Conduction System Pacing With Left Bundle Branch Pacing as Compared to Standard Right Ventricular Pacing

LEFT Bundle Pacing vs Standard Right Ventricular Pacing for Heart Failure

High burden right ventricular (RV) pacing has been shown to increase cardiovascular mortality, incidence of heart failure (HF), worsen left ventricular (LV) function and accelerate the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). High percentage ventricular pacing and wider paced QRS in the setting of normal baseline LV ejection fractions have consistently been shown to be independent risk factors for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as a potential alternative pacing mechanism that may avoid LV dyssynchrony and pacing-induced LV dysfunction by mimicking native electrical conduction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

We hypothesize that in patients with high degree AV block with anticipated ventricular pacing >90%, and an EF >35% patients undergoing LBBP will demonstrate a significantly lower number of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, heart failure events, and change in LVESVi as compared to standard RV pacing. Echos will be performed at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months. NTproBNPs are performed at baseline and follow-up. There will be a core echo lab, and blinded adjudication of ECGs and events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3Y2T6
        • Recruiting
        • McGill University Health Centre-Research Institute
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jacqueline Joza
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Atul Verma

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Patients with an ejection fraction of >35%
  3. Patients with an indication for ventricular pacing and high-degree atrioventricular block where the degree of anticipated RV pacing is >90% including:

    1. Third degree AV block
    2. Symptomatic or asymptomatic second-degree AV block
    3. First degree AV block ≥ 280ms with a narrow QRS, or ≥ 240ms with an intraventricular delay (QRS duration ≥120ms)
  4. Echocardiogram within the last 3 months, with ability to have DICOM images

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Indication for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  2. Presence of a mechanical tricuspid valve
  3. Any prior attempt at implantation of an ICD, CRT, HBP, or LBBP
  4. Lack of capacity to consent
  5. Other serious medical condition with life expectancy of <2 years
  6. Pregnancy
  7. Patients in whom the conduction system abnormality is expected to be transient or recover over time
  8. Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Right ventricular pacing
Active fixation lead (standard)
Experimental: left bundle branch pacing
Implantation of a left bundle branch pacing lead via sheath, to perform selective or non-selective pacing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to cardiovascular death
Time Frame: 36 months
Clinical
36 months
Worsening LV end systolic vloume index at 2 years
Time Frame: 24 months
Defined as a 15% increase from baseline on the two-year echo
24 months
Time to first heart failure event
Time Frame: 36 months
Defined as: (i) Emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalization for HF (requiring signs and symptoms consistent with congestive heart failure (CHF) that is responsive to oral or parenteral medications); (ii) intensification of therapy (intravenous diuretic therapy on an outpatient basis); or (iii) indication for device upgrade to CRT due to deteriorating LV function defined as an absolute decline in LVEF ≥ 10% from baseline and an LVEF ≤ 40%
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: 24 months
CV-related
24 months
New visit for Heart Failure
Time Frame: 24 months
Heart failure visit is defined as: i) Emergency department visit or hospitalization for signs and symptoms of HF that is responsive to oral or intravenous diuretics ii) intensification of therapy defined as outpatient intravenous diuretic therapy, and iii) device upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
24 months
Total mortality
Time Frame: 24 months
Total mortality
24 months
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: 24 months
Echo parameter, change from baseline to 24 months
24 months
Change in NTproBNP level
Time Frame: 24 months
From baseline to 24 months
24 months
Atrial fibrillation progression
Time Frame: 24 months
Atrial fibrillation burden as noted on pacemaker
24 months
Development of new tricuspid regurgitation
Time Frame: 24 months
More than mild TR from baseline
24 months
Presence of Mitral regurgitation
Time Frame: 24 months
Progression/Development from baseline
24 months
Change in Lead parameter
Time Frame: 24 months
stability of impedance, sensing, thresholds
24 months
Quality of Life Improvement
Time Frame: Evaluated at 1, 12, and 24 months, measure as compared to baseline
Health related quality of life score: Short Form 12
Evaluated at 1, 12, and 24 months, measure as compared to baseline
Safety of procedure and long-term safety
Time Frame: 24 months
Procedural and long-term safety of left bundle pacing
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Block

Clinical Trials on Left bundle branch pacing lead (Select Secure 3830 lead)

3
Subscribe