HPV-based Screening Among Women 23-29 Years of Age

March 18, 2025 updated by: Joakim Dillner, Karolinska Institutet

Evaluation of Organized Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Screening of 23-29-year-old Women

The aim of the trial is to determine whether organized screening with primary HPV analysis provide higher cancer protection in the age group 23-29 years compared to primary cytology.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The aim is to investigate whether primary HPV analysis in the organized cell sampling program for women in the age group 23-29 provides higher cancer protection compared to the current method where cell samples are primarily analyzed with cytology. In this study, all women in the age group 23-29 in the Stockholm and Skåne Region of Sweden will participate. Age is defined by year of birth. For 2020, women born 1991-1997 are included. Sampling and collection of samples is the same as for cytology.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
180000

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Sweden
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 102 39
        • Recruiting
        • Region Stockholm
        • Contact:
    • Skåne
      • Lund, Skåne, Sweden, 221 00
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Region of Skåne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

23 years to 29 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women ages 23-29 invited to screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who do not show up for screening or do not consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: HPV-based screening
Women 23-29 invited to cervical screening will have their samples analyzed for HPV.
Diagnostic test: HPV testing
All women age 23-29 resident in the pilot counties will be invited to HPV screening as of the study start date. The same invitation as currently used for women aged 30 and upwards will be used. This information clearly states that it is possible to opt out of the program and that data from the screening program will be collected to regional and national quality registers who will systematically evaluate the quality of the care. At the screening station, the samples are collected identically regardless of primary screening test used - there is no change in the procedures used neither for the woman or for the midwives taking the sample. HPV testing will be performed using the same purchased, CE-marked and accredited HPV screening platforms as currently used for women aged 30 and upwards. The cytology is according to the liquid-based cytology method.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 1.
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
Measured once during 1 year, year 1.
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 2.
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
Measured once during 1 year, year 2.
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 3.
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
Measured once during 1 year, year 3.
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 4.
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
Measured once during 1 year, year 4.
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 5.
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
Measured once during 1 year, year 5.
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 6.
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
Measured once during 1 year, year 6.
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 7.
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
Measured once during 1 year, year 7.
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 8.
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
Measured once during 1 year, year 8.
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 9.
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
Measured once during 1 year, year 9.
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 10.
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
Measured once during 1 year, year 10.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 1.
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group. Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
Measured once during 1 year, year 1.
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 2.
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group. Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
Measured once during 1 year, year 2.
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 3.
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group. Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
Measured once during 1 year, year 3.
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 4.
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group. Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
Measured once during 1 year, year 4.
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 5.
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group. Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
Measured once during 1 year, year 5.
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 6.
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group. Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
Measured once during 1 year, year 6.
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 7.
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group. Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
Measured once during 1 year, year 7.
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 8.
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group. Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
Measured once during 1 year, year 8.
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 9.
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group. Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
Measured once during 1 year, year 9.
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 10.
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group. Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
Measured once during 1 year, year 10.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Karolinska Institutet

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Joakim Dillner, MD, PhD, Karolinska University Hospital/Karolinska Institutet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 16, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2038

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2038

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 30, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 18, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020-00053

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

IPD has been discussed but a plan isn't finalized.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings