- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05229679
HPV-based Screening Among Women 23-29 Years of Age
March 18, 2025 updated by: Joakim Dillner, Karolinska Institutet
Evaluation of Organized Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Screening of 23-29-year-old Women
The aim of the trial is to determine whether organized screening with primary HPV analysis provide higher cancer protection in the age group 23-29 years compared to primary cytology.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aim is to investigate whether primary HPV analysis in the organized cell sampling program for women in the age group 23-29 provides higher cancer protection compared to the current method where cell samples are primarily analyzed with cytology.
In this study, all women in the age group 23-29 in the Stockholm and Skåne Region of Sweden will participate.
Age is defined by year of birth.
For 2020, women born 1991-1997 are included.
Sampling and collection of samples is the same as for cytology.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
180000
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Joakim Dillner, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +46 (0) 72-468 24 60
- Email: joakim.dillner@ki.se
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Miriam Elfström, PhD
- Phone Number: +46 (0) 70-381 62 77
- Email: miriam.elfstrom@ki.se
Study Locations
-
-
-
Stockholm, Sweden, 102 39
- Recruiting
- Region Stockholm
-
Contact:
- Joakim Dillner, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +46 (0) 72-468 24 60
- Email: joakim.dillner@ki.se
-
-
Skåne
-
Lund, Skåne, Sweden, 221 00
- Active, not recruiting
- Region of Skåne
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
23 years to 29 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women ages 23-29 invited to screening.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women who do not show up for screening or do not consent.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: HPV-based screening
Women 23-29 invited to cervical screening will have their samples analyzed for HPV.
|
All women age 23-29 resident in the pilot counties will be invited to HPV screening as of the study start date.
The same invitation as currently used for women aged 30 and upwards will be used.
This information clearly states that it is possible to opt out of the program and that data from the screening program will be collected to regional and national quality registers who will systematically evaluate the quality of the care.
At the screening station, the samples are collected identically regardless of primary screening test used - there is no change in the procedures used neither for the woman or for the midwives taking the sample.
HPV testing will be performed using the same purchased, CE-marked and accredited HPV screening platforms as currently used for women aged 30 and upwards.
The cytology is according to the liquid-based cytology method.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 1.
|
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 1.
|
|
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 2.
|
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 2.
|
|
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 3.
|
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 3.
|
|
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 4.
|
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 4.
|
|
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 5.
|
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 5.
|
|
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 6.
|
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 6.
|
|
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 7.
|
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 7.
|
|
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 8.
|
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 8.
|
|
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 9.
|
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 9.
|
|
Incidence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 10.
|
Cervical cancer incidence in the intervention group compared to a historical control group.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 10.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 1.
|
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group.
Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 1.
|
|
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 2.
|
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group.
Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 2.
|
|
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 3.
|
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group.
Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 3.
|
|
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 4.
|
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group.
Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 4.
|
|
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 5.
|
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group.
Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 5.
|
|
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 6.
|
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group.
Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 6.
|
|
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 7.
|
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group.
Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 7.
|
|
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 8.
|
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group.
Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 8.
|
|
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 9.
|
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group.
Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 9.
|
|
Cost-effectiveness of the new screening method
Time Frame: Measured once during 1 year, year 10.
|
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based screening among women 23-29 as compared to cytology-based screening in the same age group.
Cost data will be collected from the economy system used for the administration of the study, and compared to previous cost data.
|
Measured once during 1 year, year 10.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Joakim Dillner, MD, PhD, Karolinska University Hospital/Karolinska Institutet
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 16, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2038
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2038
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 27, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
February 8, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 18, 2025
Last Verified
March 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Uterine Diseases
- Genital Diseases, Female
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Neoplasms, Squamous Cell
- Precancerous Conditions
- Uterine Cervical Diseases
- Papilloma
- Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020-00053
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
IPD Plan Description
IPD has been discussed but a plan isn't finalized.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer
-
University of California, San DiegoWithdrawnCervical Cancer | Cervical Cancer Stage | Cervical Cancer Stage IB2 | Cervical Cancer Stage IB1 | Cervical Cancer Stage I | Cervical Cancer Stage IB | Cervical Cancer Stage II | Cervical Cancer Stage IIa | Cervical Cancer, Stage IIB | Cervical Cancer, Stage III | Cervical Cancer Stage IIIB | Cervical Cancer... and other conditionsUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterWithdrawnStage IB3 Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage II Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIA Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIA1 Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIA2 Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIB Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage III Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIIA Cervical Cancer FIGO... and other conditions
-
Tata Memorial HospitalMahidol University; Juntendo University; Gunma University; Chiang Mai University...RecruitingStage IIA Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIB Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIIA Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIIB Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IVA Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IB Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018India, Japan, Thailand
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingCervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma | Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Not Otherwise Specified | Recurrent Cervical Carcinoma | Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage II Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIA Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIA1 Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIA2 Cervical... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of PennsylvaniaWithdrawnCervical Cancer | Stage IB Cervical Cancer | Stage IIA Cervical Cancer | Stage IIB Cervical Cancer | Stage III Cervical Cancer | Stage IVA Cervical Cancer
-
Qi ZhouNot yet recruitingCervical Cancer Recurrent | Cervical Cancer Metastatic
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityNot yet recruitingCervical Cancer Recurrent | Cervical Cancer Metastatic
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedCervical Adenocarcinoma | Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Stage IB Cervical Cancer | Stage IIA Cervical Cancer | Stage IIB Cervical Cancer | Stage III Cervical Cancer | Stage IVA Cervical Cancer | Stage IVB Cervical CancerUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecruitingCervical Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma | Cervical Neuroendocrine Carcinoma | Cervical Small Cell Carcinoma | Cervical Undifferentiated Carcinoma | Stage I Cervical Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IA Cervical Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IA1 Cervical Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IA2 Cervical Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingStage IA Cervical Cancer | Stage IB Cervical Cancer | Stage IA1 Cervical Cancer | Stage IA2 Cervical Cancer | Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer | Stage IB2 Cervical Cancer | Stage IB3 Cervical CancerUnited States
Clinical Trials on HPV testing
-
Medipol Universitygaziantep university medicine facultyCompleted
-
Augusta UniversityThe Equality Clinic of AugustaUnknownCervical Cancer | Human Papilloma Virus | Transgenderism
-
University of RochesterActive, not recruitingHPV | Cervical CancersUnited States
-
Karolinska InstitutetRegion StockholmActive, not recruitingHigh-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia | Invasive Cervical CancerSweden
-
Addis Ababa UniversityCharite University, Berlin, Germany; Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-WittenbergUnknownCervical Cancer
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecruiting
-
University Hospital, GenevaCompletedCervical Intra-epithelial Neoplasia Grade 1 or WorseSwitzerland
-
Instituto Nacional del Cáncer, ArgentinaInternational Agency for Research on Cancer; National Council of Scientific... and other collaboratorsCompletedCervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaArgentina
-
The University of Hong KongThe Family Planning Association of Hong KongUnknownCervical Cancer | Cervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaChina
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingCervical Carcinoma | Human Papillomavirus-Related CarcinomaUganda