- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04801823
The TreEat Study- Can Early Introduction of Tree Nuts Prevent Tree Nut Allergy in Infants With Peanut Allergy (TreEat)
February 16, 2026 updated by: Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Can Early Introduction of Tree Nuts Prevent Tree Nut Allergy in Infants at High Risk of Tree Nut Allergy: The TreEat Study: a Randomised, Open-label Controlled Trial
Early and regular ingestion of the common allergens, peanut and egg has been shown to be an effective allergy prevention strategy.
It is not clear whether this is also true of tree nut allergy.
Current practice in many Australian allergy clinics for children with peanut allergy (high risk of tree nut allergy), is to advise families to introduce each individual tree nut into their child's diet via a cautious home introduction protocol without prior allergy testing (screening).
The safety and effectiveness of an early and regular ingestion strategy for the prevention of tree nut allergy has not been formally evaluated and it is known that around a third of children with peanut allergy develop one or more other nut allergies.
This trial is a 2-armed, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) to assess the safety and efficacy of a supervised hospital based multi-tree nut (almond, cashew, hazelnut and walnut) oral food challenge (OFC) + then home introduction of the remaining tree nuts versus standard care (home introduction of all 8 tree nuts) in infants with peanut allergy to reduce the risk of developing tree nut allergy.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
212
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Victoria
-
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3052
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
4 months to 11 months (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Infants aged greater than 4 months and less than 11 months of age diagnosed with IgE-mediated peanut allergy in conjunction with a positive SPT (≥3mm) or sIgE (specific immunoglobulin E) (>0.35 kU/L)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any history of severe food induced anaphylaxis. Defined as reaction requiring 2 doses of intramuscular (IM) adrenaline.
- Pre-existing tree nut allergy (parent-reported).
- Any tree nut already tolerated (ingestion on >3 occasions without reaction of around 1 teaspoon)
- SPT or sIgE performed to any tree nuts
- Not commenced or unable to eat solid food
- Prescribed beta-blocker medication
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Home Introduction of Individual tree nuts
Current standard of care which is to advise families of infants diagnosed with peanut allergy to introduce tree nuts individually via a standardized, graded and cautious home introduction protocol.
Day 1: smear of nut paste to the inside of lip; Day 2: 1/8 teaspoon; Day 3: 1/4 teaspoon; Day 4: 1/2 teaspoon; Day 5: 1 teaspoon.
Repeat process with each individual tree nut.
|
Cautious, graded introduction of individual tree nuts
|
|
Experimental: In hospital multi-tree nut (almond, cashew hazelnut and walnut) oral food challenge (OFC)
Infant will be booked for a 4-nut butter (Almond, Hazelnut, Walnut, and Cashew) graded and supervised OFC in the allergy clinical trials unit at the Murdoch Children's Research Institute.
The nut butter contains a 1g dose of each nut protein in a total weight of 20g.
Doses will be administered every 15minutes (1.
Smear to inside of lip, 2.1/8 teaspoon, 3.1/4 teaspoon, 4.1/2 teaspoon, 5.1 teaspoon, 6.remainder of 20g nut butter paste) If challenge negative, infants continue home introduction of tree nuts as per written instructions provided.
If challenge positive, infants will have additional SPT (for full tree nut panel) and single tree nut OFC as per protocol to determine tolerance/allergic status (and +/- home introduction recommendation) for each tree nut.
|
In hospital multi nut oral food challenge (almond, cashew, hazelnut, walnut)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference between the two treatment arms in the proportion of participants with clinical confirmed tree nut allergy at 18 months of age
Time Frame: 18 months of age
|
Tree nut allergy outcomes at 18 months will be defined as:
|
18 months of age
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference between the two treatment arms in the proportion of participants with ongoing peanut allergy at 18 months of age
Time Frame: 18 months of age
|
Peanut allergy will be defined as peanut sensitization (SPT >=3mm) AND has had a reaction consistent with IgE mediated food allergy since randomization OR positive formal OFC
|
18 months of age
|
|
Difference between the two treatment arms in the proportion and severity of reported adverse events (AE) related to tree nut ingestion.
Time Frame: 18 months of age
|
Number and severity of adverse events (AE) as assessed by standardised predetermined criteria, related to tree nut ingestion from randomization to 18 months of age collected via parent questionnaire and medical history.
|
18 months of age
|
|
Difference between the two treatment arms in the proportion and severity of solicited AEs related to tree nut ingestion.
Time Frame: 18 months of age
|
Number and severity of solicited AEs as assessed by standardized predetermined criteria, related to tree nut ingestion from randomization to 18 months of age collected via parent questionnaire and medical history.
|
18 months of age
|
|
Difference between the 2 treatment arms in the number of tree nuts ingested.
Time Frame: 18 months of age
|
Parent reported tree nut ingestion history based on questionnaire at baseline and 18 months of age.
0-8 tree nuts and the higher the number of tree nuts the better.
|
18 months of age
|
|
Difference between the 2 treatment arms in the frequency of tree nuts ingested.
Time Frame: 18 months of age
|
Parent reported tree nut ingestion history based on questionnaire at baseline and 18 months of age.
Range will be never to daily with higher frequency better.
|
18 months of age
|
|
Difference between the two treatment arms in mean change from baseline of Quality of Life Scores using the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ-PF)- Parent Form at 18 months of age.
Time Frame: Baseline and 18 months of age
|
The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaires (FAQLQ) are disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires for patients with food allergy.
FAQLQ-PF (Parent Form), completed by parents of children aged 0-12 years consists of 30 items over 3 domains (emotional impact, food anxiety, social and dietary restrictions).
Total and domain scores are calculated by dividing the sum of completed items by the number of completed items.
Questions are based on a 6 point Likert scale with higher scores indicating greater impact on quality of life
|
Baseline and 18 months of age
|
|
Difference between the two treatment arms in the mean change from baseline in State/Trait anxiety scores using the State/Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline and 18 months of age
|
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a psychological inventory based on a 4-point Likert scale and consists of 40 questions on a self-report basis.
The STAI measures two types of anxiety - state anxiety, or anxiety about an event, and trait anxiety, or anxiety level as a personal characteristic.
The total score ranges from 0-63 with higher scores positively correlated with higher levels of anxiety.
|
Baseline and 18 months of age
|
|
Difference in the number of allergy-related healthcare visits from randomization to 18 months of age between the treatment arms
Time Frame: 18 months of age
|
Captured per number of hospitalizations, Emergency room (ER) visits, physician office visits, and medications / number of prescriptions from randomization to 18 months of age.
|
18 months of age
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kirsten Perrett, MD. PhD, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Sampson HA, Gerth van Wijk R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Sicherer S, Teuber SS, Burks AW, Dubois AE, Beyer K, Eigenmann PA, Spergel JM, Werfel T, Chinchilli VM. Standardizing double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology PRACTALL consensus report. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Dec;130(6):1260-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.017. No abstract available.
- Ball H, Luyt D, Bravin K, Kirk K. Single nut or total nut avoidance in nut allergic children: outcome of nut challenges to guide exclusion diets. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011 Dec;22(8):808-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01191.x. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
- Cifuentes L, Vosseler S, Blank S, Seismann H, Pennino D, Darsow U, Bredehorst R, Ring J, Mempel M, Spillner E, Ollert MW. Identification of Hymenoptera venom-allergic patients with negative specific IgE to venom extract by using recombinant allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Mar;133(3):909-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.047. Epub 2013 Nov 28. No abstract available.
- Dang TD, Mills CE, Allen KJ. Determination of the clinical egg allergy phenotypes using component-resolved diagnostics. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2014 Nov;25(7):639-43. doi: 10.1111/pai.12301. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
- Dang TD, Tang M, Choo S, Licciardi PV, Koplin JJ, Martin PE, Tan T, Gurrin LC, Ponsonby AL, Tey D, Robinson M, Dharmage SC, Allen KJ; HealthNuts study. Increasing the accuracy of peanut allergy diagnosis by using Ara h 2. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Apr;129(4):1056-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.01.056. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
- Ierodiakonou D, Garcia-Larsen V, Logan A, Groome A, Cunha S, Chivinge J, Robinson Z, Geoghegan N, Jarrold K, Reeves T, Tagiyeva-Milne N, Nurmatov U, Trivella M, Leonardi-Bee J, Boyle RJ. Timing of Allergenic Food Introduction to the Infant Diet and Risk of Allergic or Autoimmune Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016 Sep 20;316(11):1181-1192. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12623.
- Lange L, Lasota L, Finger A, Vlajnic D, Busing S, Meister J, Broekaert I, Pfannenstiel C, Friedrichs F, Price M, Trendelenburg V, Niggemann B, Beyer K. Ana o 3-specific IgE is a good predictor for clinically relevant cashew allergy in children. Allergy. 2017 Apr;72(4):598-603. doi: 10.1111/all.13050. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
- McWilliam V, Peters R, Tang MLK, Dharmage S, Ponsonby AL, Gurrin L, Perrett K, Koplin J, Allen KJ; HealthNuts investigators. Patterns of tree nut sensitization and allergy in the first 6 years of life in a population-based cohort. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Feb;143(2):644-650.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.07.038. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
- Mullins RJ, Wainstein BK, Barnes EH, Liew WK, Campbell DE. Increases in anaphylaxis fatalities in Australia from 1997 to 2013. Clin Exp Allergy. 2016 Aug;46(8):1099-110. doi: 10.1111/cea.12748. Epub 2016 May 31.
- Pablos I, Wildner S, Asam C, Wallner M, Gadermaier G. Pollen Allergens for Molecular Diagnosis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016 Apr;16(4):31. doi: 10.1007/s11882-016-0603-z.
- Peters RL, Barret DY, Soriano VX, McWilliam V, Lowe AJ, Ponsonby AL, Tang MLK, Dharmage SC, Gurrin LC, Koplin JJ, Perrett KP. No cashew allergy in infants introduced to cashew by age 1 year. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jan;147(1):383-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 18. No abstract available.
- Savvatianos S, Konstantinopoulos AP, Borga A, Stavroulakis G, Lidholm J, Borres MP, Manousakis E, Papadopoulos NG. Sensitization to cashew nut 2S albumin, Ana o 3, is highly predictive of cashew and pistachio allergy in Greek children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Jul;136(1):192-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.03.037. Epub 2015 May 8. No abstract available.
- Soriano VX, Peters RL, Ponsonby AL, Dharmage SC, Perrett KP, Field MJ, Knox A, Tey D, Odoi S, Gell G, Camesella Perez B, Allen KJ, Gurrin LC, Koplin JJ. Earlier ingestion of peanut after changes to infant feeding guidelines: The EarlyNuts study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Nov;144(5):1327-1335.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.07.032. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
- Thalayasingam M, Noble V, Franzmann A, O'Sullivan M. Outcome of mixed nut biscuit challenges in low-risk patients who are on tree nut exclusion diet. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2015 Nov;26(7):682-4. doi: 10.1111/pai.12437. Epub 2015 Sep 11. No abstract available.
- Togias A, Cooper SF, Acebal ML, Assa'ad A, Baker JR Jr, Beck LA, Block J, Byrd-Bredbenner C, Chan ES, Eichenfield LF, Fleischer DM, Fuchs GJ 3rd, Furuta GT, Greenhawt MJ, Gupta RS, Habich M, Jones SM, Keaton K, Muraro A, Plaut M, Rosenwasser LJ, Rotrosen D, Sampson HA, Schneider LC, Sicherer SH, Sidbury R, Spergel J, Stukus DR, Venter C, Boyce JA. Addendum guidelines for the prevention of peanut allergy in the United States: Report of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-sponsored expert panel. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Jan;139(1):29-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.10.010.
- van der Valk JPM, Bouche RE, Gerth van Wijk R, de Groot H, Wichers HJ, Dubois AEJ, de Jong NW. Low percentage of clinically relevant pistachio nut and mango co-sensitisation in cashew nut sensitised children. Clin Transl Allergy. 2017 Mar 20;7:8. doi: 10.1186/s13601-017-0145-z. eCollection 2017.
- Van Erp FC, Knulst AC, Kok IL, van Velzen MF, van der Ent CK, Meijer Y. Usefulness of open mixed nut challenges to exclude tree nut allergy in children. Clin Transl Allergy. 2015 May 16;5:19. doi: 10.1186/s13601-015-0062-y. eCollection 2015.
- Zahradnik E, Raulf M. Respiratory Allergens from Furred Mammals: Environmental and Occupational Exposure. Vet Sci. 2017 Aug 4;4(3):38. doi: 10.3390/vetsci4030038.
- McWilliam VL, Koplin JJ, Allen K, Robinson M, Smart J, Loke P, Peters RL, Dang T, Lee KJ, Dalziel K, Tey D, Taranto M, Perrett KP. TreEAT trial: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of early introduction of tree nuts for the prevention of tree nut allergy in infants with peanut allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2023 Mar;34(3):e13930. doi: 10.1111/pai.13930.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 29, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
June 29, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 16, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
March 17, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 19, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 16, 2026
Last Verified
February 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 70489
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
The de-identified data set collected for this analysis of the TreEat trial will be available six months after publication of the primary outcome.
The study protocol may be obtained from the Murdoch Children's Research Institute.
Prior to releasing any data the following are required: a data access agreement must be signed between relevant parties, the TreEat trial investigators must see and approve the analysis plan describing how the data will be analyzed, there must be an agreement around appropriate acknowledgment and any additional costs involved must be covered.
Should the study investigators be unavailable, this role is delegated to the Murdoch Children's Research Institute.
Data will only be shared with a recognized research institute which has approved the proposed analysis plan.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
6 months after publication of primary outcome
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Prior to releasing any data the following are required: a data access agreement must be signed between relevant parties, the TreEat trial investigators must see and approve the analysis plan describing how the data will be analyzed, there must be an agreement around appropriate acknowledgment and any additional costs involved must be covered.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Food Allergy in Infants
-
Josefine GradmanNot yet recruitingFood Allergy in Infants
-
Vilnius UniversityEnrolling by invitationFood Allergy in Children | Food Allergy in InfantsLithuania
-
Vilnius UniversityEnrolling by invitationFood Allergy in Children | Food Allergy in InfantsLithuania
-
Murdoch Childrens Research InstituteCompletedFood Allergy | Food Allergy in InfantsAustralia
-
Hasanuddin UniversityArla FoodsCompletedFood Allergy in InfantsIndonesia
-
Prollergy dba Ready Set FoodObvioHealthActive, not recruiting
-
Ruijin HospitalCompleted
-
University of IdahoFree to Feed Inc.CompletedStress | Microbiome | Food Allergy in InfantsUnited States
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)CompletedFood Allergy Peanut | Food Allergy in InfantsUnited States
-
King's College LondonGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustUnknownEgg Allergy | Food Allergy | Food Allergy in Children | Milk Allergy | Food Allergy in Infants | Nut Allergy | Food Allergen SensitisationUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Home introduction
-
Martini Hospital GroningenRecruitingCow Milk Allergy | Food AllergyNetherlands
-
University of RochesterNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)CompletedSmoking CessationUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthMakerere University; The Bloomberg Family Foundation, Inc.; Institute of Epidemiology...CompletedNoncommunicable Diseases | Surveys and QuestionnairesBangladesh, Uganda
-
King's College LondonAction Medical ResearchUnknownObesity, Childhood | Food Allergy in Children | Food Allergen SensitisationUnited Kingdom
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaRegeneron Pharmaceuticals; Genzyme, a Sanofi CompanyCompletedEosinophilic EsophagitisUnited States
-
Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical...CompletedIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic StrokeRussian Federation
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityCompletedChronic RhinosinusitisUnited States
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompletedPremature Infants | Growth Retardation | Nutrition Deficiency Due to Insufficient Food