Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Levels in Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) During Anti-VEGF Treatment

February 20, 2025 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Correlation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels in Anterior Chamber Fluid to Disease State in Patients With Retinal Vein Occlusion Receiving Standard of Care Treatment

The purpose of this study is to treat patients with retinal vein occlusion with standard of care anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy and to correlate levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in the anterior chamber fluid of the eye. This study will evaluate if measuring the vascular endothelial growth factor will help predict the timing of when anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy will be needed.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Ten patients, 5 with branch retinal vein occlusion and 5 with central retinal vein occlusion, will receive stand of care anti-vascular endothelial growth factor over the course of 52 weeks while undergoing a paracentesis prior to each treatment. During the paracentesis anterior chamber fluid will be removed to evaluate vascular endothelial growth factor levels along with other cytokines present in the anterior chamber fluid. Ocular coherence tomography will also be collected at each visit to evaluate macular thickness which will be used to help determine treatment windows along with levels of vascular endothelial growth factor. Patients with high levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and the presence of macular edema on ocular coherence tomography will be treated every four weeks. Once vascular endothelial growth factor levels are reduced along with improvements of macula edema treatment windows will be extended to 8 weeks and then to 12 weeks once levels are normal and edema is no longer present.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
17

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent.
  • Diagnosis of Retinal Vein Occlusion with macular edema and central foveal thickness of greater than or equal to 300 microns confirmed by intravenous fluorescein angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography
  • Visual Acuity between 20/25 and 5/200

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral Retinal Vein Occlusion
  • Vision worse than 5/200 in study eye
  • History of myocardial infarction, ischemia, or cerebrovascular accident within 6 weeks of screening
  • Concurrent Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and/or Maculopathy
  • Concurrent Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration
  • Concurrent optic neuropathy with the presence of an afferent pupillary defect
  • Previous vitrectomy in the study eye
  • Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the duration of the study. Women currently breastfeeding are also excluded.
  • Previous treatment for retinal vein occlusion in the study eye
  • Any current medical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator is considered to be uncontrolled
  • History of allergy or hypersensitivity to study treatment, fluorescein, or any study procedure and treatment related ingredients (e.g. topical anesthetics, betadine, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Aflibercept
All subjects will receive aflibercept every 4 weeks. Once vascular endothelial growth factor levels become normal and macular edema improves treatment windows will be extended up to every 12 weeks.
Drug: Aflibercept Ophthalmic
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intraocular injection
Other Names:
  • Eylea

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Macular Edema
Time Frame: Baseline through week 35
Measured by central retinal thickness using optical coherence tomography - OCT is an imaging method used to generate a picture of the back of the eye, called the retina. The picture is made by precisely measuring the amount of a dim red light that reflects off the retina
Baseline through week 35
Change in Macular Volume
Time Frame: Baseline through week 35
Measured by central retinal thickness using optical coherence tomography - OCT is an imaging method used to generate a picture of the back of the eye, called the retina. The picture is made by precisely measuring the amount of a dim red light that reflects off the retina
Baseline through week 35
Change in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Level in Anterior Chamber
Time Frame: Baseline through week 35
Evaluated by Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA) analysis
Baseline through week 35

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Time Frame: Baseline through week 52
Evaluated by tonometry - Tonometry is the procedure eye care professionals perform to determine the intraocular pressure (IOP), the fluid pressure inside the eye - Most tonometers are calibrated to measure pressure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Baseline through week 52
Number of Intravitreal Injections
Time Frame: Baseline through week 52
Number of injections received during study participation
Baseline through week 52
Change in Analytes - Interferons
Time Frame: Baseline through week 52
Interferon (IFN)-alpha 2/IFNA2, Interferon (IFN)-beta, and Interferon (IFN)-gamma - Analyzed using an ELISA multiplex
Baseline through week 52
Change in Analytes - Interleukins
Time Frame: Baseline through week 52

IL-1 alpha/IL-1F1

  • IL-1 beta/IL-1F2
  • IL-1ra/IL-1F3
  • IL-2
  • IL-3
  • IL-4
  • IL-5
  • IL-6
  • IL-7
  • IL-8/CXCL8
  • IL-10
  • IL-12 p70
  • IL-13
  • IL-15
  • IL-17/IL-17A
  • IL-17E/IL-25
  • IL-33 Analyzed using an ELISA multiplex
Baseline through week 52
Change in Analytes - Proteins
Time Frame: Baseline through week 52
Programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1)/B7 homolog 1(B7-H1) Analyzed using an ELISA multiplex
Baseline through week 52
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Time Frame: Baseline through week 35
Using Snellen Visual Acuity charts - The results are based on what line the patient can read with ease - If a subject's visual acuity is so poor that the subject can't see any letters on the charts, finger counting and/or hand motions will be checked
Baseline through week 35
Change in Analytes - Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand (CCL)s
Time Frame: Baseline through week 52
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2)/(JE/MCP-1) Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and C-C motif chemokine 11(CCL11)/Eotaxin - Analyzed using an ELISA multiplex
Baseline through week 52
Change in Analytes - Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand (CXCL)s
Time Frame: Baseline through week 52
CXCL1/GRO alpha/KC/Cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant (CINC-1) and CXCL2/GRO beta/MIP-s/CINC-3 - Analyzed using an ELISA multiplex
Baseline through week 52
Change in Analytes - Growth Factors
Time Frame: Baseline through week 52
Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF basic)/FGF2/bFGF - and Transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha) - and Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA and PDGF-AB/BBA analyzed using an ELISA multiplex Analyzed
Baseline through week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Nelson, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 18, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 18, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00064405

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share IPD at this time.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings