Defining the Potency of DTG/3TC for Suppressed HIV Patients in Real-life: the DUALING Study (DUALING)
Defining the Potency of DTG/3TC for Suppressed HIV Patients in Real-life: the DUALING Study.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Arnhem, Netherlands
- Rijnstate Hospital
-
Eindhoven, Netherlands
- Catharina Ziekenhuis
-
Enschede, Netherlands
- Medisch Spectrum Twente
-
Goes, Netherlands
- Admiraal de Ruyter Ziekenhuis
-
Haarlem, Netherlands
- Spaarne Gasthuis
-
Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Maasstad Hospital
-
Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 CN
- Erasmus MC
-
Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 CN
- MC Haaglanden
-
Tilburg, Netherlands
- Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Plasma HIVRNA <50c/mL on triple drug cART regimen including 2NRTI In care in a HIV treatment center in the Netherlands Consented to ATHENA participation
Exclusion Criteria:
Documented mutations associated with 3TC or DTG resistance of at least low level Documented inadherence by the treating physician or HepB coinfection (cases only)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
DTG based switchers to DTG/3TC
HIVRNA suppressed HIV patients who switched to DTG/3TC
|
|
|
DTG based triple drug cART
Matched HIVRNA suppressed patients who remained on triple drug DTG based cART
|
|
|
non-DTG based switchers to DTG/3TC
|
HIVRNA suppressed patients without documented M184V mutation in HIV RT and who are hepatitis B immune or have no risk factors for acquiring hepatitis B
|
|
non-DTG based triple drug cART
Matched HIVRNA suppressed patients who remained on triple drug non-DTG based cART
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy On Treatment (OT)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Proportion of subjects with treatment failure in the DTG/3TC versus 3-drug DTG containing cART group up to 1 year of follow up in the on treatment population
|
1 year
|
|
Efficacy Intention to Treat (ITT)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Proportion of subjects with treatment failure in the DTG/3TC versus 3-drug DTG containing cART group up to 1 year of follow up in the intention to treat population.
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Long term efficacy
Time Frame: 5 year
|
Proportion of subjects with treatment failure in the DTG/3TC versus 3-drug DTG containing cART group after 2 and 5 year of follow up in the OT and ITT population.
|
5 year
|
|
Long term efficacy subgroups
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Proportion of subjects with treatment failure in the DTG/3TC versus 3-drug cART overall, and according to INSTI/PI/NNRTI (non-DTG) subgroups, after 1, 2 and 5 year of follow up in the OT and ITT population.
|
5 years
|
|
Time to event analysis
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Time to treatment failure in the DTG/3TC versus 3-drug DTG containing cART group and 3drug cART overall (including according to INSTI/PI/NNRTI (non-DTG) subgroups) according to the ITT and the OT population during 1, 2 and 5 years of follow up.
|
5 years
|
|
Plasma viral load
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Proportion of plasma viral load measurements above the limit of detection of the PCR but <50 (between 20 and 50 c/mL), proportion of viral blips of HIVRNA >50 once with plasma HIVRNA measured <=50 c/mL before and after, proportion of plasma HIVRNA >200 and >1000c/mL on DTG/3TC versus 3-drug DTG containing cART group and 3drug cART overall and according to INSTI/PI/NNRTI (non-DTG) subgroups.
|
5 years
|
|
Drug associated resistance
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Proportion of patients with emergent mutations associated with resistance to DTG, 3TC or the third antiviral agent in cases versus controls.
|
5 years
|
|
Treatment failure predictors
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Predictor variables for treatment failure in the DTG/3TC, 3-drug (non) DTG containing cART group and 3drug cART overall at the 1, 2, and 5 years of follow up in the OT and ITT population according to 1) sex, 2) ethnicity (Caucasian, African, other), 3) CD4+Tcell nadir, 4) HIVRNA zenith, duration of suppressive cART (</>1year and </>5 year), 5) presence of mutations, 6) CD4/CD8 ratio nadir 7) documented history in ATHENA database of virological failure (without selection of M184VI or major DTG related RAMs) or inadherence.
|
5 years
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Interim analysis
Time Frame: 3 and 4 years
|
Analysis of endpoints at 3 and 4 years of follow up
|
3 and 4 years
|
|
Side effects
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Proportion of subjects with switches due to side effects in the DTG/3TC versus 3-drug (non) DTG containing cART group and 3drug cART overall after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years of follow up
|
5 years
|
|
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the switch from triple cART to DTG/3TC.
|
5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DUALING
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.