The Feasibility of an Online Intergenerational Co-parenting Program
The Feasibility of an Online Intergenerational Co-parenting Program for Father-mother-grandmother Triad on the Intergenerational Co-parenting Relationship in the Perinatal Period
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hong Kong, China
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University
-
-
Guangdong
-
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518028
- Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- the inclusion criteria for this study will be: (1) first time expectant parents (at least 18 years old) and should be married couples; (2) women have no pregnancy complications and around 34 weeks gestation (33-35 weeks); (3) women have regular antenatal check-ups in the study hospital and are going to deliver in the study hospital; (4) women living in Shenzhen together with husband, is cared by their mother-in-law at recruitment and will be taken care of by their mother-in-law in Shenzhen during the postpartum period; (5) Both parents and grandmothers could understand, read and speak mandarin and are willing to take part in this study; (6) Both parents and grandmothers are able to use smart phone and know how to use Wechat since the message from the online platform is pushed to Wechat in this study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intergeneration coparenting families will be excluded if members of the family unit with reported mental health problems, such as schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorders, etc.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control group
Participants in the control group will receive usual care.
|
Families in the control group will be provided with routine care, including regular antenatal check ups, one bed side education (within 24 hours after delivery), one group session with discharge precautions (3rd to 5th day postpartum), two home visits (first week and second week after discharge respectively), and two physical body check at hospital on the 30th and 42nd day postpartum.
Contents of the bed side education, pre-discharge education and home visits focuses on health related information, such as postpartum care, infant care and breastfeeding, etc.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: an online intergenerational co-parenting programme
Those who are randomized to the intervention group will receive the intergenerational co-parenting program in addition to the usual care, including 3 weekly antenatal sessions (start from 33-35 weeks gestation) and 2 weekly postnatal sessions (start from the first week after discharge from hospital).
The essential components and focus of the intergenerational co-parenting program were developed based on the themes identified from the two qualitative studies, the systematic review of co-parenting interventions, and the proposed intergenerational co-parenting model.
The intervention will be delivered online through an education platform of the study hospital.
|
The program is proposed to include five sessions, with three antenatal sessions to be offered weekly during the 34-36 weeks gestation and two postnatal sessions weekly starting from the first week after discharge from hospital.
The intervention will be delivered online.The program is designed for the intergenerational co-parenting families to undertake with parents together with grandmothers.
The online courses will be delivered by an online platform in the study hospital.
The first session will be pushed to participants in the intervention group within 2 days (around 34 weeks gestation) after recruitment.
The second and third session will be pushed around 35 and 36 weeks gestation separately.
The first postnatal session will be provided around the first to second week postpartum; and second postnatal session will be provided around the third to fourth week postpartum.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
intergenerational co-parenting relationship
Time Frame: 6 weeks postpartum
|
The Chinese version of Co-parenting relationship Scale (Feinberg et al., 2012; Li & Wei, 2018) will be used to assess the intergenerational co-parenting relationship between mothers and grandmothers reported by mothers.
There are 38 items in the Chinese version of CRS.
The total score ranges from 38 to 266.
The Exploratory Factor Analysis adopted 7 factors.
The internal consistency ranged from 0.65 to 0.87, the split half reliability was 0.60 to 0.86, and the test-retest reliability was 0.38 to 0.71.
Higher scores indicate better intergenerational co-parenting relationship.
|
6 weeks postpartum
|
|
intergenerational co-parenting relationship
Time Frame: 3 months postpartum
|
The Chinese version of Co-parenting relationship Scale (Feinberg et al., 2012; Li & Wei, 2018) will be used to assess the intergenerational co-parenting relationship between mothers and grandmothers reported by mothers.
There are 38 items in the Chinese version of CRS.
The total score ranges from 38 to 266.
The Exploratory Factor Analysis adopted 7 factors.
The internal consistency ranged from 0.65 to 0.87, the split half reliability was 0.60 to 0.86, and the test-retest reliability was 0.38 to 0.71.
Higher scores indicate better intergenerational co-parenting relationship.
|
3 months postpartum
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The depressive symptoms of co-parenting members
Time Frame: baseline at around 33-35 weeks gestation
|
The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (Radloff, 1977) will be used.
The scale contains 20 items.
The participants are asked to recall the symptoms that they experienced during the past week and respond with answers on a 4-point frequency.
Each item is scored from 0 to 3, with total scores ranging from 0 to 60.
A higher score indicates greater depression.
|
baseline at around 33-35 weeks gestation
|
|
The depressive symptoms of co-parenting members
Time Frame: 6 weeks postpartum
|
The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (Radloff, 1977) will be used.
The scale contains 20 items.
The participants are asked to recall the symptoms that they experienced during the past week and respond with answers on a 4-point frequency.
Each item is scored from 0 to 3, with total scores ranging from 0 to 60.
A higher score indicates greater depression.
|
6 weeks postpartum
|
|
The depressive symptoms of co-parenting members
Time Frame: 3 months postpartum
|
The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (Radloff, 1977) will be used.
The scale contains 20 items.
The participants are asked to recall the symptoms that they experienced during the past week and respond with answers on a 4-point frequency.
Each item is scored from 0 to 3, with total scores ranging from 0 to 60.
A higher score indicates greater depression.
|
3 months postpartum
|
|
The perceived stress of co-parenting members
Time Frame: baseline at around 33-35 weeks gestation
|
The short version of Perceived Stress Scale-4 (Cohen, 1983) will be to assess the perceived stress of co-parenting members.
It consists of 4 items.
Respondents rate each item with the frequency with which they experienced stress in the last month, ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often).
The total score rangs from 0 to 16.
Higher scores indicate that the respondents suffer from greater stress.
|
baseline at around 33-35 weeks gestation
|
|
The perceived stress of co-parenting members
Time Frame: 6 weeks postpartum
|
The short version of Perceived Stress Scale-4 (Cohen, 1983) will be to assess the perceived stress of co-parenting members.
It consists of 4 items.
Respondents rate each item with the frequency with which they experienced stress in the last month, ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often).
The total score rangs from 0 to 16.
Higher scores indicate that the respondents suffer from greater stress.
|
6 weeks postpartum
|
|
The perceived stress of co-parenting members
Time Frame: 3 months postpartum
|
The short version of Perceived Stress Scale-4 (Cohen, 1983) will be to assess the perceived stress of co-parenting members.
It consists of 4 items.
Respondents rate each item with the frequency with which they experienced stress in the last month, ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often).
The total score rangs from 0 to 16.
Higher scores indicate that the respondents suffer from greater stress.
|
3 months postpartum
|
|
Co-parenting relationship between couples
Time Frame: 6 weeks postpartum
|
The Chinese version of The brief Co-parenting Relationship Scale (Feinberg et al., 2012; Wu, Li & Zhao, 2017) will be used to assess the co-parenting relationship between couples.
The scale contains 14 items covering seven domains.
Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert Scale from 0 to 6, with total scores ranging from 0 to 84.
The Cronbach's alpha of Chinese version is 0.613, and the exploratory factor analysis showed Model fit was acceptable, with a reported KMO 0.748, Bartlett's χ2=686.086,
P<0.01.
|
6 weeks postpartum
|
|
Co-parenting relationship between couples
Time Frame: 3 months postpartum
|
The Chinese version of The brief Co-parenting Relationship Scale (Feinberg et al., 2012; Wu, Li & Zhao, 2017) will be used to assess the co-parenting relationship between couples.
The scale contains 14 items covering seven domains.
Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert Scale from 0 to 6, with total scores ranging from 0 to 84.
The Cronbach's alpha of Chinese version is 0.613, and the exploratory factor analysis showed Model fit was acceptable, with a reported KMO 0.748, Bartlett's χ2=686.086,
P<0.01.
|
3 months postpartum
|
|
Parenting stress of parents
Time Frame: 6 weeks postpartum
|
The parenting stress of parents will be measured using the Short Version of the Parenting Stress Index (Abidin & Abidin, 1990).
The subscale of parental distress (PD) (12 items) and parent-child dysfunctional interaction (PCDI) (12 items) will be used in this study (Leung et al., 2005; Liu, Chen, Yeh, & Hsieh, 2012).
The content validity of the Chinese version was 0.86 and the reliability was 0.91 after the removal of the DC subscale (Liu et al., 2012).
Respondents are asked to rate the items using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Total scores of these two subscales range from 24 to 120, with scores ranging from 12 to 60 for each subscale (Liu et al., 2012).
A higher score predicts higher parenting stress.
|
6 weeks postpartum
|
|
Parenting stress of parents
Time Frame: 3 months postpartum
|
The parenting stress of parents will be measured using the Short Version of the Parenting Stress Index (Abidin & Abidin, 1990).
The subscale of parental distress (PD) (12 items) and parent-child dysfunctional interaction (PCDI) (12 items) will be used in this study (Chan et al., 2005; Liu, Chen, Yeh, & Hsieh, 2012).
The content validity of the Chinese version was 0.86 and the reliability was 0.91 after the removal of the DC subscale (Liu et al., 2012).
Respondents are asked to rate the items using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Total scores of these two subscales range from 24 to 120, with scores ranging from 12 to 60 for each subscale (Liu et al., 2012).
A higher score predicts higher parenting stress.
|
3 months postpartum
|
|
Parenting self-efficacy of parents
Time Frame: 6 weeks postpartum
|
The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (Gibaud-Wallston & Wandersman, 2001) will be used to assess the parenting self-efficacy of parents.
This 17-item scale consists of two subscales, and has been widely used for assessments of parenting self-efficacy.
Each item is rated from 1 to 6, with a total socre ranging from 17 to 102.
A higher score indicates higher parenting self-efficacy.
The Cronbach's alpha was 0.85 for the total scale in the Chinese version, and 0.80 and 0.77 for the subscales of Efficacy and Satisfaction, respectively.
The test-retest reliability was 0.87.
Good construct validity was also confirmed in the Chinese version via factor analyses, where 82% of the factors were loaded (Ngai, Chan, & Holroyd, 2007).
|
6 weeks postpartum
|
|
Parenting self-efficacy of parents
Time Frame: 3 months postpartum
|
The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (Gibaud-Wallston & Wandersman, 2001) will be used to assess the parenting self-efficacy of parents.
This 17-item scale consists of two subscales, and has been widely used for assessments of parenting self-efficacy.
Each item is rated from 1 to 6, with a total socre ranging from 17 to 102.
A higher score indicates higher parenting self-efficacy.
The Cronbach's alpha was 0.85 for the total scale in the Chinese version, and 0.80 and 0.77 for the subscales of Efficacy and Satisfaction, respectively.
The test-retest reliability was 0.87.
Good construct validity was also confirmed in the Chinese version via factor analyses, where 82% of the factors were loaded (Ngai, Chan, & Holroyd, 2007).
|
3 months postpartum
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ngai Feiwan, PhD, School of Nursing
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Abidin, R. R., & Abidin, R. R. (1990). Parenting Stress Index (PSI)(p. 100).
- Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
- Feinberg ME, Brown LD, Kan ML. A Multi-Domain Self-Report Measure of Coparenting. Parent Sci Pract. 2012 Jan 1;12(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2012.638870. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
- Gibaud-Wallston, J., & Wandersman, L. (2001). Parenting sense of competence scale (PSOC).
- Li, X.W., & Wei, X.Y. (2018). Revision of the Grandparents-Parents Co-parenting Relationships Scale in Chinese Families. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(5):882-886. In Chinese.
- Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385-401.
- Wu, J.M., Li, G.J. & Zhao, H. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Brief co-parenting Relationship Scale. Research on Maternal and Child Health in China, 28 (4), 369-371. In Chinese
- Liu CC, Chen YC, Yeh YP, Hsieh YS. Effects of maternal confidence and competence on maternal parenting stress in newborn care. J Adv Nurs. 2012 Apr;68(4):908-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05796.x. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
- Ngai FW, Wai-Chi Chan S, Holroyd E. Translation and validation of a chinese version of the parenting sense of competence scale in chinese mothers. Nurs Res. 2007 Sep-Oct;56(5):348-54. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000289499.99542.94.
- Leung C, Leung S, Chan R, Tso K, Ip F. Child behaviour and parenting stress in Hong Kong families. Hong Kong Med J. 2005 Oct;11(5):373-80.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSEARS20210927005
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Parenting
-
NCT06197997RecruitingParenting | Parenting Intervention
-
NCT04296656CompletedParenting Satisfaction | Parenting Self-efficacy
-
NCT06145477RecruitingParenting | Parenting Intervention
-
NCT06179576Recruiting
-
NCT02973906Completed
-
NCT03097991Completed
-
NCT04378894Unknown
-
NCT02428465Completed
Clinical Trials on Usual care
-
NCT01864707CompletedMultiple Sclerosis | Fatigue
-
NCT01727362Completed
-
NCT01853189Unknown
-
NCT03200548TerminatedQuality of Life | Fatigue | Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic | Sleep | Pain, Chronic
-
NCT00558805CompletedSuicide, Attempted
-
NCT03644615CompletedOsteoarthritis | Mindfulness | MBSR
-
NCT03633097CompletedKnee Replacement | Acupuncture
-
NCT02865967Completed
-
NCT02473432Completed
-
NCT05575375Completed