The TreEat Study- Can Early Introduction of Tree Nuts Prevent Tree Nut Allergy in Infants With Peanut Allergy (TreEat)

February 16, 2026 updated by: Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Can Early Introduction of Tree Nuts Prevent Tree Nut Allergy in Infants at High Risk of Tree Nut Allergy: The TreEat Study: a Randomised, Open-label Controlled Trial

Early and regular ingestion of the common allergens, peanut and egg has been shown to be an effective allergy prevention strategy. It is not clear whether this is also true of tree nut allergy. Current practice in many Australian allergy clinics for children with peanut allergy (high risk of tree nut allergy), is to advise families to introduce each individual tree nut into their child's diet via a cautious home introduction protocol without prior allergy testing (screening). The safety and effectiveness of an early and regular ingestion strategy for the prevention of tree nut allergy has not been formally evaluated and it is known that around a third of children with peanut allergy develop one or more other nut allergies. This trial is a 2-armed, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) to assess the safety and efficacy of a supervised hospital based multi-tree nut (almond, cashew, hazelnut and walnut) oral food challenge (OFC) + then home introduction of the remaining tree nuts versus standard care (home introduction of all 8 tree nuts) in infants with peanut allergy to reduce the risk of developing tree nut allergy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
212

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3052
        • Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

4 months to 11 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Infants aged greater than 4 months and less than 11 months of age diagnosed with IgE-mediated peanut allergy in conjunction with a positive SPT (≥3mm) or sIgE (specific immunoglobulin E) (>0.35 kU/L)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any history of severe food induced anaphylaxis. Defined as reaction requiring 2 doses of intramuscular (IM) adrenaline.
  • Pre-existing tree nut allergy (parent-reported).
  • Any tree nut already tolerated (ingestion on >3 occasions without reaction of around 1 teaspoon)
  • SPT or sIgE performed to any tree nuts
  • Not commenced or unable to eat solid food
  • Prescribed beta-blocker medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Home Introduction of Individual tree nuts
Current standard of care which is to advise families of infants diagnosed with peanut allergy to introduce tree nuts individually via a standardized, graded and cautious home introduction protocol. Day 1: smear of nut paste to the inside of lip; Day 2: 1/8 teaspoon; Day 3: 1/4 teaspoon; Day 4: 1/2 teaspoon; Day 5: 1 teaspoon. Repeat process with each individual tree nut.
Other: Home introduction
Cautious, graded introduction of individual tree nuts
Experimental: In hospital multi-tree nut (almond, cashew hazelnut and walnut) oral food challenge (OFC)
Infant will be booked for a 4-nut butter (Almond, Hazelnut, Walnut, and Cashew) graded and supervised OFC in the allergy clinical trials unit at the Murdoch Children's Research Institute. The nut butter contains a 1g dose of each nut protein in a total weight of 20g. Doses will be administered every 15minutes (1. Smear to inside of lip, 2.1/8 teaspoon, 3.1/4 teaspoon, 4.1/2 teaspoon, 5.1 teaspoon, 6.remainder of 20g nut butter paste) If challenge negative, infants continue home introduction of tree nuts as per written instructions provided. If challenge positive, infants will have additional SPT (for full tree nut panel) and single tree nut OFC as per protocol to determine tolerance/allergic status (and +/- home introduction recommendation) for each tree nut.
Other: Multi Nut oral food challenge
In hospital multi nut oral food challenge (almond, cashew, hazelnut, walnut)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between the two treatment arms in the proportion of participants with clinical confirmed tree nut allergy at 18 months of age
Time Frame: 18 months of age

Tree nut allergy outcomes at 18 months will be defined as:

  1. Allergic - has evidence of tree nut sensitization (SPT>=3mm) and has had a reaction consistent with IgE (immunoglobulin E) mediated food allergy OR positive formal OFC
  2. Tree nut tolerant- successfully tolerated the tree nut at home on more than 3 occasions of at least 1 teaspoon of nut per occasion OR has had a negative formal OFC.
  3. Inconclusive -has an unknown outcome as ingestion has not occurred and participant declines OFC.
18 months of age

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between the two treatment arms in the proportion of participants with ongoing peanut allergy at 18 months of age
Time Frame: 18 months of age
Peanut allergy will be defined as peanut sensitization (SPT >=3mm) AND has had a reaction consistent with IgE mediated food allergy since randomization OR positive formal OFC
18 months of age
Difference between the two treatment arms in the proportion and severity of reported adverse events (AE) related to tree nut ingestion.
Time Frame: 18 months of age
Number and severity of adverse events (AE) as assessed by standardised predetermined criteria, related to tree nut ingestion from randomization to 18 months of age collected via parent questionnaire and medical history.
18 months of age
Difference between the two treatment arms in the proportion and severity of solicited AEs related to tree nut ingestion.
Time Frame: 18 months of age
Number and severity of solicited AEs as assessed by standardized predetermined criteria, related to tree nut ingestion from randomization to 18 months of age collected via parent questionnaire and medical history.
18 months of age
Difference between the 2 treatment arms in the number of tree nuts ingested.
Time Frame: 18 months of age
Parent reported tree nut ingestion history based on questionnaire at baseline and 18 months of age. 0-8 tree nuts and the higher the number of tree nuts the better.
18 months of age
Difference between the 2 treatment arms in the frequency of tree nuts ingested.
Time Frame: 18 months of age
Parent reported tree nut ingestion history based on questionnaire at baseline and 18 months of age. Range will be never to daily with higher frequency better.
18 months of age
Difference between the two treatment arms in mean change from baseline of Quality of Life Scores using the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ-PF)- Parent Form at 18 months of age.
Time Frame: Baseline and 18 months of age
The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaires (FAQLQ) are disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires for patients with food allergy. FAQLQ-PF (Parent Form), completed by parents of children aged 0-12 years consists of 30 items over 3 domains (emotional impact, food anxiety, social and dietary restrictions). Total and domain scores are calculated by dividing the sum of completed items by the number of completed items. Questions are based on a 6 point Likert scale with higher scores indicating greater impact on quality of life
Baseline and 18 months of age
Difference between the two treatment arms in the mean change from baseline in State/Trait anxiety scores using the State/Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline and 18 months of age
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a psychological inventory based on a 4-point Likert scale and consists of 40 questions on a self-report basis. The STAI measures two types of anxiety - state anxiety, or anxiety about an event, and trait anxiety, or anxiety level as a personal characteristic. The total score ranges from 0-63 with higher scores positively correlated with higher levels of anxiety.
Baseline and 18 months of age
Difference in the number of allergy-related healthcare visits from randomization to 18 months of age between the treatment arms
Time Frame: 18 months of age
Captured per number of hospitalizations, Emergency room (ER) visits, physician office visits, and medications / number of prescriptions from randomization to 18 months of age.
18 months of age

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kirsten Perrett, MD. PhD, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 29, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 29, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 16, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 70489

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The de-identified data set collected for this analysis of the TreEat trial will be available six months after publication of the primary outcome. The study protocol may be obtained from the Murdoch Children's Research Institute. Prior to releasing any data the following are required: a data access agreement must be signed between relevant parties, the TreEat trial investigators must see and approve the analysis plan describing how the data will be analyzed, there must be an agreement around appropriate acknowledgment and any additional costs involved must be covered. Should the study investigators be unavailable, this role is delegated to the Murdoch Children's Research Institute. Data will only be shared with a recognized research institute which has approved the proposed analysis plan.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after publication of primary outcome

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Prior to releasing any data the following are required: a data access agreement must be signed between relevant parties, the TreEat trial investigators must see and approve the analysis plan describing how the data will be analyzed, there must be an agreement around appropriate acknowledgment and any additional costs involved must be covered.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings