Memory and Attention Adaptation Training-Geriatrics (MAAT-G) Phase II

June 25, 2025 updated by: Allison Magnuson, University of Rochester

Mitigating Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy: Memory and Attention Adaptation Training-Geriatrics (MAAT-G): A Randomized Pilot Study

Cancer-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) affects up to 75% of patients receiving chemotherapy and older adults are at greater risk of developing CRCD, which can negatively affect their functional independence and quality of life. Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT) is a promising treatment for CRCD that improves perceived cognition in younger cancer survivors, but needs to be adapted for older adults to address their unique needs. The proposed study will adapt MAAT for older adults using feedback from key stakeholders (older adults with cancer and their caregivers), and subsequently test the ability of MAAT to improve or maintain cognition for older adults with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cancer-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) is a significant problem, affecting up to 75% of patients receiving chemotherapy. Older adults are at greater risk of developing CRCD which can negatively affect their functional independence and quality of life. Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT) is a promising tool that improves perceived cognition in younger cancer survivors with CRCD. For older adults with cancer, MAAT could be delivered alongside chemotherapy to mitigate the development of CRCD (when risk is highest) and CRCD-related effects on functional independence for older adults. However, MAAT will require adaptation to meet the unique needs of older adults to optimize usability and efficacy for this population. The overarching goal of this project is to adapt MAAT for older adults using input from patient and caregiver stakeholders, and subsequently gather data on the preliminary effects of the adapted MAAT (MAAT-Geriatrics [G]) on perceived cognition, objective cognitive measures and functional independence. The investigators will adapt and refine MAAT-G using feedback from key stakeholders through iterative testing of MAAT-G with 85 patient-caregiver dyads. The research plan combines the use of standardized quantitative measures of cognition and functional independence with semi-structured interviews (mixed methods), so that data from both can be integrated to optimize the adaptation and to gain a better understanding of MAAT-G's effects that are not fully captured by traditional quantitative measures alone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14623
        • University of Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer
  • Planned to receive systemic therapy for breast cancer or actively receiving systemic therapy for breast cancer with two additional cycles remaining.
  • Be age 65 or older
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Able to read and understand English (or possess a designated health care proxy that can do the same that was designated prior to the patient losing decision-making capabilities)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have surgery planned within 3 months of consent
  • Patients who do not have decision-making capacity (decisionally or cognitively impaired) AND do NOT have a previously designated health care proxy (established prior to their cognitive impairment) available to sign consent
  • Patients with breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy as their only systemic therapy will not be eligible.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Supportive therapy (time and attention control)
Supportive Therapy (ST) is a "behavioral placebo" and controls for non-specific psychotherapeutic factors of the clinician-subject relationship, such as empathy and support, but does not provide active cognitive training. ST utilizes reflective listening to help deepen awareness of participants' emotional experience. Timing and duration of ST sessions will mirror the intervention, and will consist of 10 weekly sessions, 30 to 45 minutes each, delivered by trained psychologists via video-conferencing.
Supportive Therapy (ST) is a "behavioral placebo" and controls for non-specific psychotherapeutic factors of the clinician-subject relationship, such as empathy and support, but does not provide active cognitive training. ST utilizes reflective listening to help deepen awareness of participants' emotional experience. Timing and duration of ST sessions will mirror the intervention, and will consist of 10 weekly sessions, 30 to 45 minutes each, delivered by trained psychologists via video-conferencing.
Experimental: MAAT-G intervention
The MAAT-G intervention will be delivered by a trained psychology fellow at the University of Rochester Medical Center. The intervention will be delivered through televideoconferencing and participants will be provided a tablet equipped with a HIPPA compliant televideoconferencing application to use for the MAAT-G workshop sessions. We will use the University of Rochester Zoom application which is HIPPA compliant. A tablet instruction manual will be given to patients to help guide them through how to use a tablet and how to navigate the Zoom application. A unique meeting ID number will be given to each patient to log in to the Zoom application. If participants do not have access to wireless internet, the tablet will be equipped with a data package for participant use for the purposes of this study
Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT) is a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)-based intervention for CRCD. As a CBT-based intervention, MAAT focuses on an individual's psychological response to injury as compared to the biological events triggering CRCD. MAAT is a series of manualized workshops delivered by a psychologist via video-conferencing, supplemented by a participant workbook, which provide instruction and practice with adaptive behavioral coping skills, stress management techniques, and compensation strategies.
No Intervention: Caregivers
Patients on this study had the option to enroll a caregiver.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognition (FACT-COG)
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognition tool is a 50-question tool that evaluates memory and mental function in the past 7 days. The range of scores for the tool are 0 to 200 with higher scores generally indicating worse health outcomes.
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Least Squares Mean for Delay Match to Sample Total Correct at the 12-second Delay (DMSTC-12) From the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The CANTAB Delayed Matching to Sample assesses both simultaneous visual matching ability and short-term visual recognition memory for non-verbalizable patterns. The subject is shown a complex visual pattern, followed by four similar patterns after a brief delay. The subject must select the pattern that exactly matches the sample. Better speed of response and a higher number of correct patterns indicate better health outcomes. (Patients only) The least squares mean for the variable Delay Match to Sample Total Correct at the 12-second delay (DMSTC-12) is analyzed.
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Mean of the Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) Tool
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) tool is a measure of verbal fluency evaluating expressive language and executive function. Subjects are asked to freely generate as many words as they can that start with one of the prompted letters ("C", "F", and "L") in the span of one minute. Greater numbers of words indicate better health outcomes. (Patients only)
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Mean of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R)
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) tool is a test of verbal learning and memory. Researchers read a list of 12 words to subjects and ask them to report as many of the words as they can recall. The reporting period is timed. Higher numbers of correctly remembered words, along with lower reporting times, are indicative of better health outcomes. (Patients only)
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Mean of the Geriatric Depression Screen (GDS)
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The Geriatric Depression Screen (GDS) tool is a 15 question psychological assessment with "yes" or "no" answers (ranging from 0 to 15, with a higher score indicating more depression). The questions pertain to emotional state and vary between positive and negative presentation. (Patients only)
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Mean of the Generalized Anxiety and Depression 7-item Scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The Generalized Anxiety and Depression 7-item scale (GAD-7) is a 7-item question tool that evaluates feelings of anxiety over the previous 2 weeks. Each question is ranked from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating worse health outcomes (the range for the survey is 0-21). (Patients only)
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Mean of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
The Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) tool asks questions about functional independence. There are 7 questions on scale of most to least independence. The range of this scale is 3 to 21, with a higher score indicating less independence. (Patients only)
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Experience Interview - Proportion of Patients Who Expressed Perceived Benefit From Workshops.
Time Frame: Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).
Semi-structured interview with patients about experience with workshop sessions - proportion of patients who expressed perceived benefit from workshops.
Within four weeks of intervention completion, the intervention window was 10 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks (8 to 12 weeks).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Allison Magnuson, DO, University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UCCS20127
  • K76AG064394 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on Supportive therapy (time and attention control)

Subscribe