Conduction System Pacing With Left Bundle Branch Pacing as Compared to Standard Right Ventricular Pacing

March 9, 2026 updated by: Jacqueline Joza, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

LEFT Bundle Pacing vs Standard Right Ventricular Pacing for Heart Failure

High burden right ventricular (RV) pacing has been shown to increase cardiovascular mortality, incidence of heart failure (HF), worsen left ventricular (LV) function and accelerate the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). High percentage ventricular pacing and wider paced QRS in the setting of normal baseline LV ejection fractions have consistently been shown to be independent risk factors for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as a potential alternative pacing mechanism that may avoid LV dyssynchrony and pacing-induced LV dysfunction by mimicking native electrical conduction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

We hypothesize that in patients with high degree AV block with anticipated ventricular pacing >90%, and an EF >35% patients undergoing LBBP will demonstrate a significantly lower number of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, heart failure events, and change in LVESVi as compared to standard RV pacing. Echos will be performed at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months. NTproBNPs are performed at baseline and follow-up. There will be a core echo lab, and blinded adjudication of ECGs and events.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1300

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3Y2T6
        • Recruiting
        • McGill University Health Centre-Research Institute
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jacqueline Joza
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Atul Verma

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Patients with an ejection fraction of >35%

  3. Patients with an indication for ventricular pacing and high-degree atrioventricular block where the degree of anticipated RV pacing is >90% including:

    1. Third degree AV block
    2. Symptomatic or asymptomatic second-degree AV block
    3. First degree AV block ≥ 280ms with a narrow QRS, or ≥ 240ms with an intraventricular delay (QRS duration ≥120ms)
  4. Echocardiogram within the last 3 months, with ability to have DICOM images

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Indication for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  2. Presence of a mechanical tricuspid valve
  3. Any prior attempt at implantation of an ICD, CRT, HBP, or LBBP
  4. Lack of capacity to consent
  5. Other serious medical condition with life expectancy of <2 years
  6. Pregnancy
  7. Patients in whom the conduction system abnormality is expected to be transient or recover over time
  8. Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Right ventricular pacing
Device: Right ventricular active fixation lead
Active fixation lead (standard)
Experimental: left bundle branch pacing
Device: Left bundle branch pacing lead
Implantation of a left bundle branch pacing lead via sheath, to perform selective or non-selective pacing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to cardiovascular death
Time Frame: 36 months
Clinical
36 months
Time to first heart failure event
Time Frame: 36 months
Defined as: (i) Emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalization for HF (requiring signs and symptoms consistent with congestive heart failure (CHF) that is responsive to oral or parenteral medications); (ii) intensification of therapy (intravenous diuretic therapy on an outpatient basis); or (iii) indication for device upgrade to CRT due to deteriorating LV function defined as an absolute decline in LVEF ≥ 10% from baseline and an LVEF ≤ 40%
36 months
Worsening LV end systolic volume index by 2 years
Time Frame: 24 months
Defined as a 15% increase from baseline each year up to the two-year echo
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: 24 months
CV-related
24 months
New visit for Heart Failure
Time Frame: 24 months
Heart failure visit is defined as: i) Emergency department visit or hospitalization for signs and symptoms of HF that is responsive to oral or intravenous diuretics ii) intensification of therapy defined as outpatient intravenous diuretic therapy, and iii) device upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
24 months
Total mortality
Time Frame: 24 months
Total mortality
24 months
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: 24 months
Echo parameter, change from baseline to 24 months
24 months
Change in NTproBNP level
Time Frame: 24 months
From baseline to 24 months
24 months
Atrial fibrillation progression
Time Frame: 24 months
Atrial fibrillation burden as noted on pacemaker
24 months
Development of new tricuspid regurgitation
Time Frame: 24 months
More than mild TR from baseline
24 months
Presence of Mitral regurgitation
Time Frame: 24 months
Progression/Development from baseline
24 months
Change in Lead parameter
Time Frame: 24 months
stability of impedance, sensing, thresholds
24 months
Quality of Life Improvement
Time Frame: Evaluated at 1, 12, and 24 months, measure as compared to baseline
Health related quality of life score: Short Form 12
Evaluated at 1, 12, and 24 months, measure as compared to baseline
Safety of procedure and long-term safety
Time Frame: 24 months
Procedural and long-term safety of left bundle pacing
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 9, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2021-7452

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings