The Cascade Feasibility Pilot (HF) Phase 3

March 18, 2025 updated by: Nirav Shah, Endeavor Health

The Cascade Feasibility Pilot (HF): Improving Care Processes for Heart Failure Patients Using Continuous Remote Patient Monitoring and a Cascading Alert System

The study proposal is to deploy a wearable solution that predicts physiological perturbation comparable to invasive devices and to perform continuous remote patient monitoring; this will be connected to a structured, cascading, escalation pathway involving home health nurses, advanced practitioner providers, and heart failure specialists, and has the potential to transform heart failure management in the post-discharge period, where patients are the most vulnerable for readmission. This feasibility study will contribute to the understanding of post-discharge heart failure continuous remote patient monitoring, promote patient self-care, and has the potential of improving patient outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Heart failure is a leading cause of hospital readmission. It results in significant mortality, morbidity, and health care utilization. Effective continuous remote patient monitoring (CRPM) can reduce readmissions, but it has only been realized via invasive monitoring. The study will focus on non-invasive heart failure CRPM through a structured cascading and escalating alert system. In this feasibility study, the study team will use a wearable biosensor and collect ambulatory physiological data that are analyzed by machine learning algorithms, potentially identifying physiological perturbation in heart failure patients. Alerts from this algorithm may be cascaded with other patient status data to inform management by the home health team via a structured protocol. The escalation pathway will engage home health, advanced practitioner providers, and heart failure specialists. In the first aim, the study team will perform a soft launch on five patients with an extensive evaluation to assess feasibility for the pilot trial. In aim 2, the study team will implement the feasibility pilot study. In aim 2a, the study team will conduct surveys and semi-structured interviews with both providers and patients. The surveys and interviews will be applied at three time points (initiation, maintenance, and post-study) to evaluate perceptions, acceptance, and experience of this CRPM solution. In aim 2b, the investigators will leverage temporal data mining, feature extraction, and patient clustering methods to identify valid patterns associated with the pathophysiological events of interest, using continuous physiological data, patient reports, and electronic health record data. The study team will also compare outcome and process measures from our pilot study to a retrospective cohort matched for key demographics and disease severity. This feasibility study will provide key learning for a larger efficacy clinical trial to evaluate if this non-invasive telemonitoring solution tied to structured patient management via cascading and escalating alert pathways can improve outcomes and reduce heart failure readmission.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
54

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
        • NorthShore University HealthSystem Evanston Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is an inpatient at Evanston Hospital
  • Patient is followed by the heart failure service team after discharge
  • Patient has a history of heart failure
  • Patient received at least one dose of IV diuretic at index hospitalization
  • Symptoms corresponding to NYHA function class II-IV
  • Patient has heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<40%, or HF with mid-ranged ejection fraction (LVEF 40-50%), or HF with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF≥50%)
  • Patient is in the top 50% risk of readmission across NorthShore University HealthSystem's CAPE 30-day readmission model
  • Patient is at least 18 years of age
  • Patient is fluent in English
  • Patient agrees to protocol-required procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has cognitive or physical limitations that, in the investigator's opinion, limit the patient's ability to maintain patch device and phone
  • Patient has visual impairments
  • Patient has an allergy to hydrocolloid adhesives
  • Patient has present skin damage preventing them from wearing a study device
  • Patient has renal dysfunction requiring dialysis
  • Patient has CardioMEMS
  • Pregnancy
  • Patient receiving hospice care

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Pilot
39 eligible HF patients
Other: Affective Analysis of Participant Response to Continuous Remote Patient Monitoring
Surveys and interviews with enrolled participants
Other: Non-invasive continuous remote monitoring with structured escalation pathway
Continuous patient monitoring through non-invasive biosensors coupled with machine learning algorithms, with a structured escalation and communication pathway for home health providers and HF care team

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enrollment Rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average 1 year
Enrollment rate for entire patient cohort
Through study completion, an average 1 year
Adherence Rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of one year
Patient adherence to electronic patient reported outcomes
Through study completion, an average of one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Documented Diuretic Escalation
Time Frame: 30 days from patient discharge date
Number of patients on escalated diuretics dosage by the clinical care team during monitoring period
30 days from patient discharge date
30-day Readmission Rate
Time Frame: 30 days from patient discharge date
30-day readmission rate from the day of discharge
30 days from patient discharge date

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Endeavor Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nirav S Shah, Endeavor Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 18, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EH20-288 Cascade HF

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings