Investigating the Causal Role of Prefrontal Control in Decision-making in Patients With Anhedonia (DEBRA)

May 30, 2024 updated by: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Causal Role of Delta-beta Coupling for Goal-directed Behavior in Anhedonia

Investigating whether delta-beta cross-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation can increase goal-directed behavior in participants with major depressive disorder and elevated symptoms of anhedonia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate the causal role that delta-beta coupling plays in goal-directed behavior in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) and symptoms of anhedonia. The participants will perform a reward-based decision-making task. During the task, cross-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) will be delivered at delta-beta frequency, a control-frequency, or an active sham. Electroencephalography will be collected in intermittent resting-state periods. Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be collected during the resting-state and during performance of the task.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
35

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Have normal to corrected vision
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
  • Speak and understand English
  • Low suicide risk as determined by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), and by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D; less than 3 for the suicidality item).
  • Negative pregnancy test for female participants
  • Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) with 9 items greater than or equal to 10 and a diagnosis of major depressive disorder on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Attention deficit (hyperactivity) disorder (currently under treatment)
  • Neurological disorders and conditions, including, but not limited to: History of epilepsy, seizures (except childhood febrile seizures), dementia, history of stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, cerebral aneurysm, brain tumors
  • Medical or neurological illness or treatment for a medical disorder that could interfere with study participation (e.g., unstable cardiac disease, HIV/AIDS, malignancy, liver or renal impairment)
  • Prior brain surgery
  • Any brain devices/implants, including cochlear implants and aneurysm clips
  • History of current traumatic brain injury
  • (For females) Pregnant or breast feeding
  • Anything that, in the opinion of the investigator, would place the participant at increased risk or preclude the participant's full compliance with or completion of the study
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders version 5 diagnosis of present moderate or severe substance use disorder or alcohol use disorder, and past severe substance use disorder or alcohol use disorder, or psychotic disorder within the last 12 months
  • Not taking medications for attention deficit (hyperactivity) disorder or benzodiazepines as these medications often produce specific EEG activity that may disrupt our interpretation of the findings
  • If major depressive disorder is experienced in episode, the participant must currently be within a depressive episode.
  • Contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): ferrous metal inside the body, jewelry must be removable, pacemaker or cochlear implant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Delta-beta tACS
The study is investigating the use of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The stimulation is delivered at 1 milliampere (mA) zero-to-peak amplitude at the target electrodes and 2 mA zero to-peak amplitude at the return electrode. For the experimental arm, the tACS will be delivered using the cross-frequency stimulation waveform delta-beta (3-20Hz).
Device: Cross-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation via the NeuroConn Direct Current Stimulator Plus
Stimulation will be delivered via the NeuroConn Direct Current Stimulator Plus, an investigational electrical non-invasive brain stimulation device that is being used for foundational neuroscience and translational research.
Active Comparator: Theta-gamma tACS
This arm serves as an active control where tACS will be delivered using the cross-frequency stimulation waveform theta-gamma (5-50Hz).
Device: Cross-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation via the NeuroConn Direct Current Stimulator Plus
Stimulation will be delivered via the NeuroConn Direct Current Stimulator Plus, an investigational electrical non-invasive brain stimulation device that is being used for foundational neuroscience and translational research.
Sham Comparator: Active-sham tACS
For active sham stimulation, either delta-beta or theta-gamma stimulation is delivered for 10 seconds and then returns to baseline. This is intended to mimic the skin sensations (e.g., itching, burning, tingling) that are experienced at the onset of stimulation, assisting with blinding the participant's assignment.
Device: Cross-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation via the NeuroConn Direct Current Stimulator Plus
Stimulation will be delivered via the NeuroConn Direct Current Stimulator Plus, an investigational electrical non-invasive brain stimulation device that is being used for foundational neuroscience and translational research.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Percentage of Trials That the Participant Chooses to Perform the Hard Task
Time Frame: Baseline (Hour 1), Stimulation (Hours 2 through 3)
In the Expenditure of Effort for Reward Task, participants are faced with a decision on every trial: to choose an easy task with a low effort exertion for a chance at winning a low amount of money or a hard task with a high effort exertion for a chance at winning a greater amount of money. The incentive for the high effort exertion is changed on each trial and the participant gets physically tired from repeated effort exertion. Goal-directed behavior was calculated as the percentage of trials in which the participant decides to perform the high effort exertion. The average of the 4 blocks prior to stimulation served as a baseline (1st hour). The effect of the intervention was the average of the next 8 blocks during stimulation (hours 2 through 3).
Baseline (Hour 1), Stimulation (Hours 2 through 3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Coupling Strength Between Low-frequency Prefrontal Signals and High-frequency Posterior Signals
Time Frame: Baseline (Hour 1), Stimulation (Hours 2 through 3)
Coupling strength was estimated using the Mean Vector Length calculation between the phase of low-frequency electrical activity in prefrontal electrodes and amplitude of high-frequency activity in posterior cortex. A hybrid signal was created using high-frequency amplitude and low-frequency phase. The magnitude of the average of this signal over time is the coupling strength. Coupling strength was normalized using a z-transformation relative to a null distribution generated by randomly time-shifting the high-frequency data relative to the low-frequency data (z-score). A value of zero represents no coupling. A higher value represents greater coupling strength, which is generally associated with better cognition. Values range from -3 to 3 and a score greater than 1.6 means the coupling is present. The average of the 4 blocks prior to stimulation served as a baseline (1st hour). The effect of the intervention was the average of the next 8 blocks during stimulation (hours 2 through 3).
Baseline (Hour 1), Stimulation (Hours 2 through 3)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Flavio Frohlich, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 30, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 21-1321
  • 1K99MH126161-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

from 9 to 36 months following publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings