voncento®

Description of the long-term evolution of patients with von Willebrand disease and treated with Voncento® and of the hemostatic efficacy in the prevention and the treatment of non-surgical bleeding episodes and prevention of surgical bleeding during 2 years after patient inclusion.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Inherited von Willebrand disease (VWD) is considered the most common bleeding disorder. Its prevalence is approximately 1% in the general population but symptomatic patients are rarer (0.01%). It is caused by a partial or total quantitative deficiency (type 1 and type 3) or by a qualitative defect (type 2) of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a large multimeric protein that is required for platelet adhesion and serves as factor VIII (FVIII) carrier. Type 2 VWD is further divided in four subgroups (2A, 2B, 2M, and 2N) that are distinguished according to the nature of the VWF defect. Most patients with type 1 VWD can be treated with the synthetic vasopressin analogue desmopressin (DDAVP; 2-desamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin), whereas patients with type 3 VWD and most patients with type 2 VWD require concentrates containing VWF. Plasma-derived FVIII concentrates, which were initially developed for the treatment of haemophilia, contain large amounts of VWF and are used in patients for whom DDAVP treatment is deemed ineffective or contraindicated. Voncento® (CSL Behring) is a plasma-derived FVIII/VWF concentrate registered in France since 2015 for the treatment and prevention of bleeding events in patients with inherited VWD. OPALE is an observational study describing the use of human coagulation FVIII/VWF concentrate (Voncento®) to treat and prevent bleeding episodes in a French cohort of patients with inherited von Willebrand disease in the real life settings. The aim of the OPALE study is to describe the efficacy and the safety of Voncento® in the prophylaxis and treatment of haemorrhage or surgical bleeding.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
135

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Besançon, France
        • CHU Besançon
      • Bordeaux, France
        • CHU Bordeaux
      • Brest, France
        • CHU Morvan Brest
      • Bron, France
        • CHU Lyon
      • Caen, France
        • CHU Caen
      • Eaubonne, France
        • Hôpital Simone Veil
      • Le Chesnay, France
        • Hopital Mignot
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
        • Hôpital Bicêtre
      • Montpellier, France
        • Hopital Saint-Eloi
      • Nancy, France
        • CHRU Nancy
      • Nantes, France
        • CHU Nantes
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Cochin
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Necker
      • Paris, France
        • Chu Lariboisiere
      • Rennes, France
        • CHU Rennes
      • Rouen, France
        • CHU Rouen
      • Strasbourg, France
        • CHU Strasbourg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

French cohort of patients with inherited von Willebrand disease treated with Voncento.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering from constitutional von Willebrand disease for whom Desmopressin treatment is deemed ineffective or contraindicated
  • Patients suffering from von Willebrand disease and being treated or having been treated with Voncento® for the treatment of surgical and non-surgical bleeding episodes, the prophylaxis of surgical and non-surgical bleedings
  • Patients with no history or suspicion of inhibitors (judged on previous efficacy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of the patient or the patient's legal representative to take part in the study;
  • Existence of a contraindication to the use of Voncento® treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Global assessment by the patient and the investigator of the hemostatic efficacy of Voncento® in the management of non-surgical bleeding episodes
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Up to 24 months
Number of non-surgical bleeding episodes per year
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Up to 24 months
Number of administrations of Voncento® needed to treat a non-surgical bleeding episode and for the long term prophylaxis
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Up to 24 months
Total dose of Voncento® (in IU/kg of VWF) needed to treat a non-surgical bleeding episode and for the long term prophylaxis
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Up to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assessment by the investigator of the hemostatic efficacy of Voncento® during the treatment and the prophylaxis of surgical bleedings and after surgical procedures
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Up to 24 months
Number of administrations of Voncento® needed to prevent or treat surgical bleeding episode
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Up to 24 months
Total dose of Voncento® (in IU/kg of VWF) needed to prevent or treat surgical bleeding episode
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Up to 24 months
Nature and impact of adverse events and in particular serious adverse events, adverse events related to Voncento®
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Up to 24 months
Collection of available biological data (ex: FVIII, VWF:Rco, VWF:Ag)
Time Frame: At baseline and up to 24 months
At baseline and up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
CSL Behring

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Study Director, CSL Behring SA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 23, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 7, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 18, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OPALE study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings