Denosumab vs Zoledronic Acid and Osteoporotic Compression Fracture

February 18, 2023 updated by: Shenzhen People's Hospital

Attending Physician of Shenzhen People's Hospital

Bone mineral density and function at 1 year after screw fixation with denosumab vs zoledronic acid for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a parallel double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Conduct a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial according to clinical Trial Reporting Standards (CONSORT). Bone mineral density and function of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) were compared 1 year after screw internal fixation with denosumab vs zoledronic acid in Shenzhen People's Hospital from September, 2021 to November, 2022. The study was approved by Shenzhen People's Hospital and informed consent was signed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
122

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be age between 40 and 90 years old
  • X-ray diagnosis of 1-2 vertebral compression fractures
  • Dual eneragy X ray test for bone mineral density T value less than -1
  • fracture history lasted within 6 weeks
  • Must be MRI showed bone marrow edema of injured segment
  • Must be lower back pain, local spines tenderness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Must be able to have no posterior vertebral wall fracture
  • Must be able to have no patients with intervertebral fissure
  • Must be able to have no infection
  • Must be able to have no malignancy
  • Must be able to have no neurological dysfunction
  • Must be able to have no calcium level ≤2.13 mmol/L
  • Must be able to have no previous use of anti-osteoporosis drugs
  • Must be able to have no inability to perform magnetic resonance imaging
  • Must be able to have no prior back surgery
  • Must be able to have no other established contraindications for elective surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: zoledronic acid
intravenous zoledronic acid and placebo /6 months subcutaneously
Drug: Zoledronic acid
Iv zoledronic acid and placebo /6 months subcutaneously
Other Names:
  • Zoledronic acid intravenous once a year
Experimental: denosumab
Denosumab 60mg/6 months subcutaneously + placebo intravenous
Drug: Denosumab
Denosumab 60mg/6 months subcutaneously + placebo iv
Other Names:
  • Denosumab 6 month/subcutaneous

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
age
Time Frame: up to 12 months
participants age
up to 12 months
sex
Time Frame: up to 12 months
participants sex
up to 12 months
height
Time Frame: up to 12 months
participants height cm
up to 12 months
BMI
Time Frame: up to 12 months
participants body mass index
up to 12 months
Serum total calcium
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Serum total calcium level
up to 12 months
hip bone mineral density
Time Frame: up to 12 months
DEXA for hip bone mineral density
up to 12 months
MRI for lumber
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Bone marrow edema and adjacent intervertebral disc were detected by MRI
up to 12 months
serum osteocalcin
Time Frame: up to 12 months
osteocalcin in the N terminal molecular fragment
up to 12 months
serum Procollagen type 1 n-terminal propeptide P1NP
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Procollagen type 1 n-terminal propeptide
up to 12 months
serum C-terminal cross-linked type 1 collagen terminal peptide CTX
Time Frame: up to 12 months
C-terminal cross-linked type 1 collagen terminal peptide
up to 12 months
lumber spine bone mineral density
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Dual energy X ray for lumber spine bone mineral density
up to 12 months
pain visual analogue scores (VAS)
Time Frame: up to 12 months
pain visual analogue scores (VAS) use categories to differentiate pain intensity. There is a wide variability of terms used to describe each category and the rating may be divided into four (0 -3) or six (0 -5) categories. Patients score their pain intensity from absent (0) to severe (3) or from none (0) to very severe (5)
up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: up to 12 month
EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
up to 12 month
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 12 month
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is a health status measure designed to be completed by patients to assess physical disability due to low back pain.
up to 12 month
QUALEFFO-31
Time Frame: up to 12 month
Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) was developed in 1997 to evaluate quality of life for patients with osteoporosis. The questionnaire assesses quality of life in the aspect of pain, physical function, social function, general health, and mental health
up to 12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shenzhen People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 5, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 18, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ShenzhenPH spine wang04

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings