- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05249933
Pronase Granules in Gastric Cleaning
February 21, 2022 updated by: Zhuan Liao, Changhai Hospital
The Efficiency of Pronase Granules in Gastric Cleaning of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) is now widely used all over the world.
However, the standard gastric preparation method by dimethicone we used clinically still has mucus at the bottom of the stomach.
In this study, we aimed to determine whether pronase granules is helpful to improve the cleanliness of gastric mucosa in MCE.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Detailed Description
As a non-invasive and well-tolerated gastrointestinal examination method, magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) is being increasingly used in different populations in recent years.
Gastric preparation is extremely important for the completion rate (CR), image quality, and diagnostic efficiency because of the plica of gastric mucosa and the autonomous movement of the capsule in the gastrointestinal tract.
After a series of explorations including air-producing powder, defoamer, protease preparation, patients are asked to drink about 800 ml-1000 ml water in a short time for standard gastric filling.
However, the existing problems of gastric preparation such as abdominal distension, insufficient gastric filling, and long gastric retention time deserve attention.
Different from the results of Zhu et al. (DLD, 2017), the current clinical experience shows that the addition of pronase granules in gastric preparation can often reduce the mucus in the stomach.
But the standardized use of pronase granules remains to be further explored.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
290
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Zhuan Liao
- Phone Number: 81 021-31161024
- Email: zhuanleo@126.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jiahui Zhu
- Phone Number: 18301952685
- Email: jiahuizhu2685@126.com
Study Locations
-
-
Shanghai
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Recruiting
- Changhai Hospital
-
Contact:
- Zhuan Liao, professor
- Phone Number: 86 021-31161004
- Email: zhuanleo@126.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years old.
- Those who underwent upper gastrointestinal and small intestinal mucosal examination under magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy at Shanghai Changhai Hospital and Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital after January 2020.
- Able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- dysphagia or symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction, suspected or known intestinal stenosis, overt gastrointestinal bleeding, history of upper gastrointestinal surgery or abdominal surgery altering gastrointestinal anatomy, or post-abdominal radiation;
- congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, use of anticoagulant medication,
- implanted metallic devices such as pacemakers, defibrillators, artificial heart valves or joint prostheses (although the low magnetic field used technically should not interfere with such devices);
- pregnancy;
- currently participating in another clinical study.
- Patients who fail to follow the prescribed procedures for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy;
- Patients who only undergo gastric examination under magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy;
- Patients who only undergo small bowel examination under magnetic control capsule endoscopy;
- The patient's basic information in the database is incomplete#
- Patient fail to be followed up.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control group
All patients underwent a bowel preparation that consisted of a low-residue diet for 24 hours, fluid intake, and ingestion of two liters of polyethylene glycol-based electrolyte solution 12 hours before the examination.
On the examination day, patients arrived at the hospital in the morning after an overnight fast (>8hours).
Then they would be randomly assigned to the control group or pronase group randomly.
40 minutes before capsule ingestion, all patients swallowed 100ml clear water containing 50mg dimethicone.
And 25 minutes before swallowing the capsule, the patient was asked to take 200ml warm water.
There is still have 800-1000ml water for gastric filling 10 minutes before swallowing the capsule.
|
Drink Deyo with 200ml warm water 25 minutes before swallowing the capsule to remove mucus in the stomach.
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Pronase group
All patients underwent a bowel preparation that consisted of a low-residue diet for 24 hours, fluid intake, and ingestion of two liters of polyethylene glycol-based electrolyte solution 12 hours before the examination.
On the examination day, patients arrived at the hospital in the morning after an overnight fast (>8hours).
Then they would be randomly assigned to the control group or pronase group randomly.
40 minutes before capsule ingestion, all patients swallowed 100ml clear water containing 50mg dimethicone.
And 25 minutes before swallowing the capsule, the patient was asked to take 20000 IU pronase Granules Combined with 1 g NaHCO3 dissolved in 200ml warm water to maintain the intragastric pH at 6 - 8.
There is still have 800-1000ml water for gastric filling 10 minutes before swallowing the capsule.
|
Drink Deyo with 200ml warm water 25 minutes before swallowing the capsule to remove mucus in the stomach.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Gastric Cleanliness Score (GCS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Six primary anatomical landmarks of the stomach (cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum, and pylorus) were recorded for evaluation.
A 4-point grading scale was introduced to define the cleanliness as excellent (no adherent mucus and foam: score 4), good (mild mucus and foam but do not obscure vision: score 3), fair (considerable amount of mucus or foam present precluding a completely reliable examination: score 2) and poor (large amount of mucus or foam residue needing water to clear it: score 1).
GCS was the total scores of all six landmarks, ranging from 6 (completely unprepared) to 24 (perfect).
GCS of≥18 was regarded as acceptable.
|
2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Visualization of the small bowel Visualization of the small bowel Visualization of the small bowel Visualization of the small bowel Visualization of the small bowel
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Visualization of the small bowel was determined by the percentage of time during which the small-bowel view was clear, defined as not obscured more than 50% of the screen view.
The clear-viewing percentage of the total small bowel transit time assessed by a 4-point scale :0, less than 25%; 1, 25% to 49%; 2, 50% to 75%; and 3, greater than 75%.
|
2 weeks
|
Fullness score
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Fullness is the subjective feeling of patients assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS).
VAS typically take the form of a straight line with two extreme states anchored at either end.
In this study, it is a 100mm VAS with a question"How full do you feel?"anchored with "not at all full"at the left side and "as full as I have ever felt" at the right side.
Patients will be asked to mark their feelings on the line.
The distance (mm) between the far left and the marked point is the score of fullness.
0 represents no perception at all, 10 indicates pain and needs to be stopped immediately.
|
2 weeks
|
Gastric Examination Time (GET)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The time taken for the gastric examination to the endoscopist's satisfaction.
|
2 weeks
|
Esophageal transit time (ETT)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The time between the first image of esophagus and the first image of stomach.
|
2 weeks
|
Gastric transit time (GTT)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The time between the first image of stomach and the last image of stomach.
|
2 weeks
|
Small bowel transit time (SBTT)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The time between the last image of stomach and the image of ileocecal valve.
|
2 weeks
|
Completion Rate (CR)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The completion of stomach was defined as the observation of cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum and pylorus and the completion of small bowel examination was defined as the ileocecal valve was photographed.The completion rate in each group was defined as the percentage of patients with a complete examination out of the total number of patients examined.
|
2 weeks
|
Adverse events occurence rate
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The safety were evaluated at two week after procedure for any adverse events such as infection, pain, nausea, vomiting and capsule impaction or retention.
|
2 weeks
|
Detection rate of lesions
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The detection rate of lesions in different digestive part (esophagus, stomach, duodenum, small intestine) found by MCE.
|
2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Zhu SG, Qian YY, Tang XY, Zhu QQ, Zhou W, Du H, An W, Su XJ, Zhao AJ, Ching HL, McAlindon ME, Li ZS, Liao Z. Gastric preparation for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy: A prospective, randomized single-blinded controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Jan;50(1):42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.09.129. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
- Liao Z, Hou X, Lin-Hu EQ, Sheng JQ, Ge ZZ, Jiang B, Hou XH, Liu JY, Li Z, Huang QY, Zhao XJ, Li N, Gao YJ, Zhang Y, Zhou JQ, Wang XY, Liu J, Xie XP, Yang CM, Liu HL, Sun XT, Zou WB, Li ZS. Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;14(9):1266-1273.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 May 20.
- Krijbolder MS, Grooteman KV, Bogers SK, de Jong DJ. Addition of simethicone improves small bowel capsule endoscopy visualisation quality. Neth J Med. 2018 Jan;76(1):27-31.
- Cave DR, Hakimian S, Patel K. Current Controversies Concerning Capsule Endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Nov;64(11):3040-3047. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05791-4.
- Shamsudhin N, Zverev VI, Keller H, Pane S, Egolf PW, Nelson BJ, Tishin AM. Magnetically guided capsule endoscopy. Med Phys. 2017 Aug;44(8):e91-e111. doi: 10.1002/mp.12299. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
- Jiang X, Pan J, Li ZS, Liao Z. Standardized examination procedure of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy. VideoGIE. 2019 May 30;4(6):239-243. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2019.03.003. eCollection 2019 Jun. No abstract available.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
February 24, 2021
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
February 20, 2022
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
March 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 21, 2022
First Posted (ACTUAL)
February 22, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
February 22, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 21, 2022
Last Verified
February 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Gastric preparation of MCE
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gastric Disease
-
Inonu UniversityNot yet recruitingGastric Disease | Gastric DistressTurkey
-
University of FloridaCompletedPancreatobiliary Disease | Altered Gastric AnatomyUnited States
-
Changhai HospitalPeking Union Medical College Hospital; Chinese PLA General Hospital; RenJi Hospital and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Gastritis | Gastric Diseases, | Gastric Ulcer, | Gastric Polyps, | Early Gastric Cancer,China
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityCompletedLiver Diseases | Small Bowel Disease | Colorectal Disease | Gastric Diseases | Digestive Tract DiseasesChina
-
Shandong UniversityCompletedArtificial Intelligence | Gastric Diseases | Confocal Laser EndomicroscopyChina
-
Duke UniversityCompletedLocally Advanced Esophageal and Gastric Cancers (EGC)United States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingStomach Neoplasms | Stomach Cancer | Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Proximal Polyposis of the Stomach (GAPPS) | Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC) | Familial Diffuse Gastric CancerUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterRecruitingGastric Cancer | Gastric Adenocarcinoma | Gastric Cancer Stage IV | Gastric Neoplasm | Gastric Cancer Metastatic to Lung | Gastric Cancer Stage | Gastric Cancer Metastatic to Liver | Gastric Cancer Stage III | Gastric Cancer Stage II | Gastric Lesion | Gastric Cancer in Situ | Gastric Cancer Stage IIIB | Gastric... and other conditionsUnited States, Japan
-
Hvidovre University HospitalUnknownGastric Bypass | Gastric BandingDenmark