The Effects of Chiropractic in Adults With Colon Cancer (CCX)
The Effects of Chiropractic Care on the Quality of Life and Autonomic Nervous System in Adults With Colon Cancer: a Single-arm Pilot Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
After providing informed consent, individuals will undergo 6 weeks of chiropractic care. Throughout these 6 weeks there will be three assessments (Day 1, Week 2, and Week 6) that each include the following:
- Isometric hand grip
- Postural challenge
- Patient-reported outcome surveys
- Off-site blood draw for CEA level testing (only Day 0 and Week 6)
Each assessment will consist of the following recordings:
- Electrodermal activity [EDA]
- Impedance cardiography [ICG]
- Electrocardiogram [ECG]
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Austin Garlinghouse
- Phone Number: 770-426-2639
- Email: research.studies@life.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
- Dr. Sid E. Williams Center for Chiropractic Research
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males & females 18 years of age or older
- Able to provide informed consent
- Diagnosed with stage 3 or stage 4 colon cancer and currently receiving standard of care with a medical doctor.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals with a known disorder resulting in syncope/fainting during postural changes (e.g., POTS, orthostatic hypotension)
- Cancer has metastasized to the cervical spine
- Individuals who have had a serious injury or surgery to the head, torso, lower body within the past 6 months.
- Individuals with evidence or medical history of clinically significant psychiatric disorder like anti-social disorder, schizophrenia, or borderline personality disorder that is uncontrolled or untreated.
- Individuals who currently have pending health related legal litigation.
- Individuals with a known heart condition (e.g., arrhythmia) that could result in an aberrant electrocardiogram.
- Individuals with a pacemaker
- Individuals who are on short benzodiazepines which include midazolam & triazolam
- Individuals with conditions that could result in neck instability such as rheumatoid arthritis.
- Individuals who do not present with a subluxation in the upper cervical region (C1/C2) at any point during the 6 weeks of chiropractic care.
- Individuals with a condition that may cause weak or brittle bones such as osteoporosis
- Since x-rays may be requested for care, participants who are pregnant will be excluded from the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Chiropractic
Cervical chiropractic care
|
Chiropractic high velocity low amplitude adjustment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: Upon reaching target number of completed participant trials
|
Length of time needed to recruit target number of participants
|
Upon reaching target number of completed participant trials
|
|
Patient adherence rate
Time Frame: Upon reaching target number of completed participant trials
|
Proportion of participants able to adhere to the testing & treatment protocol/schedule
|
Upon reaching target number of completed participant trials
|
|
Patient tolerability rate
Time Frame: Upon reaching target number of completed participant trials
|
Proportion of participants able to perform all aspects of the testing regimen
|
Upon reaching target number of completed participant trials
|
|
Acceptability of treatment regimen to participants
Time Frame: Week 6
|
8-item Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire
|
Week 6
|
|
Patient Retention
Time Frame: Upon reaching target number of completed participant trials
|
Proportion of enrolled participants who complete the full trial
|
Upon reaching target number of completed participant trials
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Electrodermal activity (EDA) skin conductance level (SCL)
Time Frame: Day 1
|
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
|
Day 1
|
|
Electrodermal activity (EDA) skin conductance level (SCL)
Time Frame: Week 2
|
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
|
Week 2
|
|
Electrodermal activity (EDA) skin conductance level (SCL)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
|
Week 6
|
|
Electrodermal activity (EDA) power spectral density (PSD)
Time Frame: Day 1
|
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
|
Day 1
|
|
Electrodermal activity (EDA) power spectral density (PSD)
Time Frame: Week 2
|
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
|
Week 2
|
|
Electrodermal activity (EDA) power spectral density (PSD)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
|
Week 6
|
|
Electrodermal activity (EDA) non-specific skin conductance responses (SCR)
Time Frame: Day 1
|
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
|
Day 1
|
|
Electrodermal activity (EDA) non-specific skin conductance responses (SCR)
Time Frame: Week 2
|
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
|
Week 2
|
|
Electrodermal activity (EDA) non-specific skin conductance responses (SCR)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
|
Week 6
|
|
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) pre-ejection period (PEP)
Time Frame: Day 1
|
2 sensors on chest and 2 sensors on back
|
Day 1
|
|
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) pre-ejection period (PEP)
Time Frame: Week 2
|
2 sensors on chest and 2 sensors on back
|
Week 2
|
|
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) pre-ejection period (PEP)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
2 sensors on chest and 2 sensors on back
|
Week 6
|
|
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) initial systolic time interval (ISTI)
Time Frame: Day 1
|
2 sensors on chest and 2 sensors on back
|
Day 1
|
|
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) initial systolic time interval (ISTI)
Time Frame: Week 2
|
2 sensors on chest and 2 sensors on back
|
Week 2
|
|
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) initial systolic time interval (ISTI)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
2 sensors on chest and 2 sensors on back
|
Week 6
|
|
ECG interbeat interval
Time Frame: Day 1
|
3 sensors on torso
|
Day 1
|
|
ECG interbeat interval
Time Frame: Week 2
|
3 sensors on torso
|
Week 2
|
|
ECG interbeat interval
Time Frame: Week 6
|
3 sensors on torso
|
Week 6
|
|
ECG respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
Time Frame: Day 1
|
3 sensors on torso
|
Day 1
|
|
ECG respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
Time Frame: Week 2
|
3 sensors on torso
|
Week 2
|
|
ECG respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
3 sensors on torso
|
Week 6
|
|
ECG de-trended fluctuation analysis
Time Frame: Day 1
|
3 sensors on torso
|
Day 1
|
|
ECG de-trended fluctuation analysis
Time Frame: Week 2
|
3 sensors on torso
|
Week 2
|
|
ECG de-trended fluctuation analysis
Time Frame: Week 6
|
3 sensors on torso
|
Week 6
|
|
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Off-site blood draw and lab testing
|
Day 1
|
|
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels
Time Frame: Week 6
|
Off-site blood draw and lab testing
|
Week 6
|
|
Patient-reported outcomes
Time Frame: Day 0
|
5 questionnaires: EORTC QLQ-C30, COMPASS-31, PROMIS-29, PROMIS-Cog, Perceived Stress Scale
|
Day 0
|
|
Patient-reported outcomes
Time Frame: Day 1
|
5 questionnaires: EORTC QLQ-C30, COMPASS-31, PROMIS-29, PROMIS-Cog, Perceived Stress Scale
|
Day 1
|
|
Patient-reported outcomes
Time Frame: Week 2
|
5 questionnaires: EORTC QLQ-C30, COMPASS-31, PROMIS-29, PROMIS-Cog, Perceived Stress Scale
|
Week 2
|
|
Patient-reported outcomes
Time Frame: Week 6
|
5 questionnaires: EORTC QLQ-C30, COMPASS-31, PROMIS-29, PROMIS-Cog, Perceived Stress Scale
|
Week 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Stephanie Sullivan, DC, PhD, Life University
- Principal Investigator: Yoram Gidron, PhD, University of Haifa
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- I-0019
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.