Denosumab vs Zoledronic Acid and Osteoporotic Compression Fracture

February 18, 2023 updated by: Shenzhen People's Hospital

Attending Physician of Shenzhen People's Hospital

Bone mineral density and function at 1 year after screw fixation with denosumab vs zoledronic acid for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a parallel double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Conduct a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial according to clinical Trial Reporting Standards (CONSORT). Bone mineral density and function of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) were compared 1 year after screw internal fixation with denosumab vs zoledronic acid in Shenzhen People's Hospital from September, 2021 to November, 2022. The study was approved by Shenzhen People's Hospital and informed consent was signed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

122

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be age between 40 and 90 years old
  • X-ray diagnosis of 1-2 vertebral compression fractures
  • Dual eneragy X ray test for bone mineral density T value less than -1
  • fracture history lasted within 6 weeks
  • Must be MRI showed bone marrow edema of injured segment
  • Must be lower back pain, local spines tenderness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Must be able to have no posterior vertebral wall fracture
  • Must be able to have no patients with intervertebral fissure
  • Must be able to have no infection
  • Must be able to have no malignancy
  • Must be able to have no neurological dysfunction
  • Must be able to have no calcium level ≤2.13 mmol/L
  • Must be able to have no previous use of anti-osteoporosis drugs
  • Must be able to have no inability to perform magnetic resonance imaging
  • Must be able to have no prior back surgery
  • Must be able to have no other established contraindications for elective surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: zoledronic acid
intravenous zoledronic acid and placebo /6 months subcutaneously
Iv zoledronic acid and placebo /6 months subcutaneously
Other Names:
  • Zoledronic acid intravenous once a year
Experimental: denosumab
Denosumab 60mg/6 months subcutaneously + placebo intravenous
Denosumab 60mg/6 months subcutaneously + placebo iv
Other Names:
  • Denosumab 6 month/subcutaneous

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
age
Time Frame: up to 12 months
participants age
up to 12 months
sex
Time Frame: up to 12 months
participants sex
up to 12 months
height
Time Frame: up to 12 months
participants height cm
up to 12 months
BMI
Time Frame: up to 12 months
participants body mass index
up to 12 months
Serum total calcium
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Serum total calcium level
up to 12 months
hip bone mineral density
Time Frame: up to 12 months
DEXA for hip bone mineral density
up to 12 months
MRI for lumber
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Bone marrow edema and adjacent intervertebral disc were detected by MRI
up to 12 months
serum osteocalcin
Time Frame: up to 12 months
osteocalcin in the N terminal molecular fragment
up to 12 months
serum Procollagen type 1 n-terminal propeptide P1NP
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Procollagen type 1 n-terminal propeptide
up to 12 months
serum C-terminal cross-linked type 1 collagen terminal peptide CTX
Time Frame: up to 12 months
C-terminal cross-linked type 1 collagen terminal peptide
up to 12 months
lumber spine bone mineral density
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Dual energy X ray for lumber spine bone mineral density
up to 12 months
pain visual analogue scores (VAS)
Time Frame: up to 12 months
pain visual analogue scores (VAS) use categories to differentiate pain intensity. There is a wide variability of terms used to describe each category and the rating may be divided into four (0 -3) or six (0 -5) categories. Patients score their pain intensity from absent (0) to severe (3) or from none (0) to very severe (5)
up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: up to 12 month
EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
up to 12 month
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 12 month
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is a health status measure designed to be completed by patients to assess physical disability due to low back pain.
up to 12 month
QUALEFFO-31
Time Frame: up to 12 month
Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) was developed in 1997 to evaluate quality of life for patients with osteoporosis. The questionnaire assesses quality of life in the aspect of pain, physical function, social function, general health, and mental health
up to 12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 5, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ShenzhenPH spine wang04

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Denosumab vs Zoledronate

Clinical Trials on Zoledronic acid

3
Subscribe