Quality of Life After POEM for Achalasia

August 17, 2021 updated by: Xiangbin Xing, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Health-Related Quality of Life After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Patients With Achalasia

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder, characterized by insufficient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and loss of esophageal peristalsis. Patients with achalasia experience distressing gastrointestinal symptoms, including dysphagia, reflux and chest pain, which lead to weight loss and malnutrition. Undoubtedly, health-related quality of life can be significantly diminished in patients with achalasia. At present, POEM has become one of the standard therapies for achalasia. Limited studies have focused on the patient's quality of life before and after POEM. The present study aimed to assess the changes in quality of life of patients with achalasia using the validated achalasia severity questionnaire (ASQ) and the short form (SF)-36 scale.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Xiangbin Xing, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +862087755766
  • Email: xxbken@163.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients schedule to undergo POEM for treatment of symptomatic achalasia in one tertiary hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed as achalasia base on high resolution manometry, barium esophagram and upper endoscopy
  • Scheduled to undergo POEM for treatment of achalasia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coagulopathy and systemic disorders that precluded safe general anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Achalasia patients
Patients schedule to undergo POEM for treatment of symptomatic achalasia. The diagnosis of achalasia was based on high resolution manometry, barium esophagram, and upper endoscopy.
Procedure: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)
POEM is performed as previously described by Inoue et al (Endoscopy 2010), including four main steps mucosal incision, submucosal tunneling, myotomy and mucosal entry closure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Achalasia symptom questionnaire (ASQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, Change from Baseline ASQ score at 3 months and 12 months after treatment
Achalasia symptom questionnaire assess the disease-specific health-related quality of life by sampling the concepts of food tolerance, dysphagia-related behavior modifications, pain, heartburn, distress, lifestyle limitation, and satisfaction in 10 items. The total range is 10 to 31, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life (Urbach et al, Am J Gastroenterol 2005).
Baseline, Change from Baseline ASQ score at 3 months and 12 months after treatment
Short form (SF)-36
Time Frame: Baseline, Change from Baseline SF-36 score at 3 months and 12 months after treatment
The short form (SF)-36 (best score 100, worst score 0). The short form (SF)-36 assess the health-related quality of life from 8 aspects, including physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health in 36 items. The total range is 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse quality of life (Ware et al, J Clin Epidemiol 1998).
Baseline, Change from Baseline SF-36 score at 3 months and 12 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eckardt score
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
The Eckardt score assesses the severity of achalasia symptoms by combining the sum of symptom frequency scores for dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain and a weight loss score. Each component can be graded from 0 to 3 points. The total range is 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms (Eckardt AJ et al, Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011).
baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) score
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
The GerdQ has been developed as a tool to facilitate the symptom-based diagnosis of GERD. Scores ranging from 0 to 3 were applied for the four positive predictors (heartburn, regurgitation, sleep disturbance due to reflux symptoms and use of over-the-counter medications for reflux symptoms) and from 3 to 0 for two negative predictors (epigastric pain and nausea). The GerdQ score was calculated as the sum of these scores, giving a total score ranging from 0 to 18. A total GerdQ score >7 is considered indicative of significant GERD symptoms (Jones R et al, Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009).
baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
Reflux esophagitis on post-POEM endoscopy
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
The severity of reflux esophagitis is graded according to the Los Angeles classification (Armstrong D et al, Gastroenterology 1996).
3 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Xiangbin Xing, MD, PhD, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 124

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings