Memory and Attention Adaptation Training-Geriatrics (MAAT-G) Phase II

June 25, 2025 updated by: Allison Magnuson, University of Rochester

Mitigating Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy: Memory and Attention Adaptation Training-Geriatrics (MAAT-G): A Randomized Pilot Study

Cancer-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) affects up to 75% of patients receiving chemotherapy and older adults are at greater risk of developing CRCD, which can negatively affect their functional independence and quality of life. Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT) is a promising treatment for CRCD that improves perceived cognition in younger cancer survivors, but needs to be adapted for older adults to address their unique needs. The proposed study will adapt MAAT for older adults using feedback from key stakeholders (older adults with cancer and their caregivers), and subsequently test the ability of MAAT to improve or maintain cognition for older adults with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cancer-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) is a significant problem, affecting up to 75% of patients receiving chemotherapy. Older adults are at greater risk of developing CRCD which can negatively affect their functional independence and quality of life. Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT) is a promising tool that improves perceived cognition in younger cancer survivors with CRCD. For older adults with cancer, MAAT could be delivered alongside chemotherapy to mitigate the development of CRCD (when risk is highest) and CRCD-related effects on functional independence for older adults. However, MAAT will require adaptation to meet the unique needs of older adults to optimize usability and efficacy for this population. The overarching goal of this project is to adapt MAAT for older adults using input from patient and caregiver stakeholders, and subsequently gather data on the preliminary effects of the adapted MAAT (MAAT-Geriatrics [G]) on perceived cognition, objective cognitive measures and functional independence. The investigators will adapt and refine MAAT-G using feedback from key stakeholders through iterative testing of MAAT-G with 85 patient-caregiver dyads. The research plan combines the use of standardized quantitative measures of cognition and functional independence with semi-structured interviews (mixed methods), so that data from both can be integrated to optimize the adaptation and to gain a better understanding of MAAT-G's effects that are not fully captured by traditional quantitative measures alone.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
72

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14623
        • University of Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer
  • Planned to receive systemic therapy for breast cancer or actively receiving systemic therapy for breast cancer with two additional cycles remaining.
  • Be age 65 or older
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Able to read and understand English (or possess a designated health care proxy that can do the same that was designated prior to the patient losing decision-making capabilities)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have surgery planned within 3 months of consent
  • Patients who do not have decision-making capacity (decisionally or cognitively impaired) AND do NOT have a previously designated health care proxy (established prior to their cognitive impairment) available to sign consent
  • Patients with breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy as their only systemic therapy will not be eligible.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Supportive therapy (time and attention control)
Supportive Therapy (ST) is a "behavioral placebo" and controls for non-specific psychotherapeutic factors of the clinician-subject relationship, such as empathy and support, but does not provide active cognitive training. ST utilizes reflective listening to help deepen awareness of participants' emotional experience. Timing and duration of ST sessions will mirror the intervention, and will consist of 10 weekly sessions, 30 to 45 minutes each, delivered by trained psychologists via video-conferencing.
Behavioral: Supportive therapy (time and attention control)
Supportive Therapy (ST) is a "behavioral placebo" and controls for non-specific psychotherapeutic factors of the clinician-subject relationship, such as empathy and support, but does not provide active cognitive training. ST utilizes reflective listening to help deepen awareness of participants' emotional experience. Timing and duration of ST sessions will mirror the intervention, and will consist of 10 weekly sessions, 30 to 45 minutes each, delivered by trained psychologists via video-conferencing.
Experimental: MAAT-G intervention
The MAAT-G intervention will be delivered by a trained psychology fellow at the University of Rochester Medical Center. The intervention will be delivered through televideoconferencing and participants will be provided a tablet equipped with a HIPPA compliant televideoconferencing application to use for the MAAT-G workshop sessions. We will use the University of Rochester Zoom application which is HIPPA compliant. A tablet instruction manual will be given to patients to help guide them through how to use a tablet and how to navigate the Zoom application. A unique meeting ID number will be given to each patient to log in to the Zoom application. If participants do not have access to wireless internet, the tablet will be equipped with a data package for participant use for the purposes of this study
Behavioral: MAAT-G
Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT) is a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)-based intervention for CRCD. As a CBT-based intervention, MAAT focuses on an individual's psychological response to injury as compared to the biological events triggering CRCD. MAAT is a series of manualized workshops delivered by a psychologist via video-conferencing, supplemented by a participant workbook, which provide instruction and practice with adaptive behavioral coping skills, stress management techniques, and compensation strategies.
No Intervention: Caregivers
Patients on this study had the option to enroll a caregiver.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognition (FACT-COG)
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognition tool is a 50-question tool that evaluates memory and mental function in the past 7 days. The range of scores for the tool are 0 to 200 with higher scores generally indicating worse health outcomes.
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Least Squares Mean for Delay Match to Sample Total Correct at the 12-second Delay (DMSTC-12) From the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The CANTAB Delayed Matching to Sample assesses both simultaneous visual matching ability and short-term visual recognition memory for non-verbalizable patterns. The subject is shown a complex visual pattern, followed by four similar patterns after a brief delay. The subject must select the pattern that exactly matches the sample. Better speed of response and a higher number of correct patterns indicate better health outcomes. (Patients only) The least squares mean for the variable Delay Match to Sample Total Correct at the 12-second delay (DMSTC-12) is analyzed.
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Mean of the Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) Tool
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) tool is a measure of verbal fluency evaluating expressive language and executive function. Subjects are asked to freely generate as many words as they can that start with one of the prompted letters ("C", "F", and "L") in the span of one minute. Greater numbers of words indicate better health outcomes. (Patients only)
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Mean of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R)
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) tool is a test of verbal learning and memory. Researchers read a list of 12 words to subjects and ask them to report as many of the words as they can recall. The reporting period is timed. Higher numbers of correctly remembered words, along with lower reporting times, are indicative of better health outcomes. (Patients only)
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Mean of the Geriatric Depression Screen (GDS)
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The Geriatric Depression Screen (GDS) tool is a 15 question psychological assessment with "yes" or "no" answers (ranging from 0 to 15, with a higher score indicating more depression). The questions pertain to emotional state and vary between positive and negative presentation. (Patients only)
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Mean of the Generalized Anxiety and Depression 7-item Scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The Generalized Anxiety and Depression 7-item scale (GAD-7) is a 7-item question tool that evaluates feelings of anxiety over the previous 2 weeks. Each question is ranked from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating worse health outcomes (the range for the survey is 0-21). (Patients only)
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Mean of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) tool asks questions about functional independence. There are 7 questions on scale of most to least independence. The range of this scale is 3 to 21, with a higher score indicating less independence. (Patients only)
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Experience Interview - Proportion of Patients Who Expressed Perceived Benefit From Workshops.
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Semi-structured interview with patients about experience with workshop sessions - proportion of patients who expressed perceived benefit from workshops.
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Rochester

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Allison Magnuson, DO, University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UCCS20127
  • K76AG064394 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings