Pronase Granules in Gastric Cleaning
The Efficiency of Pronase Granules in Gastric Cleaning of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Zhuan Liao
- Phone Number: 81 021-31161024
- Email: zhuanleo@126.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jiahui Zhu
- Phone Number: 18301952685
- Email: jiahuizhu2685@126.com
Study Locations
-
-
Shanghai
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Recruiting
- Changhai Hospital
-
Contact:
- Zhuan Liao, professor
- Phone Number: 86 021-31161004
- Email: zhuanleo@126.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years old.
- Those who underwent upper gastrointestinal and small intestinal mucosal examination under magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy at Shanghai Changhai Hospital and Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital after January 2020.
- Able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- dysphagia or symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction, suspected or known intestinal stenosis, overt gastrointestinal bleeding, history of upper gastrointestinal surgery or abdominal surgery altering gastrointestinal anatomy, or post-abdominal radiation;
- congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, use of anticoagulant medication,
- implanted metallic devices such as pacemakers, defibrillators, artificial heart valves or joint prostheses (although the low magnetic field used technically should not interfere with such devices);
- pregnancy;
- currently participating in another clinical study.
- Patients who fail to follow the prescribed procedures for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy;
- Patients who only undergo gastric examination under magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy;
- Patients who only undergo small bowel examination under magnetic control capsule endoscopy;
- The patient's basic information in the database is incomplete#
- Patient fail to be followed up.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control group
All patients underwent a bowel preparation that consisted of a low-residue diet for 24 hours, fluid intake, and ingestion of two liters of polyethylene glycol-based electrolyte solution 12 hours before the examination.
On the examination day, patients arrived at the hospital in the morning after an overnight fast (>8hours).
Then they would be randomly assigned to the control group or pronase group randomly.
40 minutes before capsule ingestion, all patients swallowed 100ml clear water containing 50mg dimethicone.
And 25 minutes before swallowing the capsule, the patient was asked to take 200ml warm water.
There is still have 800-1000ml water for gastric filling 10 minutes before swallowing the capsule.
|
Drink Deyo with 200ml warm water 25 minutes before swallowing the capsule to remove mucus in the stomach.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Pronase group
All patients underwent a bowel preparation that consisted of a low-residue diet for 24 hours, fluid intake, and ingestion of two liters of polyethylene glycol-based electrolyte solution 12 hours before the examination.
On the examination day, patients arrived at the hospital in the morning after an overnight fast (>8hours).
Then they would be randomly assigned to the control group or pronase group randomly.
40 minutes before capsule ingestion, all patients swallowed 100ml clear water containing 50mg dimethicone.
And 25 minutes before swallowing the capsule, the patient was asked to take 20000 IU pronase Granules Combined with 1 g NaHCO3 dissolved in 200ml warm water to maintain the intragastric pH at 6 - 8.
There is still have 800-1000ml water for gastric filling 10 minutes before swallowing the capsule.
|
Drink Deyo with 200ml warm water 25 minutes before swallowing the capsule to remove mucus in the stomach.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gastric Cleanliness Score (GCS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Six primary anatomical landmarks of the stomach (cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum, and pylorus) were recorded for evaluation.
A 4-point grading scale was introduced to define the cleanliness as excellent (no adherent mucus and foam: score 4), good (mild mucus and foam but do not obscure vision: score 3), fair (considerable amount of mucus or foam present precluding a completely reliable examination: score 2) and poor (large amount of mucus or foam residue needing water to clear it: score 1).
GCS was the total scores of all six landmarks, ranging from 6 (completely unprepared) to 24 (perfect).
GCS of≥18 was regarded as acceptable.
|
2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visualization of the small bowel Visualization of the small bowel Visualization of the small bowel Visualization of the small bowel Visualization of the small bowel
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Visualization of the small bowel was determined by the percentage of time during which the small-bowel view was clear, defined as not obscured more than 50% of the screen view.
The clear-viewing percentage of the total small bowel transit time assessed by a 4-point scale :0, less than 25%; 1, 25% to 49%; 2, 50% to 75%; and 3, greater than 75%.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Fullness score
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Fullness is the subjective feeling of patients assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS).
VAS typically take the form of a straight line with two extreme states anchored at either end.
In this study, it is a 100mm VAS with a question"How full do you feel?"anchored with "not at all full"at the left side and "as full as I have ever felt" at the right side.
Patients will be asked to mark their feelings on the line.
The distance (mm) between the far left and the marked point is the score of fullness.
0 represents no perception at all, 10 indicates pain and needs to be stopped immediately.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Gastric Examination Time (GET)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The time taken for the gastric examination to the endoscopist's satisfaction.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Esophageal transit time (ETT)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The time between the first image of esophagus and the first image of stomach.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Gastric transit time (GTT)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The time between the first image of stomach and the last image of stomach.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Small bowel transit time (SBTT)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The time between the last image of stomach and the image of ileocecal valve.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Completion Rate (CR)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The completion of stomach was defined as the observation of cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum and pylorus and the completion of small bowel examination was defined as the ileocecal valve was photographed.The completion rate in each group was defined as the percentage of patients with a complete examination out of the total number of patients examined.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Adverse events occurence rate
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The safety were evaluated at two week after procedure for any adverse events such as infection, pain, nausea, vomiting and capsule impaction or retention.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Detection rate of lesions
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The detection rate of lesions in different digestive part (esophagus, stomach, duodenum, small intestine) found by MCE.
|
2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Zhu SG, Qian YY, Tang XY, Zhu QQ, Zhou W, Du H, An W, Su XJ, Zhao AJ, Ching HL, McAlindon ME, Li ZS, Liao Z. Gastric preparation for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy: A prospective, randomized single-blinded controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Jan;50(1):42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.09.129. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
- Liao Z, Hou X, Lin-Hu EQ, Sheng JQ, Ge ZZ, Jiang B, Hou XH, Liu JY, Li Z, Huang QY, Zhao XJ, Li N, Gao YJ, Zhang Y, Zhou JQ, Wang XY, Liu J, Xie XP, Yang CM, Liu HL, Sun XT, Zou WB, Li ZS. Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;14(9):1266-1273.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 May 20.
- Krijbolder MS, Grooteman KV, Bogers SK, de Jong DJ. Addition of simethicone improves small bowel capsule endoscopy visualisation quality. Neth J Med. 2018 Jan;76(1):27-31.
- Cave DR, Hakimian S, Patel K. Current Controversies Concerning Capsule Endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Nov;64(11):3040-3047. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05791-4.
- Shamsudhin N, Zverev VI, Keller H, Pane S, Egolf PW, Nelson BJ, Tishin AM. Magnetically guided capsule endoscopy. Med Phys. 2017 Aug;44(8):e91-e111. doi: 10.1002/mp.12299. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
- Jiang X, Pan J, Li ZS, Liao Z. Standardized examination procedure of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy. VideoGIE. 2019 May 30;4(6):239-243. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2019.03.003. eCollection 2019 Jun. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Gastric preparation of MCE
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.