Clinical Evaluation to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of GentleMax Pro Plus
Clinical Evaluation to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of GentleMax Pro/ GentleMax Pro Plus
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Marlborough, Massachusetts, United States, 01752
- Candela Institute of Excellence
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 18 years of age or older
- Willingness to provide signed, informed consent to participate in the study
- Presence of unwanted hair, moderate or greater benign pigmented lesions, active acne, vascular lesions, nails affected with onychomycosis, and/or wrinkles assessed as Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Score (FWS) >/= 1
- Willingness to adhere to study treatment and follow-up schedule
- Willingness to adhere to post-treatment care instructions
- Willingness to allow photographs and/or video of treated areas, and to release their use for scientific/educational and/or promotional/marketing purposes
- Willing to abstain from any other procedures, medications or topicals in the study treatment areas for the duration of the study which the investigator deems would interfere with the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant, planning pregnancy during the study, or breast feeding
- Blonde, grey, or white hair in subjects seeking hair removal
- Tattooed skin in the intended treatment area
- Active sun tan in the intended treatment area
- History of active Herpes Virus Simplex (HSV) or similar condition in the intended treatment area unless treated with prophylactic medication
- History of melanoma
- History of vitiligo in the intended treatment area
- History of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation
- History of Melasma in the intended treatment area or per Investigator's discretion
- Severe immunosuppression resulting from medications and/or a medical condition that could impair healing after treatment
- Open wound or infection in the intended treatment area
- History of light induced seizure disorders
- The subject is not suitable, in the opinion of the Investigator, for participation in the study due to inability to adhere to the study requirements, medical, or other reasons that could compromise the study integrity or subject safety
- Dermatologic and/or cosmetic procedures including use of medications, or topicals in the intended treatment area(s) during a timepoint prior to the study that the investigator deems the subject unsuitable for the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment Arm
All study subjects are to receive treatment with GentleMax Pro Plus device.
Subjects will be scheduled to receive as little as one (1) and up to eight (8) treatments with the GentleMax Pro Plus™ Laser System.
Up to 2 follow-ups will occur.
|
The GentleMax Pro Plus laser system to be used in this study received 510(k) market clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under K201111 on May 26, 2020
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Time
Time Frame: 8 Months
|
Evaluate the speed (time of treatment completion) with larger spot sizes for hair removal
|
8 Months
|
|
Hair Count Assessments
Time Frame: 14 Months
|
Improvement in hair clearance quantified by hair counts taken within a portion of the treatment area and percent reduction by assessments of digital photos taken at Baseline compared to follow-ups.
|
14 Months
|
|
Global Aesthetic Improvement Score
Time Frame: 7 Months
|
Improvement in the appearance of wrinkles, benign pigmented lesions, and/or vascular lesions from baseline to follow-up(s) via the Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (IGAIS) whereas 1 = very much improved and 5 = worse.
A lower score post treatment(s) indicates a better outcome.
|
7 Months
|
|
Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Score
Time Frame: 7 Months
|
Improvement in the appearance of wrinkles from baseline to follow-up(s) via the Investigator Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale whereas 1 = fine wrinkles and mild elastosis and 9 = deep wrinkles and severe elastosis.
A lower score post treatment(s) indicates a better outcome.
|
7 Months
|
|
Pigment Improvement Score
Time Frame: 7 Months
|
Improvement in BPLs from baseline to follow-ups via the Investigator Pigment Improvement Score (PIS) whereas 0 = no improvement and 4 = excellent response.
A higher score post treatment(s) indicates a better outcome.
|
7 Months
|
|
Acne Counts
Time Frame: 5 Months
|
Measured by improvement of acne counts from baseline compared to follow-ups.
A lower score post treatment(s) indicates a better outcome.
|
5 Months
|
|
Onychomycosis Score
Time Frame: 9 Months
|
Improvement in the appearance of nails from Baseline to follow-up(s) via the Scoring Clinical Index of Onychomycosis (SCIO Index) which ranges from 0 to 30 whereas 0 indicates lesser degree of onychomycosis and 30 indicates higher degree of onychomycosis.
A lower score post treatment(s) indicates a better outcome.
|
9 Months
|
|
Onychomycosis Score
Time Frame: 9 Months
|
Improvement in the appearance of nails from Baseline to follow-up(s) via the Onychomycosis Improvement Scale whereas 1 = completely cleared and 5 = worse.
A lower score post treatment(s) indicates a better outcome.
|
9 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subject Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
Overall subject satisfaction with study treatments per treatment indication as measured by Subject Satisfaction Scale whereas 1 = not satisfied and 5 = very satisfied.
A higher score post treatment(s) indicates a better outcome.
|
24 Months
|
|
Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Score
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
Overall subject improvement with study treatments per treatment indication as measured by Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (SGAIS) whereas 1 = very much improved and 5 = worse.
A lower score post treatment(s) indicates a better outcome.
|
24 Months
|
|
Subject Pain
Time Frame: 8 Months
|
Measurement of Subject Pain Assessment post-treatment for all subjects, using an 11-point pain Numerical Rating Scale where 0=no pain, 10=extreme pain
|
8 Months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- GMP19002, phase II
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.