PEG-rhG-CSF Compared With rhG-CSF in Lymphoma Patients After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

December 13, 2021 updated by: Huiqiang Huang, Sun Yat-sen University

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of PEG-rhG-CSF Compared With rhG-CSF After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma Patients

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEG-rhG-CSF compared with rhG-CSF on the recovery of hematopoietic function after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEG-rhG-CSF compared with rhG-CSF in lymphoma patients after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to PEG-rhG-CSF group or rhG-CSF group. Patients in PEG-rhG-CSF group received PEG-rhG-CSF day +1 after transplantation with a dose of 6 mg. Patients in rhG-CSF group received rhG-CSF day +1 after transplantation with a dose of 5μg/kg once per day until the count of neutrophil>0.5×10^9 /L.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Huiqiang Huang, professor
  • Phone Number: 0086-13808885154
  • Email: huang_sysu@163.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with age between 18 and 65 years;
  2. hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the first time;
  3. Lymphoma patients with the requirement for autologous;
  4. ECOG score ≤2;
  5. Estimated survival time > 3 months;
  6. All acute toxicity caused by previous chemotherapy or treatment has been restored; 7.1) The absolute value of neutrophils (>1.5×10^9/L); Hemoglobin (> 90 g/L); 2)Upper Limit Normal (ULN) or creatinine clearance rate (>40 mL/min) of serum creatinine (<1.5 times normal value upper limit) (estimated by Cockcroft-Gault formula); Serum total bilirubin < 1.5 times ULN; Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) = 2.5 times ULN; 7) Coagulation function: International Normalized Ratio (INR) = 1.5 times ULN; Prothrombin Time (PT), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) = 1.5 times ULN (unless the subject is receiving anticoagulant therapy and PT and APTT are using anticoagulant therapy at screening time). Within the expected range; Thyrotropin (TSH) or free thyroxine (FT4) or free triiodothyronine (FT3) were all within the normal range (+10%);

8.Not in pregnancy; 9.Written informed consent are acquired.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Had received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or allogeneic transplantation;
  2. bone marrow involvement;
  3. Patients with active autoimmune diseases requiring systematic treatment were excluded according to the clinical judgment of the investigators;
  4. Patients with active infections requiring systematic treatment were excluded according to the clinical judgment of the investigators;
  5. Serious complications, such as severe infection, heart, lung, liver and kidney dysfunction；
  6. patients in fever of unknown origin before medication（>38℃）；
  7. central nervous system involvement;
  8. Patients that received pelvic radiotherapy;
  9. patients will received Chemotherapy or radiotherapy under the diaphragm after transplantation ；
  10. Participation or consideration of participation in another biomedical study during the follow-up period of the present trial;
  11. Pregnant or lactating women;
  12. Serious heart, lung, hemorrhagic disease;
  13. Past psychiatric history; incapacitated or restricted;
  14. patient's condition increase the risk of receiving the drug treatment or confusion about the toxic reaction；
  15. Severe intolerance to the growth factor under study, or hypersensitivity to one of their components;
  16. the patients did not comply with the study;
  17. Other situation that investigators consider as contra-indication for this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: PEG-rhG-CSF
Patients in PEG-rhG-CSF group received PEG-rhG-CSF day+1 after transplantation.
Drug: PEG-rhG-CSF
PEG-rhG-CSF was given day +1 after autologous stem cell transplantation with a dose of 6mg.
Active Comparator: rhG-CSF
Patients in rhG-CSF group received rhG-CSF day+1 after transplantation.
Drug: rhG-CSF
rhG-CSF was given day +1 after autologous stem cell transplantation with a dose of 5μg/kg once per day until the count of neutrophil>0.5×10^9 /L.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to neutrophil engraftment
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The duration of neutrophilic granulocytopenia
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Incidence of febrile neutrophilic granulocytopenia
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Time to platelet engraftment and number of platelet transfused to the patient
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Adverse Event
Time Frame: 30 days
Safety
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sun Yat-sen University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Jiangsu HengRui Medicine Co., Ltd.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Huiqiang Huang, professor, Sun Yat-sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 13, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MA-ASCT-II-001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings