Transcatheter Self-expandable Valve Implantation for the Treatment of Severe Native Aortic Regurgitation (SEASON-AR)

April 7, 2026 updated by: Shaoliang Chen, MD, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

Transcatheter Self-expandable Valve Implantation for the Treatment of Severe Native Aortic Regurgitation: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Study

Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with severe native aortic valve regurgitation (AR) who have symptoms, impaired LVEF (≤55%) or left ventricular enlargement have the indications for surgery. According to data from the Euro Heart Survey, only 21.8% with LVEF 30-50% and 2.7% with LVEF <30% were referred for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) among patients with severe native aortic regurgitation. Advanced age and comorbidities were often considered as main reasons to refuse SAVR. The annual mortality of untreated patients with severe AR is 10-20%. Pure native AR is always an exclusion criterion in all randomized controlled trials on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR) because the specific anatomical features can preclude adequate valve implantation. Several small, retrospective studies showed that off-label use of TAVR appears to be a feasible treatment choice for AR patients at high risk for SAVR. The present study aims to investigate the use of TAVR in AR patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
210

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Jun-Jie Zhang, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +86-25-52271350
  • Email: jameszll@163.com

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210006
        • Recruiting
        • Nanjing First Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Procedural indications: symptomatic severe aortic regurgitation; no symptom plus left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 55% or left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) > 65mm or left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) > 50mm;
  2. Severe aortic valve regurgitation, and mean pressure gradient < 20mmHg; Annular perimeter ≤ 85 mm;
  3. The ratio of the perimeter of the left ventricular outflow tract 4mm to the perimeter of the valve annulus is 0.95-1.05;

  4. STS score ≥8 or moderate to severe frailty or refused surgical valve replacement or presence of any of the following factors judged to be difficult to perform the surgical valve replacement:

    1. Severe aorta calcification or active ascending aorta atherosclerotic plaque
    2. History of mediastinum radiotherapy
    3. Past mediastinitis
    4. Presence of unobstructed coronary bypass implants
    5. Previous more than two cardiothoracic surgeries
    6. Liver cirrhosis
    7. Other surgical risk factors

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age < 60 years old;
  2. Ascending aorta diameter >45mm;
  3. Coronary multi-vessel disease (SYNTAX score >32);
  4. Life expectancy <1 year;
  5. Left ventricular ejection fraction <30%;
  6. Acute myocardial infarction within 30 days;
  7. Allergies or contraindications to related drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, or contrast agents);
  8. Other situations judged by the researcher as unsuitable for participating in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Medical therapy
Patients in medical therapy will receive conservative care, mainly including angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition (ARNI), diuretics, dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or beta blockers.
Drug: Medical therapy
Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition (ARNI), diuretics, dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or beta blockers.
Other Names:
  • Optimal medical therapy
Experimental: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Patients in TAVR group will receive transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Device: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
The VitaFlow™ system (MicroPort®, Shanghai, China) was a novel TAVR system, which incorporates high-radial force and a double layer polyethylene terephthalate (PET) skirt to optimize frame geometry and minimize the risks of paravalvular leak (PVL). The VitaFlow™ transcatheter aortic valve is made of a self-expanding nitinol frame and tri-leaflet bovine pericardial valve.
Other Names:
  • The VitaFlow™ system (MicroPort®, Shanghai, China)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical worsening
Time Frame: 12 months
A composite of all cause death, disabling stroke, or heart failure rehospitalization
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural complications
Time Frame: 12 months
Any aortic dissection, annular rupture, coronary artery occlusion, vascular complications, permanent pacemaker implantation.
12 months
6-minute walk distance
Time Frame: 12 months
This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes.
12 months
New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class
Time Frame: 12 months
Classification of function capacity of the NYHA.
12 months
Stroke
Time Frame: 12 months
Stroke is defined as an acute episode of focal or global neurological dysfunction caused by the brain, spinal cord, or retinal vascular injury as a result of hemorrhage or infarction.
12 months
Mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
All-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular mortality
12 months
Bleeding Complications
Time Frame: 12 months
The original VARC definitions with BARC classifications
12 months
Prothetic valve dysfunction
Time Frame: 12 months
Any prothetic aortic valve stenosis, prothesis-patient mismatch, prosthetic aortic valve regurgitation
12 months
Rehospitalization
Time Frame: 12 months
Requiring hospitalizations for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Shao-Liang Chen, MD, PhD, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 30, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 7, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NFH20210325

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings