Calcium Phosphate Versus PMMA Cement in Thoracolumbar Fractures (CaPvsPMMA)
Calcium Phosphate Versus PMMA Cement in Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Treated With Dorsal Instrumentation in Patients > 50 Years of Age Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial Design
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Gloria Hohenberger, Assist.Prof.
- Phone Number: +43 316 385 81721
- Email: gloria.hohenberger@medunigraz.at
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Marina Bergovec, Dr. Sc.
- Phone Number: +43 316 385 87436
- Email: marina.bergovec@medunigraz.at
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Written consent of the participant after being informed
- Acute trauma (surgery within three weeks following trauma)
- Thoracolumbar fractures including segments TH 6-L5
- A3/A4 fractures according to the AO Spine fracture classification
- Patient age ≥ 50 years
- Minimum follow up 1 year
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of neurological deficits at the time of surgery
- Pathological fractures (bone metastases)
- Traumatic brain injury
- Ankylosing spondylitis as a comorbidity
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: KYPHON® ActivOs™10 Bone Cement with hydroxyapatite
As a reference device KYPHON® ActivOs™10 Bone Cement with hydroxyapatite (Medtronic) for treatment of vertebral compression fractures will be used.
It is a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement containing hydroxyapatite (HA) for use in the treatment of patients with vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) who are undergoing minimally invasive surgery with KYPHON® Balloon Kyphoplasty.
This bone substitute has already been approved and is in use in the patients at the age of 50 or older.
|
Dorsal instrumentation via Longitude II (Medtronic Austria GmbH/Vienna) and balloon kyphoplasty are performed.
KYPHON ActivOs® Bone Cement with Hydroxyapatite will be introduced in the fractured vertebral body.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: KyphOs FS™
The test device KyphOs FS™ will be used in patients at the age of 50 and older in order to prove its superiority over the currently used PMMA bone cement.
|
Dorsal instrumentation via Longitude II (Medtronic Austria GmbH/Vienna) and balloon kyphoplasty are performed.
KyphOs FS™ bone cement will be introduced in the fractured vertebral body.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The change in correction rates when using CaP
Time Frame: Preoperatively (determination of fracture classification), postoperatively (immediately following surgery), 1 year postoperatively
|
The main outcome measure 1 will be the loss of correction rate that will be measured through the bi-segmental COBB angle presented in the CT-scan.
The Cobb angle will be measured between the superior end plate of the vertebral body cephalad to the injury and the inferior end plate of the vertebral body caudal to the injury.
|
Preoperatively (determination of fracture classification), postoperatively (immediately following surgery), 1 year postoperatively
|
|
The change in correction rates when using PMMA
Time Frame: Preoperatively (determination of fracture classification), postoperatively (immediately following surgery), 1 year postoperatively
|
The main outcome 2 measure will be the loss of correction rate that will be measured through the bi-segmental COBB angle presented in the CT-scan.
The Cobb angle will be measured between the superior end plate of the vertebral body cephalad to the injury and the inferior end plate of the vertebral body caudal to the injury.
Measurements will be taken from CT scans.
|
Preoperatively (determination of fracture classification), postoperatively (immediately following surgery), 1 year postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The change in vertebral body height when using CaP
Time Frame: Preoperatively, postoperatively (immediately following the surgery), 1 year postoperatively
|
The percentage loss of the vertebral body height will be calculated by dividing the height of the fractured vertebra by the average height of the cephalad and caudad vertebrae and then subtracting this number from 100%.
Measurements will be taken from CT scans.
|
Preoperatively, postoperatively (immediately following the surgery), 1 year postoperatively
|
|
The change in vertebral body height when using PMMA
Time Frame: Preoperatively, postoperatively (immediately following the surgery), 1 year postoperatively
|
The percentage loss of the vertebral body height will be calculated by dividing the height of the fractured vertebra by the average height of the cephalad and caudad vertebrae and then subtracting this number from 100%.
|
Preoperatively, postoperatively (immediately following the surgery), 1 year postoperatively
|
|
Changes in complication rates when using PMMA
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively
|
The occurence of the complication rates, in particular cement extravasation and temporary fall in blood pressure, will be compared between the two groups for each time point using the Student´s t-test for independent samples.
In addition, a paired Student´s t-test will be performed within each group in order to evaluate the differences in means of the secondary endpoints measured at the defined timepoints.
|
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Changes in complication rates when using CaP
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively
|
The occurence of the complication rates, in particular cement extravasation and temporary fall in blood pressure, will be compared between the two groups for each time point using the Student´s t-test for independent samples.
In addition, a paired Student´s t-test will be performed within each group in order to evaluate the differences in means of the secondary endpoints measured at the defined timepoints.
|
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Change in the disability on the ODI rating scale in patients with PMMA
Time Frame: Five times - after the surgery, at each study visit (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively)
|
ODI is mainly used in spine trauma patients.
A score of 0% to 20% indicates minimal disability; 21% to 40%, moderate disability; and 41% to 60% severe disability.
|
Five times - after the surgery, at each study visit (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively)
|
|
Change in the disability on the ODI rating scale in patients with CaP
Time Frame: Five times - after the surgery, at each study visit (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively)
|
ODI is mainly used in spine trauma patients.
A score of 0% to 20% indicates minimal disability; 21% to 40%, moderate disability; and 41% to 60% severe disability.
|
Five times - after the surgery, at each study visit (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively)
|
|
Change in pain on the spine VAS in patients with PMMA
Time Frame: Five times - after the surgery, at each study visit (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively)
|
VAS - Spine Visual Analogue Scale is a measurement that measures pain intensity and it is completed by patients themselves.
|
Five times - after the surgery, at each study visit (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively)
|
|
Change in pain on the spine VAS in patients with CaP
Time Frame: Five times - after the surgery, at each study visit (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively)
|
VAS - Spine Visual Analogue Scale is a measurement that measures pain intensity and it is completed by patients themselves.
|
Five times - after the surgery, at each study visit (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively)
|
|
Change in quality of life in patients with PMMA measured by the 36-item Short Form Survey
Time Frame: Five times - after the surgery, at each study visit (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively)
|
The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) will be used to assess patient´s self-reported quality of life.
|
Five times - after the surgery, at each study visit (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively)
|
|
Change in quality of life in patients with CaP measured by the 36-item Short Form Survey
Time Frame: Five times - after the surgery, at each study visit (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively)
|
The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) will be used to assess patient´s self-reported quality of life.
|
Five times - after the surgery, at each study visit (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Paul Puchwein, Assist.Prof., University Hospital Graz
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- V 2.0
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.