Golden Walk as Measure of Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease

January 17, 2021 updated by: Antonella Peppe, I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia

Golden Walk- A Wearable Technology Assessment and Biofeedback for Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease Patients

Gait is specifically impaired in Parkinson's disease (PD). External auditory cue based on a binary rhythm tested in PD patients disappear when the stimulus is removed. Golden Ratio (GR)is intrinsic in the human gait, but in PD patients this GR has been found impaired. Aim of the study is the administration of an auditory external cue based on a personalized Golden Ratio-rhythm which could potentially assist people with PD to cope with the difficulties that they experience while walking, thus increasing their mobility and autonomy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Gait is specifically impaired in Parkinson's disease (PD). External auditory cue based on a binary rhythm has been successfully used in people with PD to improve their gait quality, but the beneficial effects disappear when the stimulus is removed. Recent evidences have shown that, in healthy subjects, the structure of walking relies on a number, called Golden Ratio (GR), based on a perfect proportion between different gait phases. While GR is known to be impaired in people with PD, there are few evidences that a GR-based auditory stimulus could support people with PD in counteracting gait alterations. As hypothesis, an auditory external cue based on a personalized GR-rhythm could assist people with PD to cope with the difficulties that they experience while walking, thus increasing their mobility and autonomy, and that the nature of this GR-rhythm allows to maintain the beneficial effects in time. Two personalized auditory rhythms (a binary rhythm and a GR-rhythm) will be alternatively administered to each participant (see diagram below). Patient-specific rhythms will administered by a user-friendly ad-hoc app for smartphone. Two assessments will be performed during these 24 weeks, to assess treatment efficacy. At the end of the 24th week, half of patients will continue with the GR-rhythm and, in a final assessment, we will see if the effect lasts over time.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Lazio
      • Rome, Lazio, Italy, 00179
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Santa Lucia
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Antonella Peppe, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marco Iosa, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Giuseppe Vannozzi, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Valeria Belluscio, Ms

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of idiopathic PD, as proposed by the Brain Bank Criteria for PD, since at least 5 years
  • suffered from a rigid akinetic form of bilateral Parkinson's Disease (Hoehn and Yahr: 2-3), according to current criteria
  • to be on stable treatment regimen for at least the 3 months before the recruitment
  • Mini Mental State Examination score >24
  • Do not vary the pharmacological treatment during the entire duration of the study
  • Be tested in "ON" medication state

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to stand or walk without aids or supports
  • factors affecting gait such as hip replacement, musculoskeletal disorders, uncorrected vision or vestibular problems;
  • inability to follow instructions;
  • severe dysautonomia with marked hypotension, major depression, dementia, pregnancy, or cardiac pacemaker

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Patients with Golden Rhythm
Administration of an external auditory cue based on Golden Rhythm
Other: Stimulation with external auditory bio-feedback
Administration of an external cue based on a personalized Golden Ratio -rhythm or a metronome-rhythm through an ad-hoc App for Smartphone
Placebo Comparator: Patients with Metronome
Administration of an external auditory cue based on metronome binary rhythm
Other: Stimulation with external auditory bio-feedback
Administration of an external cue based on a personalized Golden Ratio -rhythm or a metronome-rhythm through an ad-hoc App for Smartphone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of Golden Ratio-rhythm on Gait walking speed
Time Frame: 18 months
Changes in walking speed between baseline and end of the study
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of Golden Ratio-rhythm on stride lenght
Time Frame: 18 months
Changes in stride length between baseline and end of the study and between more and less affected side
18 months
Efficacy of Golden Ratio-rhythm on toe clearance
Time Frame: 18 months
Changes in toe clearance between baseline and end of the study and between more and less affected side
18 months
Efficacy of Golden Ratio-rhythm on hMaxMalleoli
Time Frame: 18 months
Changes in maximum Malleoli heigth between baseline and end of the study and between more and less affected side
18 months
Efficacy of Golden Ratio-rhythm on stride to stance ratio
Time Frame: 18 months
Changes in stride to stance ratio between baseline and end of the study and between more and less affected side
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Roma La Sapienza
Università degli studi di Roma Foro Italico

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Antonella Peppe, Fondazione Santa Lucia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 17, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HSantaLucia

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings