Pilot Evaluation of a Motivational Interviewing Intervention Targeting Adherence Behaviors in Youth With Sickle Cell Disease
Pilot Evaluation of a Telehealth Motivational Interviewing Intervention Targeting Adherence Behaviors in Youth With Sickle Cell Disease
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33701
- Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants will include 13-22 year-old patients with sickle cell disease as well as primary caregivers of 0-22 year-old sickle cell disease patients ("parents"). The lower age limit for patients' participation in their own intervention sessions was selected based on previous studies documenting MI effectiveness with adolescents as young as 13 years of age. The upper limit was selected based on the recruitment site's (JHACH) patient population.
- Participants must be able to speak and understand spoken English because MI is language-dependent.
- The patient's SCD regimen must include at least one of the following medications: Hydroxyurea, Endari, Adakveo, or Oxbryta.
- Patients who meet inclusion criteria may participate even if their parent chooses not to do so, although 13-17 year old patients may only participate with parent consent. Likewise, parents of patients may participate even if the AYA declines their own participation, as long as the AYA assents/consents to medical chart review. Adult patients (18-22 years of age) will not require parent consent and may choose to participate with or without a parent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Potential participants who appear to have cognitive, motor, or language delays, as observed by research personnel or documented in the medical record, will be excluded from this study if delays preclude informed consent and/or study completion. Participants may request that research personnel read all assessment, education, and intervention materials aloud in a structured interview format, in which case participants could respond to items verbally and/or by pointing to visual aids. Because of this option, participants' ability to read and write are not requirements for participation.
- Because the MI component of the intervention is language-dependent and requires significant time and training for certification in another language, non-English speaking patients will only be included in this study if the psychology postdoctoral fellow hired in this study is a native Spanish speaker and can demonstrate MI proficiency in Spanish.
- Participants who score in the clinically significant range (t-scores 2 standard deviations above the mean) on any of the PROMIS measures assessing depression and anxiety will be removed from the study and provided mental health resources.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Arm
Intervention sessions will occur ~once per week, with all 4 sessions being completed within 4-8 weeks.
Each session will include an education and motivational interviewing (MI) component.
|
4 telehealth sessions including a combination of psycho/medical education plus a motivational interviewing component.
|
|
Active Comparator: Education only Arm
Participants in the education-only control arm will receive one education session.
The education session will occur via telephone or telehealth.
Education will include medication purpose and adherence strategy recommendations delivered in a single telehealth session.
|
The control group will receive an education-only session.
Education will include medication purpose and adherence strategy recommendations delivered in a single telehealth session.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in sickle cell disease medication adherence
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
This questionnaire assesses participants' adherence to their sickle cell disease medication.
The questionnaire is titled Sickle Cell Antibiotic Adherence Level Evaluation (SCAALE).
Question items are scored in different directions depending on whether their wording reflects adherence or non-adherence.
For each item, participants will rate each item on a Likert scale, such that the response indicating the 'best' adherence is scored one point and the response indicating the 'worst' adherence is scored five points.
Possible subscale scores range from four points (most adherent) to 20 points (least adherent),and possible total scores range from 24 (most adherent) to 120 (least adherent).
|
Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
|
Intervention feasibility as assessed by the fidelity rating
Time Frame: Post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment)
|
Feasibility of conducting the intervention with high clinician fidelity, as evidenced by fidelity ratings for each session (fidelity represented as a percentage based on the extent to which the clinician covered all planned information for each session).
Average intervention fidelity ratings should meet or exceed 80 percent fidelity.
|
Post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment)
|
|
Intervention acceptability as assessed by the Abbreviated Acceptability Rating Profile
Time Frame: Post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment)
|
Patient and caregiver acceptability of the newly developed intervention, as evidenced by the Abbreviated Acceptability Rating Profile.
Scores range from 8-48, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
Scores equal to or greater than 30 indicate good acceptability per published standards.
|
Post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in sickle cell disease knowledge as assessed by the Sickle-Cell Disease Knowledge Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
Knowledge of sickle cell disease recommendations, as evidenced by scores on the Sickle Cell Disease Knowledge Questionnaire.
Scores range from 0-28, with higher scores indicate greater knowledge.
|
Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
|
Change in healthy lifestyle self-efficacy as assessed by the Adolescent Lifestyle Profile II
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
Self-efficacy maintaining healthy lifestyle behaviors, as evidenced by scores on the Lifestyle Profile II.
Total mean scores range from 1-4 with greater scores indicating greater self-efficacy.
|
Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
|
Change in illness perception as assessed by the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
Perception of illness, as evidenced by scores on the Brief Illness Perception.Questionnaire, Total scores range from 8-10 with greater scores indicating stronger illness perception.
|
Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
|
Change in self-esteem as assessed by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
Self-esteem, as evidenced by scores on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.
Total scores range from 10-40, with greater scores indicating greater self-esteem.
|
Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
|
Change in depression as assessed by the PROMIS Pediatric Depressive Symptoms-Short Form or PROMIS Adult Depressive Symptoms-Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
Depressive symptoms, as evidenced by scores on the PROMIS Pediatric Depressive Symptoms-Short Form or PROMIS Adult Depressive Symptoms-Short Form.
Scores range from 1-40 with greater scores indicate greater depressive symptoms.
|
Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
|
Change in anxiety as assessed by the PROMIS Anxiety Symptoms- Short Form or PROMIS Adult Anxiety Symptoms Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
PROMIS Pediatric Anxiety Symptoms- Short Form or PROMIS Adult Anxiety Symptoms Short Form.
The adult anxiety scores range from 1-35 and the pediatric anxiety score range from 1-40 with greater scores indicate greater anxiety symptoms.
|
Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
|
Change in health literacy as assessed by the Health Literacy Skills Instrument- Short Form for adults or the Health Literacy Assessment Scale for Adolescents (HAS-A)
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
Health literacy scores, as evidenced by scores on the Health Literacy Skills Instrument- Short Form for adults (HLSI-10) or the Health Literacy Assessment Scale for Adolescents (HAS-A).
The HLSI-10 scores range from 0-10 with higher scores indicating higher levels of health literacy.
The HAS-A has 3 scales.
Scores on the Communication subscale range from 0-20 with higher scores representing better interpersonal communication.
Scores on the Confusion subscale range from 0-16 with higher scores representing more confusion.
Scores on the functional health literacy scale range from 0-20 with higher scores indicating a lower ability to read health information and understand numbers.
|
Baseline, post intervention (weeks 4-8 after study enrollment), and 16-20 weeks after study enrollment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Melissa Faith, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00285183
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.